16.4: Living Environments and Aging in Late Adulthood
-
- Last updated
- Save as PDF
Learning Objectives
By the end of this section, you will be able to:
- Describe various housing environments for older adults
- Identify the benefits and concerns associated with each type of environment
Davine is eighty-three years old and lives alone. She hopes to stay in her home and live independently for the rest of her life. However, a few weeks ago she nearly fell getting out of the shower, and since then she’s been thinking about how she would care for herself if she had a serious injury or health problem. She decided to investigate installing support rails in the bathroom and making a few other easy changes that could prevent a fall, such as getting rid of slippery floor rugs. She also identified two home health organizations in case she might need more help in the future.
Older age can pose challenges related to living environments. Some older adults may need to scale down as home maintenance becomes more demanding. Others may need to move due to declines in health or functional ability. High-functioning older adults with financial resources may seek out facilities with amenities and opportunities for socialization. In this section, you'll learn about these varying needs and the housing situations individuals may consider in striving to meet them.
Aging in Place and Caregiver Support
When you think of living environments in older age, you might imagine institutional settings such as assisted living or nursing home facilities. Currently, however, fewer than 5 percent of U.S. adults aged sixty-five years and older live in an institutional setting (Hallstrom, 2023). Most older adults live at home.
The effort to live safely and comfortably at home while maintaining as much independence as possible is known as aging in place , and older adults generally prefer it; around eight in ten say they prefer to grow old in their home and community (AARP, 2021).
The primary motivations for wanting to age in place are maintaining daily independence and control of personal space (Ahn et al., 2017). There may also be measurable benefits. For example, aging in place is associated with better cognitive ability, less depression, and greater independence and functional ability than is found among nursing home residents (Marek et al., 2005). Older adults rate living at home as the optimal environment for very old adults (ages eighty years and older), including those with health problems, difficulty dressing, and mobility limitations (Kasper et al., 2018).
Research has typically considered two types of functional ability in older age: activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living. An activity of daily living (ADL) is an everyday self-care task, such as feeding yourself, bathing, and moving around your environment (Katz, 1983; Zawaly et al., 2022). People having difficulty performing ADLs require assistance from someone in their environment on a regular and consistent basis, typically several times a day (Figure 16.15).
There are some tasks that are considered more complex than ADLs, such as using the phone, shopping, preparing meals, doing laundry, managing medications, and dealing with finances (Lawton & Brody, 1969; Pashmdarfard & Azad, 2020). A task like this is referred to as an instrumental activity of daily living (IADL) . Someone who’s struggling with one or two IADL tasks may need help occasionally but not every day.
Is aging in place an option for individuals with ADL and IADL limitations? Possibly, because there are many resources to make this possible. One of the most common is the help of a caregiver. A caregiver is an individual who looks after and helps someone with health problems and difficulty performing ADLs and IADLs. Some are paid and trained, but many are just relatives or friends of the person in need.
Caregivers play a highly valuable role, but the work can be stressful, especially when informal caregiver s undertake the task (Figure 16.16). Informal caregivers, such as spouses and adult children, are the most common unpaid caregivers to older adults (Avent, 2019). It’s difficult to accept the reality of a loved one experiencing declining health and loss of independence, especially when that also means assuming the responsibility for that individual’s well-being, daily needs, and health care. Undertaking the caregiving role has thus been associated with poorer health and more anxiety and depression (del-Pino-Casado et al., 2021; Haley et al., 2020; Ho et al., 2009; Schulz et al., 2020).
Some health consequences may be directly related to caregiving responsibilities, such as back pain caused by lifting or moving the care recipient. Other research suggests that the chronic stress associated with caregiving is a source of health problems like high blood pressure and decreased immune system functioning (Haley et al., 2020; Schulz et al., 2020; Vitaliano et al., 2004). These risks are serious; individuals reporting demanding caregiving responsibilities had higher mortality rates than noncaregivers and caregivers with less demanding roles (Perkins et al., 2012; Schulz et al., 2020). These health problems can cause caregivers to end up needing care themselves, complicating the situation for everyone.
Caregiving situations can differ, often in complex ways, based on gender and cultural factors like race, ethnicity, and country of origin. Women are more likely to assume the role of primary caregiver and engage in more intense caregiving activities than men (Haley et al., 2020; Kim & Woo, 2022; Schulz et al., 2020). Women also devote more hours to caregiving and have greater mental and physical health declines associated with the role than men (Haley et al., 2020; Pinquart & Sörensen, 2006; Schulz et al., 2020). Within the United States, cross-cultural research has often, but not universally, demonstrated that Black caregivers report less burden and depression than White caregivers, potentially due to more positive appraisals of the caregiving relationship and an emphasis on religion as a source of comfort. Hispanic caregivers, on the other hand, tend to report high levels of caregiving-related distress as well as difficulty accessing services due to language barriers (Haley et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2021). Cultural factors may intersect with SES to influence the accessibility of services, especially for families with low incomes who disproportionately tend to be people of color.
The care recipient’s specific medical condition is another potential factor in caregiving. Caring for a family member with dementia can be especially difficult, for example, because of the progressive nature of the decline and the need for caregivers to manage ADLs, IADLs, and possibly behavior problems as well. Only one in ten older adults receiving caregiving at home has dementia, yet 41 percent of unpaid caregiving hours are devoted to dementia caregiving because it’s such an intense and demanding task (Haley et al., 2020; Kasper et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2021; Schulz et al., 2020). The negative consequences associated with dementia caregiving may again vary by culture. For example, because East Asian culture regards dementia as a form of mental illness and also regards mental illnesses as shameful, dementia caregivers of East Asian and East Asian American descent often report high levels of distress, specifically due to the stigma associated with the care recipient’s condition (Lim et al., 2020).
Another common resource for aging in place is home health aides. A home health aide is a professional who travels to clients’ homes and assists with health care, ADLs, and IADLs. Home health aides can help older adults continue to live at home instead of relocating to long-term care. While most home health aides report a high level of fulfillment and job satisfaction, they’re also financially vulnerable due to the low pay of the position (Bercovitz et al., 2011). Also, in the United States, naturalized citizens and legal noncitizen immigrants make up 26 percent of the nation’s home health aides, despite representing only 12 percent of the general workforce population. Thus, changes in their ability to work in the United States may negatively impact care resources for older adults and those who have disabilities (Zallman et al., 2019).
Some resources promoting aging in place are located outside the home. At adult daycare centers, older adults participate in supervised activities that provide physical and cognitive stimulation as well as opportunities for social interaction. This also gives informal caregivers a break and enables them to run errands, go to work, or just relax. This resource is most frequently used for older adults who have dementia, which can limit their ability to be at home alone (Cohen-Mansfield et al., 2001; Tuohy et al., 2023).
Perhaps the most rapidly growing resource to support aging in place is technology. Social media, cell phones, and software such as guided mindfulness training apps can contribute to mental well-being by providing opportunities for social engagement, staying in touch with loved ones, and managing anxiety. Physical well-being can be enhanced through technologies such as fitness trackers, medication reminders, and online exercise options such as YouTube videos, and alarms and notification devices can call for assistance if there’s a medical emergency or injury (Fang et al., 2016; Ollevier et al., 2020). More recently, technology applications and personal assistants have been found to help older adults access information, emergency contacts, and entertainment (O'Brien et al., 2019). Technologies have also expanded that support people with hearing or vision loss such as AI or personal assistants for visual support or applications that transcribe conversations for those who need auditory support. Apps that connect people to services such as food delivery and transportation can also be beneficial to older adults with IADL difficulties.
Independent Living Communities
While many people choose to age in place, some relocate to independent living communities designed for older adults. These are not considered institutional settings. Residents are completely independent, can come and go as they please, and enjoy the same freedom as all other adults. The only distinction is that the community is specifically intended for older adults (Figure 16.17). Typically, the living spaces have been customized with such aids as handrails for support and wheelchair accessibility ramps. Many age-restricted communities take care of all outside maintenance such as lawn work and snow removal, making the residence easier to maintain. They also tend to be located near transportation, health care, shopping, and other services (Chen et al., 2020). Older adults often report that they enjoy the amenities and the increased opportunities for socialization in these living situations (Bekhet et al., 2009).
Some older adults with IADL limitations may require additional assistance. Living in congregate housing can offer more access to assistance than typical independent living communities while also maintaining residents’ independence. Congregate housing arrangements are often similar to college dormitories in that there are private living areas and common spaces, such as dining areas or lounges. These facilities often have services such as a shuttle to help older adults with transportation, but they typically do not provide any medical services (Chum et al., 2022).
Using an intergenerational model, some European countries have developed innovative living options for older adults. In the Netherlands and France, there’s a significant shortage of affordable housing for young adults, so young adults are matched with older adults and then move into their home, either a private dwelling or an older adult community. There are ground rules for the young adult to follow, such as requirements for socializing with the older adults, in return for the housing (Arentshorst et al., 2019; Labit & Dubost, 2016).
Germany and Denmark have more single older adults and few all-day childcare resources so in these countries intergenerational living often pairs older adults and families with children in designated buildings or complexes (not preexisting neighborhoods or buildings that just happen to have people of different generations as neighbors). The older adults often become surrogate grandparents. The communities may be managed by local governments, churches, nonprofit organizations, or even the residents themselves (Beck, 2019; Labit & Dubost, 2016). All these options have the potential to benefit their residents of all ages by enhancing social and emotional functioning as well as providing practical support (Beck, 2019).
Assisted Living and Nursing Homes
While many older adults prefer aging in place or independent living situations, in some cases these options may not be feasible or safe, and relocating to an institutional setting is necessary. Here “institutional setting” means a monitored facility in which residents typically lack the freedom to come and go as they please. Two types of institutional living environments primarily serve older adults, depending on the person’s care needs:
- An assisted living facility is for individuals with physical and/or cognitive limitations that prevent them from living at home. Here they have access to many services such as meals and housekeeping. They also get assistance with IADL and ADL, such as help using the restroom, bathing, and taking medications.
- A nursing home is like an assisted living facility but also addresses medical care needs. It provides twenty-four-hour supervision that includes skilled nursing care and services such as occupational therapy, speech therapy, and physical rehabilitation. Nursing homes are the most common institutionalized living environment for older adults.
Both assisted living and nursing home settings also generally have dedicated areas for residents with dementia . These are frequently referred to as memory care units and provide specific supervision and cognitive stimulation for residents who may be confused, disoriented, or unaware of their surroundings (National Institute on Aging, 2023).
Only 2.5 percent of U.S. adults sixty-five years of age and older reside in nursing homes, but the likelihood of needing this type of environment increases with age (Bom et al., 2023; Hallstrom, 2023). Data suggest that 16.9 percent of nursing home residents in the United States are under age sixty-five years, 19.5 percent are sixty-five to seventy years of age, 27.2 percent are seventy-five to eighty-four years of age, and 36.4 percent are age eighty-five years or older (Sengupta et al., 2022). Not all are there for the long term, however. Some people need short stays for rehabilitation after a serious health event such as surgery or a stroke. Others might remain for a short period while their homes are modified to accommodate physical limitations, such as adding wheelchair accessibility. The percentage of older adults residing in nursing homes varies from country to country (Figure 16.18) (Bom et al., 2023; Dyer et al., 2020).
Figure 16.18 represents only affluent nations, largely in Europe and North America. Many lower-income nations, including in Africa and Central and South America, are experiencing aging societies as well and are seeing even larger increases in their older adult populations (Committee on Population, & National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2015; Velkoff & Kowal, 2007). Data about long-term care use and other health-care needs of older adults in these countries are less available, but most research suggests that the level of relliance on informal care provided at home by family members will not sustain the health needs of rapidly growing older populations (Kalideen et al., 2022; Robledo et al., 2022).
In some countries, a typical path for individuals unable to live independently would transition first to an assisted living facility, and then to a nursing home facility if their health worsens. Making several moves into different communities may be less than ideal, however, and a rapidly growing trend is to move to older adult housing compatible with a variety of needs. This type of facility is known as a continuing care community . Continuing care communities typically have a section dedicated to independent living, consisting of freestanding homes or apartments. If residents’ needs increase, some services such as transportation or meal preparation may be available, as in congregate housing environments. If more assistance is required, residents can move into assisted living or nursing home environments located on the same campus (National Institute on Aging, 2023). This allows older adults to maintain their independence as long as possible and have access to increasing levels of assistance without needing to relocate to different communities.
Financial and Safety Considerations of Different Settings
Care of older adults can be a large expense that requires planning and access to resources. Even when someone is aging at home, hiring home health aide s and making home modifications like installing wheelchair ramps costs money. Although Medicare may pay for some types of at-home services such as physical therapy and other skilled care (Medicare.gov, n.d.), homemaker and home health services cost an average of about $5,000 per month (Kaldy et al., 2024).
Informal caregiving isn’t without cost either because informal caregiver s are likely to quit their jobs or reduce their work hours to accommodate their caregiving, reducing income. Women are particularly likely to encounter this situation because they typically take on more caregiving responsibilities than men (Lee & Tang, 2015; Schulz et al., 2020). A recent study found that loss of income was one of the most consistent challenges expressed by caregivers (Nadash et al., 2023). Programs operated by Medicaid and other agencies aim to reduce the financial burden for individuals who leave the workforce to care for a loved one. Many of these programs have been criticized, however, for having rigid requirements, limits on enrollment, and long waitlists.
Congregate housing and independent living communities, while a potential alternative to both home and institutional care, have their own obstacles to financial access. In the United States, congregate housing programs are typically available only for residents of federally subsidized housing (United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, n.d.), meaning that some people may have income too high to qualify for this option but too low to make other options feasible. Independent living communities tend to be expensive—the median cost in the United States is about $3,000 per month (Shuman, 2024)—and these aren’t typically covered by insurance because they don’t provide medical services.
In the United States, the cost of living in long-term care facilities can be extremely high. The average cost of staying in a private room at a nursing home is $9,000 per month, and assisted living costs about half that. Medicare doesn’t typically cover nursing home living, though it may cover up to 100 days of rehabilitation services or skilled nursing care. Some options such as long-term care insurance can help cover these expenses, but these policies are expensive, must be purchased while you’re still independent and in good health, and aren’t available for people with certain health conditions, such as muscular dystrophy (Kaldy et al., 2023).
Most individuals don’t or can’t adequately prepare for long-term care in later life, and 80 percent of U.S. adults cannot afford it, making Medicaid the primary option. To qualify, however, typically an individual must first demonstrate they have no assets. If a person doesn’t have enough assets to pay for care themselves but has too much to qualify for Medicaid, they must spend all their assets, including selling their house and depleting all savings and retirement funds until they are considered impoverished. This “spending down” must occur at least five years before attempting to qualify for Medicaid (National Council on Aging, 2023; Ng et al., 2010; Potter & Bowblis, 2021).
Apart from the low level of income needed to qualify for support, there are other centers with Medicaid. For example, not all long-term care facilities accept it. Also, facilities that do accept Medicaid generally operate on a much smaller per-person budget than more expensive options, meaning they have fewer amenities. Research suggests that nursing homes with a high percentage of Medicaid-qualifying residents also score lower on overall quality than those serving primarily residents with private insurance. Medicaid-accepting facilities are much more likely to serve a higher percentage of people of color and to be located in low-income neighborhoods. Research identifying differences in quality of care based on SES, race, and ethnicity suggests that these discrepancies have been increasing over time (Konetzka et al., 2021).
Link to Learning
This care provider comparison tool from Medicare allows you to search different types of care providers to see how they compare against each other. After choosing a service type and entering a location, use the “compare” feature to see how providers rate on factors such as health inspections and number of beds, and whether they take Medicaid.
The financial aspects of nursing home care can vary considerably among countries along dimensions such as how the care is financed, how much of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) is spent on long-term care costs, whether people must meet a certain income threshold to qualify for government assistance, and what percentage of total costs is paid for out of pocket by the resident or their family. The Netherlands, where eligibility for support is not based on income, spends four times as much of its GDP on health care as the United States does, and its residents pay less than half as much out of pocket. In Japan, all adults over age forty years are required to purchase long-term care insurance. While the United Kingdom and the United States both have income requirements to qualify for government assistance with health-care costs, the level to qualify is fifteen times higher in the United States as compared with the United Kingdom (Gruber & McCarry, 2023; Lee et al., 2023; Rau, 2023). Overall, these data suggest that nursing homes and other long-term care are often paid for with a complicated combination of government assistance, private and public insurance, and out-of-pocket costs.
While aging in place is desirable for many reasons, safety is an important consideration with this option. Many houses don’t include accessibility features, and a person who starts needing help transferring on and off the toilet and can’t afford to install grab bars risks falling. This also produces safety concerns for informal caregivers, who may not have been trained in safe lifting procedures and could injure themselves while helping the care recipient.
An important concern in these types of living environments is elder abuse , which is the mistreatment or neglect of an older adult. It is not an uncommon problem; one in ten older adults in the United States is believed to be a victim of elder abuse at some point in their lives (National Council on Aging, 2024). Global data across twenty-eight countries indicate that one in six older adults worldwide experienced some form of abuse within the past year (World Health Organization, 2024).
Elder abuse can take many forms, including the physical, sexual, and emotional abuse and neglect seen in other populations. Other forms are more common among this older age group. For example, financial abuse occurs when people take money from an older adult without their knowledge. This can happen when family members exploit their relatives’ financial resources or if professionals overcharge for services. Financial abuse is thought to be the most common form of elder abuse (Figure 16.19) (Weissberger et al., 2019).
Elder abuse in institutional settings such as nursing homes tends to get a lot of attention, but a recent study examining nearly 2,000 reported cases revealed that family members and friends/acquaintances were the most common perpetrators, accounting for 47 and 25 percent of cases, respectively (Figure 16.20) (Weissberger et al., 2019). Informal caregivers often have no training in managing the emotional or physical aspects of caregiving and have an increased risk of social isolation and distress caused by caregiving, meaning they may perform their caregiving duties with little supervision or support and thus be at greater risk for engaging in abusive behavior. Generally, vulnerable older adults, such as those with poor health and those dependent on the perpetrator for care and assistance, are more likely to experience abuse. Caregivers who are financially dependent on the older adult or report psychological problems such as depression and burnout are more likely to perpetrate abuse (Storey, 2020).
The CDC and other resources indicate elder abuse can be prevented through improving our understanding of the challenges of aging, being aware of signs of abuse and how to report it, and checking in on older loved ones through regular visits (CDC, 2024). Additionally, if you are helping a loved one choose a caregiving facility, look for facilities that have educated staff, low turnover, opportunities for continued independence of residents, and clear care and kindness for residents (Maryville, 2024). If caregiving is provided at home, ensure that those providing care are provided with the social and emotional support they need to reduce caregiver stress and provide them with financial and tangible resources to provided adequate care such as education and training on the needs of the person under their care (APA, 2024).
Link to Learning
If you or someone you know is experiencing elder abuse, you can find reporting resources through the National Center on Elder Abuse website or reach out to Eldercare Locator for help. Call 1-800-677-1116 to be referred to your local agency. You can also find resources in your community for older adults and their families through Eldercare Locator.
References
AARP. (2021, November 18). AARP survey shows 8 in 10 older adults want to age in their homes, while the number and needs of households headed by older adults grow dramatically. AARP Press Room. https://press.aarp.org/2021-11-18-AA...0independently
Ahn, M., Kwon, H. J., & Kang, J. (2017). Supporting aging-in-place well: Findings from a cluster analysis of the reasons for aging-in-place and perceptions of well-being. Journal of Applied Gerontology , 39 (1), 3–15. doi.org/10.1177/0733464817748779
American Psychological Association. (2024, July 8). Elder abuse: How to spot warning signs, get help, and report mistreatment . https://www.apa.org/topics/aging-old...ts/elder-abuse
Arentshorst, M. E., Kloet, R. R., & Peine, A. (2019). Intergenerational housing: The case of Humanitas Netherlands. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 33 (3), 244–256. doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2018.1561592
Avent, E. S., Rath, L., Meyer, K., Benton, D., & Nash, P. (2019). Supporting family caregivers: How does relationship strain occur in caregiving dyads? A qualitative study. Innovation in Aging, 3 (Issue Supplement 1), 289. doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.1066
Beck, A. F. (2019). What is co-housing? Developing a conceptual framework from the studies of Danish intergenerational co-housing. Housing, Theory and Society, 37 (1), 40–64. doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2019.1633398
Bekhet, A. K., Zauszniewski, J. A., & Nakhla, W. E. (2009). Reasons for relocation to retirement communities. Western Journal of Nursing Research , 31 (4), 462–479. doi.org/10.1177/0193945909332009
Bercovitz, A., Moss, A. J., Sengupta, M., Park-Lee, E., Jones, A. L., & Harris-Kojetin, L. (2011). An overview of home health aides: United States, 2007. National Health Statistics Report , 34 , 1–31. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21688727
Bom, J., Bakx, P., van Doorslaer, E., Gørtz, M., & Skinner, J. (2023). What explains different rates of nursing home admissions? Comparing the United States to Denmark and the Netherlands. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing , 25 , 100456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeoa.2023.100456
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024, May 16). About abuse of older persons . U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/elder-abuse/abou...ion-prevention
Chen, Y., Bouferguene, A., Shirgaokar, M., & Al-Hussein, M. (2020). Spatial analysis framework for age-restricted communities integrating spatial distribution and accessibility evaluation. Journal of Urban Planning and Development , 146 (1). doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000537
Chum, K., Fitzhenry, G., Robinson, K., Murphy, M. B., Phan, D., Alvarez, J., Hand, C., Rudman, D. L., & McGrath, C. (2022). Examining community-based housing models to support aging in place: A scoping review. Gerontologist , 62 (3), e178–e192. doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa142
Cohen-Mansfield, J., Lipson, S., Brenneman, K. S., & Pawlson, L. G. (2001). Health status of participants of adult day care centers. Journal of Health and Social Policy , 14 (2), 71–89. doi.org/10.1300/j045v14n02_05
Committee on Population, & National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2015). Strengthening the Scientific Foundation for Policymaking to meet the challenges of aging in Latin America and the Caribbean: Summary of a Workshop. National Academies Press. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26512392/
del-Pino-Casado, R., Priego-Cubero, E., López-Martínez, C., & Orgeta, V. (2021). Subjective caregiver burden and anxiety in informal caregivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE , 16 (3), e0247143. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247143
Dyer, S. M., Valeri, M., Arora, N., Tilden, D., & Crotty, M. (2020). Is Australia over‐reliant on residential aged care to support our older population? Medical Journal of Australia , 213 (4), 156. doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50670
Fang, K. Y., Maeder, A. J., & Bjering, H. (2016). Current trends in electronic medication reminders for self care. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics , 231 , 31–41. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27782014
Gruber, J., & McGarry, K. (2023, November). Long-term care around the world. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/books-and-chapt...e-around-world
Haley, W. E., Roth, D. L., Sheehan, O. C., Rhodes, J. D., Huang, J., Blinka, M. D., & Howard, V. J. (2020). Effects of transitions to family caregiving on well-being: A longitudinal population-based study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 68 (12), 2839–2846. doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16778
Hallstrom, L. (2023, September 13). Total and percentage of elderly in nursing homes: 2023 data. https://www.aplaceformom.com/senior-...ome-population
Ho, S. C., Chan, A. C. M., Woo, J., Chong, P. Y. Y., & Sham, A. (2009). Impact of caregiving on health and quality of life: A comparative population-based study of caregivers for elderly persons and noncaregivers. The Journals of Gerontology , 64A (8), 873–879. doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glp034
Kaldy, J., Esposito, L., & Howley, E. K. (2024, July 17). Nursing home costs and how to pay. U.S. News & World Report . health.usnews.com/best-nursi...ing-home-costs
Kalideen, L., van Wyk, J. M., & Govender, P. (2022). Demographic and clinical profiles of residents in long-term care facilities in South Africa: A cross-sectional survey. African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine , 14 (1). https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v14i1.3131
Kasper, J. D., Freedman, V. A., Spillman, B. C., & Wolff, J. L. (2015). The disproportionate impact of dementia on family and unpaid caregiving to older adults. Health Affairs , 34 (10), 1642–1649. doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0536
Kasper, J. D., Wolff, J. L., & Skehan, M. (2018). Care arrangements of older adults: What they prefer, what they have, and implications for quality of life. Gerontologist 59 (5), 845–855. doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny127
Katz, S. A. (1983). Assessing self-maintenance: Activities of daily living, mobility, and instrumental activities of daily living. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society , 31 (12), 721–727. doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1983.tb03391.x
Kim, A., & Woo, K. M. (2022). Gender differences in the relationship between informal caregiving and subjective health: The mediating role of health promoting behaviors. BMC Public Health , 22 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12612-3
Konetzka, R. T., Yan, K., & Werner, R. M. (2021). Two decades of nursing home compare: What have we learned? Medical Care Research and Review , 78 (4), 295–310. doi.org/10.1177/1077558720931652
Labit, A., & Dubost, N. (2016). Housing and ageing in France and Germany: The intergenerational solution. Housing, Care and Support, 19 (2), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1108/HCS-08-2016-0007
Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist , 9 (3, Part 1), 179–186. doi.org/10.1093/geront/9.3_part_1.179
Lee, S.-H., Chon, Y., & Kim, Y.-Y. (2023). Comparative analysis of long-term care in OECD countries: Focusing on long-term care financing type. Healthcare, 11 (2), 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11020206
Lee, Y., & Tang, F. (2015). More caregiving, less working: Caregiving roles and gender difference. Journal of Applied Gerontology , 34 (4), 465–483. doi.org/10.1177/0733464813508649
Lim, S., Mohaimin, S., Min, D., Roberts, T., Sohn, Y.-J., Wong, J., Sivanesathurai, R., Kwon, S. C., & Trinh-Shevrin, C. (2020). Alzheimer's disease and its related dementias among Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders: A scoping review. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 77 (2), 523–537. doi.org/10.3233/JAD-200509
Liu, C., Badana, A. N. S., Burgdorf, J., Fabius, C. D., Roth, D. L., & Haley, W. E. (2021). Systematic review and meta-analysis of racial and ethnic differences in dementia caregivers' well-being. The Gerontologist, 61 (5), e228–e243. doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa028
Marek, K. D., Popejoy, L., Petroski, G., Mehr, D. R., Rantz, M., & Lin, W.-C. (2005). Clinical outcomes of aging in place. Nursing Research , 54 (3), 202–211. doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200505000-00008
Maryville University. (2023, September 4). A caregiver’s guide to understanding, recognizing, and preventing elder abuse . https://nursing.maryville.edu/blog/c...der-abuse.html
Medicare.gov (n.d.). How to get prescription drug coverage. https://www.medicare.gov/drug-covera...-drug-coverage
Nadash, P., Tell, E. J., & Jansen, T. (2023). What do family caregivers want? Payment for providing 2care. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 36 (4), 547–561. doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2022.2127599
National Council on Aging. (2024, July 8). Get the facts on elder abuse. https://www.ncoa.org/article/get-the...on-elder-abuse
National Council on Aging. (2023, April 19). 80% of older Americans cannot pay for long-term care or withstand a financial shock, new study shows. https://ncoa.org/article/80-percent-...ew-study-shows
National Institute on Aging. (2023, October 12). Long-term care facilities: Assisted living, nursing homes, and other residential care . www.nia.nih.gov/health/resid...-nursing-homes
Ng, T., Harrington, C., & Kitchener, M. J. (2010). Medicare and Medicaid in long-term care. Health Affairs , 29 (1), 22–28. doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0494
O’Brien, K. L., Liggett, A., Ramirez-Zohfeld, V., Sunkara, P., & Lindquist, L. A. (2019). Voice‐controlled intelligent personal assistants to support aging in place. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society , 68 (1), 176–179. doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16217
Ollevier, A., Aguiar, G., Palomino, M. A., & Simpelaere, I. S. (2020). How can technology support ageing in place in healthy older adults? A systematic review. Public Health Reviews , 41 , 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-020-00143-4
Pashmdarfard, M., & Azad, A. (2020). Assessment tools to evaluate activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) in older adults: A systematic review. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 34 (1), 224–239. https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.34.33
Perkins, M., Howard, V. J., Wadley, V. G., Crowe, M., Safford, M. M., Haley, W. E., Howard, G., & Roth, D. (2012). Caregiving strain and all-cause mortality: Evidence from the REGARDS study. Journals of Gerontology Series B , 68 (4), 504–512. doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs084
Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2006). Gender differences in caregiver stressors, social resources, and health: An updated meta-analysis. The Journals of Gerontology Series B , 61 (1), 33–45. doi.org/10.1093/geronb/61.1.p33
Potter, A. J., & Bowblis, J. R. (2021). Nursing home care under Medicaid managed long‐term services and supports. Health Services Research , 56 (6), 1179–1189. doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13701
Rau, J. (2023, Nov. 14). What long-term care looks like around the world. The New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2023/11/14/h...ce-global.html
Robledo, L. M. G., Cano-Gutiérrez, C. A., & García, E. V. (2022). Healthcare for older people in Central and South America. Age And Ageing , 51 (5), afac017. doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afac017
Schulz, R., Beach, S. R., Czaja, S. J., Martire, L. M., & Monin, J. K. (2020). Family caregiving for older adults. Annual Review of Psychology, 71 , 635–659. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050754
Sengupta, M., Lendon, J. P., Caffrey, C., Melekin, A., & Singh, P. (2022). Post-acute and long-term care providers and services users in the United States, 2017–2018. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Statistics, 3 (47). https://dx.doi.org/10.15620/cdc:115346 .
Shuman, T. (2024, July 8). Independent living costs in 2024. Seniorliving.org. https://www.seniorliving.org/indepen...-living/costs/
Storey, J. E. (2020). Risk factors for elder abuse and neglect: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior , 50 , 101339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.101339
Tuohy, D., Kingston, L., Carey, E., Graham, M., Dore, L., & Doody, O. (2023). A scoping review on the psychosocial interventions used in day care service for people living with dementia. PLOS ONE , 18 (12), e0295507. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295507
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. (n.d.). Congregate Housing Services Program (CHSP) . https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/.../progdesc/chsp
Velkoff, V. A., & Kowal, P. R. (2007). Aging in sub-Saharan Africa: The changing demography of the region. Aging in sub-Saharan Africa: Recommendations for furthering research , 55–91. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK20301/
Vitaliano, P. P., Young, H. M., & Zhang, J. (2004). Is caregiving a risk factor for illness? Current Directions in Psychological Science , 13 (1), 13–16. doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01301004.x
Weissberger, G. H., Goodman, M. C., Mosqueda, L., Schoen, J., Nguyen, A. L., Wilber, K. H., Gassoumis, Z. D., Nguyen, C. P., & Han, S. D. (2019). Elder abuse characteristics based on calls to the National Center on Elder Abuse Resource Line. Journal of Applied Gerontology , 39 (10), 1078–1087. doi.org/10.1177/0733464819865685
World Health Organization. (2024, June 15). Abuse of older people. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-s...f-older-people
Zallman, L., Finnegan, K. E., Himmelstein, D. U., Touw, S., & Woolhandler, S. (2019). Care for America's elderly and disabled people relies on immigrant labor. Health Affairs (Project Hope), 38 (6), 919–926. doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05514
Zawaly, K., Ripat, J., Guse, L., Katz, A., Edwards, J., & Sibley, K. M. (2022). Re-braiding the strands of life through community rehabilitation, home care, and informal support: A longitudinal collective case study. Canadian Journal on Aging , 42 (1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0714980822000137