Skip to main content
Social Sci LibreTexts

1.9: References

  • Page ID
    34153
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    Andrén, A. 1998. Between Artefacts and Texts: Historical archaeology in global perspective. New York: Plenum Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9409-0

    Barrett, J. C. 2001. Agency, the Duality of Structure, and the Problem of the Archaeological Record. In Hodder, I. (ed.), Archaeological Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press, 141–164.

    Beard, M., Bowman, A. K., Corbier, M., Cornell, T., Franklin Jr., J. L., Hanson, A., Hopkins, K. and Horsfall, N. (eds) 1991. Literacy in the Roman World (Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplementary Series 3). Ann Arbor, MI: Department of Classical Studies, University of Michigan.

    Bottéro, J. 1992. Mesopotamia: Writing, reasoning and the gods. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Bottéro, J. 2000. Religion and Reasoning in Mesopotamia. In Bottéro, J., Herrenschmidt, C. and Vernant J. P. (eds), Ancestor of the West: Writing, reasoning and religion in Mesopotamia, Elam and Greece. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 3–66.

    Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice (translated by Richard Nice) (Cambridge Studies in Social and Cultural Anthropology 16). Cambridge University Press. DOI: dx.doi. org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507

    Carroll, M. 2009. ‘Vox tua nempe mea est’: Dialogues with the dead in Roman funerary commemoration. Accordia Research Papers 11(2007–2008): 37–76.

    Collins, J. and Blot, R. K. 2003. Literacy and Literacies: Texts, power, and identity (Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language 22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486661

    David, N. and Kramer, C. 2001. Ethnoarchaeology in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Dobres, M. A. 2000. Technology and Social Agency: Outlining a practice theory for archaeology. Maiden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

    Fahlander, F. and Kjellström, A. (eds) 2010. Making Sense of Things: Archaeologies of sensory perception (Stockholm Studies in Archaeology 53). Stockholm: Postdoctoral Archaeological Group Publications.

    Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The birth of the prison. Harmondsworth: Peregrine Books. Frantz, N. P. 1998. Material Culture, Understanding, and Meaning: Writing and picturing. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 66(4): 791–816. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1093/ jaarel/66.4.791

    Gardner, A. 2003. Seeking a Material Turn: The artefactuality of the Roman empire. In Carr, G., Swift, E. and Weekes, J. (eds), TRAC 2002: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, Canterbury 2002, 1–13. Oxford: Oxbow.

    Gardner, A. 2004. Introduction: Social agency, power, and being human. In Gardner, A. (ed.), Agency Uncovered: Archaeological perspectives on social agency, power, and being human. London: UCL Press, 1–15. Gibson, J. J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Giddens, A. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory. London: Macmillan.

    Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Harris, W. V. 1989. Ancient Literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Hawkes, C. 1954. Archaeology Theory and Method: Some suggestions from the Old World. American Anthropologist 56(2): 155–168. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1954.56.2.02a00020

    Hodder, I. 2000. Agency and Individuals in Long-Term Processes. In Dobres, M.-A. and Robb, J. E. (eds), Agency in Archaeology. London: Routledge, 21–23.

    Ingold, T. 2007. Materials Against Materiality. Archaeological Dialogues 14(1): 1–16. DOI: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1380203807002127

    Janssen, J. J. 1987. On Style in Egyptian Handwriting. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 73: 161– 167. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.2307/3821527

    Jay, M. 2002. That Visual Turn: The advent of visual culture. Journal of Visual Culture 1(1): 87–92. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/147041290200100108

    Little, B. J. (ed.) 1992. Text-Aided Archaeology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Matthews, R. 2003. The Archaeology of Mesopotamia: Theories and approaches. London: Routledge.

    Mitchell, W. J. T. 2002. Showing Seeing: A critique of visual culture. Journal of Visual Culture 1(2): 165–181. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/147041290200100202

    Moreland, J. 2001. Archaeology and Text. London: Duckworth.

    Moreland, J. 2006. Archaeology and Texts: Subservience or enlightenment. Annual Review of Anthropology 35: 135–151. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an....081705.123132

    O’Hara, K. P., Taylor, A., Newman, W. and Sellen, A. J. 2002. Understanding the Materiality of Writing from Multiple Sources. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 56(3): 269– 305. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2001.0525

    Palaima, T. G. 1985. Appendix. In Åström, P. and Sjöquist, K.-E. (eds), Pylos: Palmprints and palmleaves (Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology, Pocket book no. 31). Göteburg: Paul Åströms Förlag, 99–107. Palaima, T. G. 1988. The Scribes of Pylos (Incunabula Graeca 87). Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.

    Piquette, K. E. 2007. Writing, ‘Art’ and Society: A contextual archaeology of the inscribed labels of Late Predynastic–Early Dynastic Egypt. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University College London.

    Piquette, K. E. 2008. Re-materialising Script and Image. In Gashe, V. and Finch, J. (eds), Current Research in Egyptology 2008: Proceedings of the ninth annual symposium, which took place at the KNH Centre for Biomedical Egyptology, University of Manchester, January 2008. Bolton: Rutherford Press Limited, 89–107.

    Piquette, K. E. forthcoming. Scribal Practice and an Early Dynastic Stone Vessel Inscriptions: Material and aesthetic implications. In Dodson, A., Johnston, J. J. and Monkhouse, W. (eds), A Good Scribe and an Exceedingly Wise Man: Studies in honour of W. J. Tait. London: Golden House.

    Piquette, K. E. 2013. Structuration and the Graphical in Early Dynastic Culture. In Dann, R. J. and Exell, K. (eds), Egypt: Ancient histories, modern archaeologies. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press, 51–99.

    Quirke, S. 2011. Agendas for Digital Palaeography in an Archaeological Context: Egypt 1800 bc. In Fischer, F. Fritze, C, and Vogeler, G. (eds), Kodikologie und Paläographie im digitalen Zeitalter 2 - Codicology and Palaeography in the Digital Age 2 (Schriften des Instituts für Dokumentologie und Editorik 3). Norderstedt: Books on Demand (BoD), 279–294. kups. ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/4354 [accessed 18 October 2013]

    Schiffer, M. B. and Skibo, J. M. 1987. Theory and Experiment in the Study of Technological Change. Current Anthropology 28(5): 595–622. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1086/203601

    Schlanger, N. 1996. Understanding Levallois: Lithic technology and cognitive archaeology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 6(2): 231–254. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1017/ S0959774300001724

    Sjöquist, K.-E. and Åström, P. 1991. Knossos: Keepers and kneaders (Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology, Pocket book no. 82). Gothenburg: Paul Åströms Förlag.

    Skeates, R. 2010. An Archaeology of the Senses: Prehistoric Malta. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Smith, M. 2008. Visual Culture Studies. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Tait, J. and Leach, B. 2000. Papyrus. In Shaw, I. and Nicholson, P. (eds), Ancient Egyptian Materials and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 227–253.

    Taylor, J. 2011. Tablets as Artefacts, Scribes as Artisans. In Radner, K. and Robson, E. (eds), Oxford Handbook of Cuneiform Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 5–31. DOI: dx.doi. org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199557301.013.0001

    Tite, M. S. 2008. Ceramic Production, Provenance and Use — A review. Archaeometry 50(2): 216–231. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.2008.00391.x

    Tufte, E. 1983 The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.

    Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932

    Whitehouse, R. D. 2008. The Materiality of Writing: Case studies from first millennium BC Italy. McDonald Lecture. 19 November 2008; unpublished.

    Whitehouse, R. D. 2012. Epilogue: Agency and writing. In Englehardt, J. (ed.), Agency in Ancient Writing. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.

    Woodward, A. and Leach, P. with contributions by Bayley, J. 1993. The Uley Shrines: Excavation of a ritual complex on West Hill, Uley, Gloucestershire, 1977–9 (Archaeological report [English Heritage] 17). London: English Heritage in association with British Museum Press.


    This page titled 1.9: References is shared under a not declared license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Kathryn Piquette (Ubiquity Press) via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the LibreTexts platform; a detailed edit history is available upon request.