4.1: Autonomy and Sense of Self in Infants and Toddlers
-
- Last updated
- Save as PDF
Learning Objectives
By the end of this section, you will be able to:
- Describe the concepts of autonomy and sense of self
- Identify the early milestones of self-awareness and development of self
- Describe the beginnings of gender identity and the role of gender socialization in development
Elyse is sixteen months old and starting to show a fair amount of independence. She toddles around the house with curiosity, exploring the objects, pets, and people around her. Her parents are thrilled to start engaging in play with her that shows her silly personality emerging. She likes to put a little toy car on her head and then let it roll off before giggling with delight at her own joke. Elyse looks at her parents and giggles even more when she sees their reaction.
Elyse recently learned the word “no” and loves to scrunch her face when she says it to turn down certain foods or clothes. Her mother Diana has heard other parents say, “Uh oh, that’s the first sign of the terrible twos !” but she cannot help but smile when Elyse says “no.” She feels proud of her daughter for learning to use a word to assert some independence, and she wonders how much her daughter understands about her individual self and the world around her.
Infants and toddlers begin to develop an awareness of their individuality, including their sense of self, independence, self-awareness, and the beginnings of gender identity. An early step in developing a sense of self is beginning to understand that we are different from others and learning how our body interacts in the world.
The Self and Others
When infants are born, they have no concept of self; they are unable to distinguish between who is “me” and who is not “me.” Their entire world is interconnected, and they are still discovering where they end and their caregiver or their surrounding environment begins (Fini et al., 2023).
One important step in discovering who they are is discovering what they have control over (Rosen, 2016). The sense of independence or freedom to control yourself and your actions is called autonomy . In the first few weeks of life, an infant may discover that they have complete autonomy over their ability to wiggle their arms and legs, but they don’t have control over whether their caregiver picks them up or feeds them. This awareness of the difference is the beginning of developing a sense of self (Guenther, 2022).
Infants also develop their awareness of the self versus others within their social experiences, beginning with interactions with their primary caregiver(s) (Erikson, 1968). Just as infants learn autonomy by discovering what they have control over, they are also discovering relatedness through their connections with others (Tamis-LeMonda et al., 2008). Caregiver interactions such as smiling, saying an infant’s name, and providing comfort and physical contact all help infants learn about their sense of self (Ross et al., 2017).
Cultural experiences with caregivers and others also play a role in shaping early autonomy and relatedness. For example, in many Western cultures, middle-class parents are more likely to encourage autonomy and a separate self, whereas non-Western middle-class parents are likely to focus more on social responsibility and the new family member’s role in the family (Keller, 2011, 2018). 1 One study showed that Japanese mothers temporarily living in the United States encouraged relatedness and shared experiences during play with their toddlers, while U.S. mothers emphasized autonomy (Dennis et al., 2002). Despite different styles of cultural and familial interactions, our sense of self and autonomy shows many similarities across cultures (Helwig, 2006).
As infants reach physical milestones such as being able to touch their feet, sit up, and crawl, they gain insight into themselves as someone distinct from others. As you learned in 3.4 Cognition and Memory in Infants and Toddlers, infants are also growing in their cognitive skills through circular reactions that allow them to better understand how they can influence their environment—from moving their body to manipulating objects (Piaget, 1954). These physical, social, and cognitive milestones all work collectively to give infants a sense of self, an awareness of self as different from others. Later in early childhood and beyond, this sense of self will grow into a self-concept as children’s cognitive development and self-awareness improve. At first, however, the self-concept is basic, containing very little information other than bodily control (Guenther, 2022).
Self-Recognition
Determining exactly when an infant has a sense of self, or self-awareness, is no easy task. After all, the sense of self is slowly developing alongside the infant’s cognitive and physical development and interactions with their caregivers. At the age of twelve months, the infant may know how to interact with a caregiver or manipulate a toy for entertainment, but the infant’s sense of self typically does not include their appearance. The reason is that infants lack self-recognition , the ability to recognize and be aware of themselves in reflective surfaces or photos (Figure 4.2) (Anderson, 1984). Researchers use a task involving a mirror to assess when infants acquire visual self-recognition, known as the mirror test (also, rouge test ) (Lewis & Brooks-Gunn, 1979). In this test, a red mark is made on the infants’ nose without their being aware, and then they are placed in front of a mirror. Researchers then simply observe how the infant reacts, or does not react, to the red mark.
Before the age of eighteen months, most infants regard their reflection with either wariness or openness; the face is perceived as that of a stranger or potential playmate. In other words, they do not seem to notice the red mark. This indicates to researchers that their self-recognition is incomplete; they do not recognize their face. After eighteen months, most touch their nose, indicating a sense of self-awareness and self-recognition. These infants are indicating that they know their face and recognize it, and that red mark is not part of their self-awareness . Infants may meet these milestones, like many others, at various ages based on their experiences including environmental and social influences. For example, some research indicates that when mothers scaffold learning (such as by asking who is in the mirror), infants learn to recognize themselves earlier (Bard et al., 2006). Other research indicates that when parents engage in imitation (such as a parent imitating their toddler’s play behavior), infants also may learn self-recognition earlier (Cebioğlu & Broesch, 2021).
The mirror self-recognition test is a useful indication of emerging self-awareness in toddlers and fairly easy to try at home to learn more about a toddler’s experience of the world (Brandl, 2018; Suddendorf & Butler, 2013). Table 4.1 provides a detailed breakdown of the age-related changes assessed in this test. Even after recognizing themselves in a mirror, infants may not pick themselves out in group photos until they are about twenty-four months of age, indicating that self-awareness is still developing (Courage et al., 2004).
| Age (Months) | Typical Reaction to the Mirror Test |
|---|---|
| 6–12 | Shows social interest in a potential playmate |
| 12–18 | Expresses wariness, avoidance, and confusion |
| 18–24 | Reveals self-recognition by touching their own nose |
Link to Learning
The mirror test is a simple test used to identify the beginnings of self-recognition in infants and toddlers. Watch this video demonstrating the mirror test to learn more.
How does self-awareness develop if there are no mirrors? Ross and colleagues (2017) examined a group of eighteen-month-old infants in Scotland and Zambia, of whom 90 percent of Scottish but only 15 percent of Zambian infants had regular access to mirrors. Although the Scottish infants performed better on the mirror test, the Zambian infants performed significantly better on a body-as-obstacle test . Body-as-obstacle is the situation that occurs when our body position or placement interferes with our goals. In this test of self-awareness, infants were placed on a mat that needed to be moved; they needed to recognize that they must step off the mat before attempting to pull it. Acquiring self-recognition and self-awareness allows infants to explore and interact in their world much more fully, including being able to engage in pretend play and better communicate with others about their experiences (Lewis & Ramsay, 2004). Children likely show differences in the aspects of self-recognition they demonstrate based on their cultural and familial experiences. For example, some may acquire body awareness first, whereas others may acquire visual awareness first. Infants and toddlers also show self-awareness in other ways, such as by using personal pronouns (Courage et al., 2004). Each of these aspects of self-awareness develops in the first few years of life.
Link to Learning
Like the mirror test, the body-as-obstacle test can teach us more about infants’ and toddlers’ self-awareness. Watch this video demonstrating the body-as-obstacle test to learn more.
Gender Identity and Socialization
Understanding who we are requires knowing many facets of ourselves, our culture, and our abilities. One area of identity that begins to develop especially early in life is our gender identity . People commonly ask whether a new baby is a boy or a girl. Sometimes parents-to-be even “reveal” this and other details about their infant before birth, at gender-reveal parties. Actually, “gender reveal” is a misnomer, because what is being revealed is the baby’s biological sex, not their psychological gender identity.
An individual’s sex is often assigned at birth (or before) based on the presence of external genitalia or genetic testing (assigned female at birth, or assigned male at birth, AFAB and AMAB, respectively). Infants are typically classified as either male or female, but some are identified as having differences of sex development (DSD), which indicates their physical or biological characteristics are neither exclusively female nor exclusively male (Media et al., 2022; Sax, 2002). Although most females have two X chromosomes (XX) and most males have one X and one Y chromosome (XY), DSD individuals may have many other genetic combinations, prenatal hormonal expressions, and/or physical characteristics. (Refer to 2.1 Genetics and Environment for more information.)
As discussed in 1.4 Contexts and Settings of Development, gender identity is an individual’s psychological sense of their gender. Often, our gender identity is associated with our biological sex; many males identify as boys and men, and many females identify as girls and women. But that is not always the case. Understanding, recognizing, and identifying our own gender is a complex process that takes years to accomplish and often begins with gender socialization.
The process by which we are exposed to and learn gender roles and expectations in our culture is gender socialization . As soon as families know an infant’s biological sex, they often start to enforce gender stereotypes —societal expectations and assumptions based on an individual’s sex or gender identity. For example, infants’ clothes, toys, and blankets may be selected so that they reinforce gender stereotypes: pink ballerinas for girls and blue trucks for boys. Infants quickly learn these stereotypes; at twelve, eighteen, and twenty-four months of age, girls tend to look longer at photos of dolls than boys do, and boys tend to look longer at photos of trucks than girls do (Jadva et al., 2010; Serbin et al., 2001). A recent meta-analysis showed that boys preferred certain toys and girls preferred others, suggesting that girls and boys show similar levels of gender-related differences in toy preference, both for broad groups of toys and for dolls and vehicles specifically (Davis & Hines, 2020). The tendency to prefer gender-stereotyped toys also increased with the child’s age, indicating that gender socialization may increase gender-stereotyped play over time. Gender socialization comes from caregivers, peers, and media and often begins before an infant is even born, sometimes without awareness or intent (Figure 4.3).
Link to Learning
Even people who believe they would treat boys and girls the same way can easily end up using gender stereotypes in interacting with babies. Check out this video that demonstrates how children’s clothing and surrounding toys can influence their interactions with adults to learn more.
But gender stereotypes go beyond toy selection. Parents of girls tend to perceive them as more delicate and handle them with a soft touch, whereas parents of boys tend to perceive them as strong and use a firmer and more energetic touch (Stepakoff & Beebe, 2023; Stern & Hildebrant-Karraker, 1989). Parents also differ in the types of vocalizations, conversation style, eye contact, and play behavior they initiate with infant girls and boys (Morawska, 2020). Finally, parents may enforce gender stereotypes by rewarding infants when they conform to gendered expectations (Caldera et al. 1989; Stacey, 2021). However, other studies have shown that these gender differences in toy preferences are not always present. In a study of six- to twenty-month-old infants in Australia, infant toy preferences were based on a range of factors beyond gender, including parental attitudes, past toy exposure, and whether the toy was moved or was stationary (Liu et al., 2020). Parents who show gendered preferences in the toys they expose children to likely increase gender-stereotyped play, whereas parents who encourage a wider range of toy types may have infants who do not show gender-stereotyped toy preferences.
Parents may also begin to encourage different learning skills, such as by engaging in more scientific conversations with boy children (Crowley et al., 2001). Strangers, teachers, and others also reinforce these stereotypes. Multiple studies have found that the simple act of changing infants’ gender-stereotyped clothing can alter the way adults play and talk with them (Frisch, 1977; Shakin et al., 1985). In conclusion, children learn gender roles and stereotypes in society through socialization (Leaper & Friedman, 2007). However, parents show great variability in their own gendered expectations. For example, a study of expectant parents in Germany found that fathers were more likely than mothers to have gendered beliefs about their future baby, such as believing their female baby would be soft spoken, whereas a male baby would be assertive (Imhoff & Hoffman, 2023).
Intersections and Contexts: Gender, Culture, and Media
Gender socialization and stereotypes vary around the world. Although boys and masculinity have classically been associated with power and dominance and girls and femininity with cooperation and submissiveness, the extent to which people believe in these stereotypes varies by culture (Foels & Pappas, 2004). For instance, preschoolers in France and Lebanon are more likely to believe there is a gendered difference in capacity for leadership and power than are preschoolers in Norway (Charafeddine et al., 2020). One reason might be Norway’s strong policies to promote gender equality across a range of occupations and in educational programs in classrooms.
How do we transmit these beliefs about gender in our culture? Often, we do it through the behaviors and expectations of family members. But a second powerful source is the media and literature. For instance, toy commercials directed at young children differed in their endorsement of gender stereotypes, with Australian commercials showing more similarity between boys and girls and commercials in the United States showing more exaggerated differences (Browne, 1998). In the latter commercials, boys were more likely to display aggression, dominance, and leadership than girls were. Girls were more likely to be portrayed as cooperative and submissive. More recently, research has shown that picture books in early childhood education centers in both the United States and Australia tended to depict stereotyped and binary gender roles (Adam & Harper, 2021). Children’s books also show these gender stereotypes in the words chosen for describing characters (Lewis et al., 2022). This indicates that these gendered trends are pervasive across many cultures and children’s early experiences.
Infants and toddlers learn about their world by watching others and through exposure to the media. The way boys and girls are depicted in children’s media may inform toddlers about the gender expectations in their culture (Figure 4.4). Encouraging children from infancy onward to play with a wide range of toys and be more aware of the gender roles portrayed in their media and literature can be highly beneficial to their growing sense of identity and gender. It can also offer them a wider variety of choices for discovering themselves and the world around them.
Gender stereotypes and socialization provide infants with feedback and insight into their own gender identity (Fausto-Sterling, 2021). On average, by age two years, toddlers can identify the gender of their family members, and by age three years, they can label their own gender (Poulin-Dubois et al., 1998). Signs that a child may be gender diverse or gender nonconforming can appear in these early years if their biological sex and gender identity don’t match society’s expectations. One sign is infants responding negatively to their assigned gender’s toys, terms, and clothes and preferring to respond and conform to another gender (deMayo et al., 2022). However, some gender role experimentation is typical in young children whether they are gender conforming or gender diverse. Finally, because gender behaviors exist on a spectrum and genders have far more commonalities than differences, it’s generally recommended that adults let infants and toddlers explore a range of behaviors and toys (Halpern & Perry-Jenkins, 2016).
References
Adam, H., & Harper, L. J. (2021). Gender equity in early childhood picture books: A cross-cultural study of frequently read picture books in early childhood classrooms in Australia and the United States. Australian Education Research, 50, 453–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-021-00494-0
Anderson, J. R. (1984). The development of self-recognition: A review. Developmental Psychobiology, 17 (1), 35–49. doi.org/10.1002/dev.420170104
Bard, K. A., Todd, B. K., Bernier, C., Love, J., & Leavens, D. A. (2006). Self-awareness in human and chimpanzee infants: What is measured and what is meant by the mark and mirror test? Infancy, 9 (2), 191–219. doi.org/10.1207/s15327078in0902_6
Brandl, J. L. (2018). The puzzle of mirror self-recognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 17 , 279–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-016-9486-7
Browne, B. A. (1998). Gender stereotypes in advertising on children’s television in the 1990s: A cross-national analysis. Journal of Advertising, 27 (1), 83–96. www.jstor.org/stable/4189061
Caldera, Y. M., Huston, A. C., & O’Brien, M. (1989). Social interactions and play patterns of parents and toddlers with feminine, masculine, and neutral toys. Child development , 60 (1), 7076. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1989.tb02696.x
Cebioğlu, S., & Broesch, T. (2021). Explaining cross-cultural variation in mirror self-recognition: New insights into the ontogeny of objective self-awareness. Developmental Psychology , 57 (5), 625–638. psycnet.apa.org/record/2021-58449-002
Charafeddine, R., Zambrana, I. M., Triniol, B., Mercier, H., Clement, F., Kaufmann, L., Reboul, A., Pons, F., & van der Henst, J.-B. (2020). How preschoolers associate power with gender in male-female interactions: A cross-cultural investigation. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 83 (7–8), 453–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01116-x
Courage, M. L., Edison, S. C., & Howe, M. L. (2004). Variability in the early development of visual self-recognition. Infant Behavior & Development, 27 (4), 509–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2004.06.001
Crowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Tenenbaum, H. R., & Allen, E. (2001). Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Association for Psychological Science , 12 (3), 258–261. doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00347
Davis, J. T. M., & Hines, M. (2020). How large are gender differences in toy preferences? A systematic review and meta-analysis of toy preference research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49 (2), 373–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01624-7
deMayo, B. E., Jordan, A. E., & Olson, K. R. (2022). Gender development in gender diverse children. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 4, 207–229. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devp...-121020-034014
Dennis, T. A., Cole, P. M., Zahn-Waxler, C., & Mizuta, I. (2002). Self in context: Autonomy and relatedness in Japanese and U.S. mother-preschooler dyads. Child Development, 73 (6), 1803–1817. doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00507
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. Norton & Co. psycnet.apa.org/record/1968-35041-000
Fausto-Sterling, A. (2021). A dynamic systems framework for gender/sex development: From sensory input in infancy to subjective certainty in toddlerhood. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, 613789. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.613789
Fini, C., Bardi, L., Bolis, D., Fusaro, M., Lisi, M. P., Michalland, A. H., & Era, V. (2023). The social roots of self development: From a bodily to an intellectual interpersonal dialogue. Psychological Research , 87 (6), 1683–1695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01785-6
Foels, R., Pappas, C. J. (2004). Learning and unlearning the myths we are taught: Gender and Social Dominance Orientation. Sex Roles , 50, 743–757. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000029094.25107.d6
Frisch, H. L. (1977). Sex stereotypes in adult-infant play. Child Development , 48 (4), 1671–1675. www.jstor.org/stable/1128533
Guenther, K., (2022). The Mirror and The Mind: A History of Self-Recognition in Human Sciences. Princeton University Press. www.jstor.org/stable/j.cdbmfhq1h
Halpern, H. P., & Perry-Jenkins, M. (2016). Parents’ gender ideology and gendered behavior as predictors of children’s gender-role attitudes: A longitudinal exploration. Sex Roles, 74 , 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0539-0
Helwig, C. C. (2006). The development of personal autonomy throughout cultures. Cognitive Development, 21 (4), 458–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.06.009
Imhoff, R., & Hoffmann, L. (2023). Prenatal sex role stereotypes: Gendered expectations and perceptions of (expectant) parents. Archives of Sexual Behavior , 52 (3), 1095–1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02584-9
Jadva, V., Hines, M., & Golombok, S. (2010). Infants’ preferences for toys, colors, and shapes: Sex differences and similarities. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39 (6), 1261–1273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9618-z
Keller, H. (2011). Autonomy and relatedness revisited: Cultural manifestations of universal human needs. Child Developmental Perspectives, 6 (1), 12–18. doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00208.x
Keller, H. (2018). Parenting and socioemotional development in infancy and early childhood. Developmental Review, 50 (Part A), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2018.03.001
Leaper, C., & Friedman, C. K. (2007). The socialization of gender. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 561–587). The Guilford Press. psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-23344-022
Lewis, M., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1979). Social Cognition and the Acquisition of Self. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.10...-1-4684-3566-5
Lewis, M., Borkenhagen, M. C., Converse, E., Lupyan, G., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2022). What might books be teaching young children about gender? Psychological Science , 33 (1), 33–47. doi.org/10.1177/09567976211024643
Lewis, M., & Ramsay, D. (2004). Development of self-recognition, personal pronoun use, and pretend play during the 2 nd year. Child Development, 75 (6), 1821–1831. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00819.x
Liu, L., Escudero, P., Quattropani, C., & Robbins, R. A. (2020). Factors affecting infant toy preferences: Age, gender, experience, motor development, and parental attitude. Infancy : The Official Journal of the International Society on Infant Studies , 25 (5), 593–617. doi.org/10.1111/infa.12352
Media, L. M., Fauske, L., Sigurdardottir, S., Feragen, K. J. B., Heggeli, C., & Waehre, A. (2022). ‘It was supposed to be a secret’: A study of disclosure and stigma as experienced by adults with differences of sex development. Health Psychology & Behavioral Medicine, 10 (1), 579–595. doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2022.2102018
Morawska, A. (2020). The effects of gendered parenting on child development outcomes: A systematic review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 23 (4), 553–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-020-00321-5
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. Basic Books. psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-09595-000
Poulin-Dubois, D., Serbin, L. A., & Derbyshire, A. (1998). Toddlers’ intermodal and verbal knowledge about gender. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 44 (3), 338–354. psycnet.apa.org/record/1998-10856-004
Rosen, K. S. (2016). Social and Emotional Development: Attachment Relationships and the Emerging Self. Bloomsbury Academic.
Ross, J., Yilmaz, M., Dale, R., Cassidy, R., Yildirim, I., & Zeedyk, M. S. (2017). Cultural differences in self-recognition: The early development of autonomous and related selves? Developmental Science, 20 (3), e12387. doi.org/10.1111/desc.12387
Sax, L. (2002). How common is intersex? A response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. The Journal of Sex Research, 39 (3), 174–178. doi.org/10.1080/00224490209552139
Serbin, L. A., Poulin-Dubois, D., Colburne, K. A., Sen, M. G., & Eichstedt, J. A. (2001). Gender stereotyping in infancy: Visual preferences for and knowledge of gender-stereotyped toys in the second year. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25 (1), 7–15. doi.org/10.1080/01650250042000078
Shakin, M., Shakin, D. & Sternglanz, S. H. (1985). Infant clothing: Sex labeling for strangers. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research , 12 (9–10), 955–964. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288097
Stacey, L. (2021). The family as gender and sexuality factor: A review of the literature and future directions. Sociology Compass, 15 (4), Article e12864. doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12864
Stepakoff, S., & Beebe, B. (2023). Maternal Touch as a Channel of Communication at Age Four Months: Variations by Infant Gender and Maternal Depression. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior , 48 (2), 213–234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10919-023-00442-9
Stern, M., & Hildebrandt-Karraker, K. (1989). Sex stereotyping of infants: A review of gender labeling studies. Sex Roles, 20 (9), 501–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288198
Suddendorf, T., & Butler, D. L. (2013). The nature of visual self-recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17 (3), 121–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.01.004
Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Way, N., Hughes, D., Yoshikawa, H., Kalman, R. K., & Niwa, E. Y. (2008). Parents’ goals for children: The dynamic coexistence of individualism and collectivism in cultures and individuals. Social development , 17 (1), 183–209. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00419.x