9.6: Resources and References
- Page ID
- 76854
Review
Key Points
- Greenhouse gases have played an important role in the regulation of the Earth’s climate since the planet developed an atmosphere. However, the sudden increase of anthropogenic emissions during the Anthropocene is disrupting that regulation.
- Besides the general increase of average surface temperatures, global warming is causing complex patterns of climate change that vary among regions and latitudes. In addition, the world’s oceans are becoming more acidic, sea levels are rising, permafrost is melting and ocean currents may change.
- The effects of climate change on natural systems affects the ranges of species and generally reduces biodiversity. The changes are occurring faster than natural systems could adapt.
- The effects of climate change on human security operate partly through those biotic effects and partly they arise from severe weather, droughts, crop failures and the displacement of ever larger populations. Especially threatening are the inundation of densely populated coastal plains and shortages of fresh water.
- Those impacts are affecting the world’s poorest most severely, while the levels of GHG emissions are highest with developed countries.
- Climate change can be addressed in principle by prevention, mitigation and adaptation. Apart from preventing the worst outcomes, the emphasis now lies on mitigating its impacts and adapting to those impacts that have become inevitable. The goal is to maximize human security in equitable and just ways.
- Barriers to effective countermeasures are technological, cultural and political. Other sources of human insecurity such as overconsumption, overpopulation, industrial growth, militarization and economic inequity render those countermeasures more difficult to achieve.
.Extension Activities & Further Research
- Who are the victims of climate change? While this chapter focused on human inequities, can you think of others?
- While the harm of climate change is undeniable, whether it constitutes an injustice is a matter of personal ethics. Where do you stand on that? Would you extend your interpretation of justice to include nonhumans, ecosystems and the biosphere?
- Identify the major issues and challenges that characterise British Columbia’s transition towards climate neutrality. In what ways are you contributing personally to the problems and to the solutions?
- Explore the interactive presentation of the ‘Global Conveyor Belt.’ Speculate how it is likely to affect the climate of your home region, and how that climate might change if the currents change.
List of Terms
See Glossary for full list of terms and definitions.
- abatement technologies
- climate justice
- divestment
- equity and equality
- Hothouse Earth scenario
- keystone species
- marginalized communities
- mitigation and adaptation
- resilience
- SDG #13
- status quo bias
Suggested Reading
Engel, J., & Gross, D. (2019). The decolonial atlas. https://decolonialatlas.wordpress.com
Levin, K. (2018, October 7) Half a degree and a world apart: The difference in climate impacts between 1.5°C and 2°C of warming. World Resources Institute. Retrieved August 28, 2019, from https://www.wri.org/blog/2018/10/hal...nd-2-c-warming
Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury.
Steffen, W., Rockström, J., Richardson, K., Lenton, T. M., Folke, C., Liverman, D., Summerhayes, C. P., Barnosky, A. D., Cornell, S. E., Crucifix, M., Donges, J. F., Fetzer, I., Lade, S. J., Scheffer, M., Winkelmann, R., & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2018). Trajectories of the Earth system in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(33), 8252–8259. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810141115
Wynes, S., & Nicholas, K. A. (2017). The climate mitigation gap: Education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions. Environmental Research Letters, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7541
References
Auzanneau, M. (2018). Oil, power, and war: A dark history. Chelsea Green Publishing.
Bertrand, M., Hanna, R., & Mullainathan, S. (2010). Affirmative action in education: Evidence from engineering college admissions in India. Journal of Public Economics, 94(1–2), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.11.003
Billion Oyster Project. (2019). Our story. https://billionoysterproject.org/about/our-story/
Boulais, M., Chenevert, K. J., Demey, A. T., Darrow, E. S., Robison, M. R., Roberts, J. P., & Volety, A. (2017). Oyster reproduction is compromised by acidification experienced seasonally in coastal regions. Scientific Reports, 7, Article 13276. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13480-3
Boyle, G. (Ed.). (2004). Renewable energy (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Britton, D., Cornwall, C. E., Revill, A. T., Hurd, C. L., & Johnson, C. R. (2016). Ocean acidification reverses the positive effects of seawater pH fluctuations on growth and photosynthesis of the habitat-forming kelp, Ecklonia radiata. Scientific Reports, 6, Article 26036. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26036
C40 Cities. (n.d.). Staying afloat: The urban response to sea level rise. https://www.c40.org/other/the-future...sea-level-rise
Church, J. A., Clark, P. U., Cazenave, A., Gregory, J. M., Jevrejeva, S., Levermann, A., Merrifield, M. A., Milne, G. A., Nerem, R. S., Nunn, P. D., Payne, A. J., Pfeffer, W. T., Stammer, D., & Unnikrishnan, A. S. (2013). Sea level change. In T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, & P. M. Midgley (Eds.), Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1137–1216). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.026
DC Department of Energy & Environment. (2018). Clean energy DC: The District of Columbia climate and energy action plan. https://doee.dc.gov/cleanenergydc
Doney, S. C., Fabry, V. J., Feely, R. A., & Kleypas, J. A. (2009). Ocean acidification: The other CO2 problem. Annual Review of Marine Science, 1, 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163834
Engel, J., & Gross, D. (2019). The decolonial atlas. https://decolonialatlas.wordpress.com
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2016). FAO response to the Syria crisis: A call for increased support in agriculture. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_up...SC_2016_EN.pdf
Ge, M., & Friedrich, J. (2020, February 6). 4 Charts explain greenhouse gas emissions by countries and sectors. World Resources Institute. https://www.wri.org/blog/2020/02/gre...country-sector
Giroux, H. A. (2010). The media and Hurricane Katrina: Floating bodies and disposable populations. In G. Martin, D. Houston, P. McLaren, & J. Suoranta (Eds.), The havoc of capitalism: Publics, pedagogies and environmental crisis (pp. 29–51). Brill.
Gleick, P. H. (2014). Water, drought, climate change, and conflict in Syria. Weather, Climate, and Society, 6(3), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00059.1
Griffin, P. (2017). The Carbon Majors Database: CDP Carbon Majors Report 2017. Carbon Disclosure Project Worldwide. http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.or...eport-2017.pdf
Gruber, N., Clement, D., Carter, B. R., Feely, R. A., van Heuven, S., Hoppema, M., Ishii, M., Key, R. M., Kozyr, A., Lauvset, S. K., Lo Monaco, C., Mathis, J. T., Murata, A., Olsen, A., Perez, F. F., Sabine, C. L., Tanhua, T., & Wanninkhof, R. (2019). The oceanic sink for anthropogenic CO2 from 1994 to 2007. Science, 363(6432), 1193–1199. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau5153
Guppy, L., & Anderson, K. (2017). Global water crisis: The facts. Institute for Water, Environment and Health, United Nations University. https://inweh.unu.edu/global-water-crisis-the-facts/
Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Jacob, D., Taylor, M., Bindi, M., Brown, S., Camilloni, I., Diedhiou, A., Djalante, R., Ebi, K. L., Engelbrecht, F., Guiot, J., Hijioka, Y., Mehrotra, S., Payne, A., Seneviratne, S. I., Thomas, A., Warren, R., & Zhou, G. (2018). Impacts of 1.5°C global warming on natural and human systems. In Global warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC Special Report (ch. 3). IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/
Human Rights & Climate Change Working Group. (n.d.). Promoting the Geneva Pledge for Human Rights in Climate Action. https://climaterights.org/our-work/u...geneva-pledge/
Human Rights Watch. (2019). World report 2019: Syria. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/201...chapters/syria
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2014a). Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability – Part B: Regional aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uplo...artB_FINAL.pdf
IPCC. (2014b). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uplo...ull_wcover.pdf
IPCC. (2014c). Climate change 2014 synthesis report: Summary for policymakers. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uplo..._FINAL_SPM.pdf
IPCC. (2019, November 4). Scenario process for AR5. https://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/dd...ackground.html
International Renewable Energy Agency. (2019). Global energy transformation: A roadmap to 2050. https://www.irena.org/publications/2...50-2019Edition
Jevrejeva, S., Jackson, L. P., Grinsted, A., Lincke, D., & Marzeion, B. (2018). Flood damage costs under the sea level rise with warming of 1.5°C and 2°C. Environmental Research Letters, 13(7), Article 074014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aacc76
Kämpf, J., & Chapman, P. (2016). The functioning of coastal upwelling systems. In J. Kämpf & P. Chapman, Upwelling systems of the world: A scientific journey to the most productive marine ecosystems (pp. 31–65). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42524-5_2
Kelley, C. P, Mohtadi, S., Cane, M. A., Seager, R., & Kushnir, Y. (2015). Climate change in the Fertile Crescent and implications of the recent Syrian drought. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(11), 3241–3246. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1421533112
Knutson, T. R., McBride, J. L., Chan, J., Emanuel, K., Holland, G., Landsea, C., Held, I., Kossin, J. P., Srivastava, A. K., & Sugi, M. (2010). Tropical cyclones and climate change. Nature Geoscience, 3(3), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo779
Kumar, R., Jawale, P., & Tandon, S. (2008). Economic impact of climate change on Mumbai, India. Regional Health Forum, 12(1), 38–42. World Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/205777
Levin, K. (2018, October 7) Half a degree and a world apart: The difference in climate impacts between 1.5°C and 2°C of warming. World Resources Institute. Retrieved August 28, 2019, from https://www.wri.org/blog/2018/10/hal...nd-2-c-warming
Mayer, J. (2017). Dark money: The hidden history of the billionaires behind the rise of the radical right. Anchor Books.
Mendez, D. D., Hogan, V. K., & Culhane, J. F. (2014). Institutional racism, neighborhood factors, stress, and preterm birth. Ethnicity & Health, 19(5), 479–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2013.846300
National Hurricane Center. (2018, January 26). Costliest U.S. tropical cyclones tables updated [Press release]. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/news/UpdatedCostliest.pdf
National Ocean Service. (n.d.). The global conveyor belt. https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/educat...conveyor2.html
Nicholls, R. J., Hanson, S., Herweijer, C., Patmore, N., Hallegatte, S., Corfee-Morlot, J., Château, J., & Muir-Wood, R. (2008). Ranking port cities with high exposure and vulnerability to climate extremes (OECD Environment Working Papers No. 1). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/011766488208
Ocean circulation is changing, and we need to know why [Editorial]. (2018). Nature, 556(7700), 149. https://doi.org/
Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Press.
Oxfam. (2015, December 2). Extreme carbon inequality: Why the Paris climate deal must put the poorest, lowest emitting and most vulnerable people first [Media briefing]. https://www-cdn.oxfam.org/s3fs-publi...-021215-en.pdf
Parks, B. C., & Roberts, J. T. (2010). Climate change, social theory and justice. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2–3), 134–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409359018
Petersen, A. M., Vincent, E. M., Westerling, A. L. (2019). Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians. Nature Communications, 10, Article 3502. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09959-4
Pfahl, S., O’Gorman, P. A., & Fischer, E. M. (2017). Understanding the regional pattern of projected future changes in extreme precipitation. Nature Climate Change, 7(6), 423–427. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3287
Richardson, M. (2018). Climate trauma, or the affects of the catastrophe to come. Environmental Humanities, 10(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-4385444
Ritchie, H. (2017). Fossil fuels. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/fossil-fuels
Ritchie, H. (2018, October 16). Global inequalities in CO2 emissions. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-by-income-region
Robinson, E., & Robbins, R. C. (1968). Sources, abundance, and fate of gaseous atmospheric pollutants: Final report and supplement. Stanford Research Institute.
Rogelj, J., den Elzen, M., Höhne, N. Fransen, T., Fekete, H., Winkler, H., Schaeffer, R., Sha, F., Riahi, K., & Meinshausen, M. (2016). Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2°C. Nature, 534(7609), 631–639. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18307
Sambaraju, K. R., Carroll, A. L., & Aukema, B. H. (2019). Multiyear weather anomalies associated with range shifts by the mountain pine beetle preceding large epidemics. Forest Ecology and Management, 438, 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.02.011
Silverstein, K. (2015). The secret world of oil. Verso Books.
Simonsen, S. H., Biggs, R. (O.)., Schlüter, M., Schoon, M., Bohensky, E., Cundill, G., Dakos, V., Daw, T., Kotschy, K., Leitch, A., Quinlan, A., Peterson, G., & Moberg, F. (n.d.). Applying resilience thinking: Seven principles for building resilience in social-ecological systems [Brochure]. Stockholm Resilience Centre. https://www.stockholmresilience.org/...ce%20final.pdf
Smale, D. A., Wernberg, T., Oliver, E. C. J., Thomsen, M., Harvey, B. P., Straub, S. C., Burrows, M. T., Alexander, L. V., Benthuysen, J. A., Donat, M. G., Feng, M., Hobday, A. J., Holbrook, N. J., Perkins-Kirkpatrick, S. E., Scannell, H. A., Gupta, A. S., Payne, B. L., & Moore, P. J. (2019). Marine heatwaves threaten global biodiversity and the provision of ecosystem services. Nature Climate Change, 9(4), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0412-1
Sönnichsen, N. (2020). Total fossil fuel extraction in the United Kingdom (UK) from 1998 to 2017. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/...ed-kingdom-uk/
Steffen, W., Rockström, J., Richardson, K., Lenton, T. M., Folke, C., Liverman, D., Summerhayes, C. P., Barnosky, A. D., Cornell, S. E., Crucifix, M., Donges, J. F., Fetzer, I., Lade, S. J., Scheffer, M., Winkelmann, R., & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2018). Trajectories of the Earth system in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(33), 8252–8259. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810141115
United Nations. (n.d.). #Envision2030 goal 13: Climate action. https://www.un.org/development/desa/...30-goal13.html
UN High Commissioner for Refugees. (2019). Syria regional refugee response. Refugees Operational Data Portal. https://data2.unhcr.org/en/situation...182.1565844576
van Vuuren, D. P., Edmonds, J., Kainuma, M., Riahi, K., Thomson, A., Hibbard, K., Hurtt, G. C., Kram, T., Krey, V., Lamarque, J.-F., Masui, T., Meinshausen, M., Nakicenovic, N., Smith, S. J., & Rose, S. K. (2011). The representative concentration pathways: An overview. Climate Change, 109(1–2), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z
Whiticar, M. (2016). B.C. energy maps. EnergyBC. http://www.energybc.ca/index.html
Woodbury, Z. (2019). Climate trauma: Toward a new taxonomy of trauma. Ecopsychology, 11(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2018.0021
World Health Organization. (2017). World health statistics 2017: Monitoring health for the SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals). https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/...pdf?sequence=1
World Ocean Review. (2010). The great ocean currents: The climate engine. https://worldoceanreview.com/en/wor-...cean-currents/
Wynes, S., & Nicholas, K. A. (2017). The climate mitigation gap: Education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions. Environmental Research Letters, 12(7), Article 074024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7541
Long Descriptions
Figure 9.2 long description: Scatter plot of \(\ce{CO2}\) emissions per capita versus GDP per capita in 2016. The subtitle says, “Carbon dioxide (\(\ce{CO2}\)) emissions per capita are measured in tonnes per person per year. Gross domestic product (GDP) per capita is measured in international dollars in 2011 prices to adjust for price differences between countries and adjust for inflation.” On the x-axis is GDP per capita, and on the y-axis is \(\ce{CO2}\) emissions per capita.
The scatter plot shows the general trend that a country with a larger GDP per capita also has greater \(\ce{CO2}\) emissions per capita. Most points are bunched closely together on a diagonal that goes from the bottom-left corner to the top-right corner. Data points differ in size, most likely because of population.
Here are some individual data points, with exact figures taken from this interactive version of the \(\ce{CO2}\) emissions per capita versus GDP per capita scatter plot:
- In the bottom-left corner is Burundi, with a tiny dot representing GDP per capita of 665 international dollars and 0.05 tonnes of \(\ce{CO2}\) emissions per capita.
- In the middle of the lower end of the pack is Kenya, with a small dot representing a GDP per capita of 3,169 international dollars and 0.35 tonnes of \(\ce{CO2}\) emissions per capita.
- Closer to the centre is Indonesia, with a mid-sized dot representing a GDP per capita of 10,911 international dollars and 2.14 tonnes of \(\ce{CO2}\) emissions per capita.
- China, near the centre and above Indonesia, has the largest dot, representing a GDP per capita of 12,569 international dollars and 6.86 tonnes of \(\ce{CO2}\) emissions per capita.
- The United States, with a relatively large dot close to the top-right corner, has a GDP per capita of 53,015 international dollars and 16.43 tonnes of \(\ce{CO2}\) emissions per capita.
- Qatar is closest to the top-right corner, with a tiny dot representing a GDP per capita of 156,029 international dollars and 41.23 tonnes of \(\ce{CO2}\) emissions per capita.
Figure 9.3 long description: Cartogram of carbon emissions with many cities labelled. The caption says, “100 companies are responsible for most of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions. These are the names and locations of their executives. Country sizes depict cumulative \(\ce{CO2}\) emissions from 1850–2011.” Beneath each labelled city are the names and companies of the executives who live there.
The cities with the most executives from top-polluting companies are Houston (seven), Jakarta (five), Calgary (four), Moscow (four), Beijing (four), and Johannesburg-Pretoria (three). Many of the companies whose executives are shown on the map produce oil or energy. Executives are depicted in every corner of the world. Some of the most distorted countries are the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, South Africa, Japan, and South Korea.
Figure 9.4 long description: Breakdown of the sources of greenhouse gas emissions since 1751.
This chart shows that 52 per cent of industrial green house gases emitted since 1751 have come from 100 producers of fossil fuels. Out of those 100 top producers, 41 are public investor–owned, 16 are private investor–owned, 36 are state-owned, and seven are state producers. Those 100 entities have generated 923 billion tonnes of \(\ce{CO2}\) equivalents.
The other 48 per cent of industrial greenhouse gases emitted since 1751 have come from the rest of the world, totalling 852 billion tonnes of \(\ce{CO2}\) equivalents. Just a sliver of that 48 per cent (perhaps 5 per cent) of emissions have come from the poorer half of humanity.
Figure 9.5 long description: Bar graph depicting the emissions savings of certain personal choices, measured in tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents (t\(\ce{CO2}\)e) per year. Actions are coded as high impact (saving more than 0.8 t\(\ce{CO2}\)e), moderate impact (saving 0.2 to 0.8 t\(\ce{CO2}\)e), and low impact (saving less than 0.2 t\(\ce{CO2}\)e). Where information is available, the average impact of personal choices in particular countries is indicated.
The action with the highest impact by far is choosing to have one fewer child, which saves an average of 58.6 t\(\ce{CO2}\)e per year and an average of 117.7 t\(\ce{CO2}\)e per year in the United States. Other high-impact personal choices include the choice to live car free, avoid one transatlantic flight, buy green energy, buy a more efficient car, switch from an electric car to a car-free lifestyle, and to adopt a plant-based diet, all of which save between 0.8 and 2.4 t\(\ce{CO2}\)e per year on average.
Some actions have greater impact in particular countries. For example, living car free saves an average of 3.08 and 3.04 t\(\ce{CO2}\)e per year in the United States and Australia, respectively, compared to 2.4 t\(\ce{CO2}\)e per year on average around the world. Buying green energy in Canada and Australia saves an average of 2.51 and 2.2 t\(\ce{CO2}\)e per year, respectively, compared to 1.5 t\(\ce{CO2}\)e per year on average around the world.
Moderate-impact actions include the choice to replace a gasoline-powered car with a hybrid, wash clothes in cold water, recycle, and hang clothes to dry, all of which save between 0.2 and 0.8 t\(\ce{CO2}\)e per year on average.
The one low-impact action depicted is the choice to upgrade light bulbs, which saves an average of 0.10 t\(\ce{CO2}\)e per year.
.Footnote
- The major greenhouse gases include water vapour, carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and ozone. Problematic is not their natural production (which has long kept our planet hospitable) but their excessive, anthropogenic emission in recent decades, including synthetic GHGs such as chlorofluorocarbons and hydrofluorocarbons.
- (See Climate change has caused an 89% decrease in new coral in the Great Barrier Reef, study finds.)
- The costs of work disruption and material damage, as well as mortality costs (loss of earnings) have been computed on the basis of a conservative approach wherein it has been assumed that flooding would be limited to five days in a year and also that the frequency of such extreme occurrences shall be once every five years. The computation has been limited to the year 2050. It also conservatively assumes that the population in these areas will not change, though it would change depending upon the local government policy of development relevant to the time frame up to 2050. Population figures have been taken from the census for locations shown in Figure 9.1 based on the area and density of population.
- See Footnote #3.
- See Footnote #3.
- Increase in the incidence of malaria, diarrhoea and leptospirosis would result in loss of income due to non-working days and deaths. Losses have been computed using Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for all the major illnesses likely to impact the population. Incidence of all these illnessses will increase steadily with increase in income loss; a sharp increase is likely from 2045 to 2055. By 2050 the cumulative income loss due to malaria, diarrhoea and leptospirosis, calculated on the basis of DALYs will be 155 597 and 2401 crores [1 crore = 100,000], respectively. The calculation of DALYs is based on the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines 8 and 9, and income levels prevalent for Mumbai.
- Due to sea-level rise there will be loss of coastal area and ingress of sea water. Assuming that sea water penetrates 200 m inland, calculations have been made showing the monetary loss due to buildings getting affected in the region near the shore. The current loss has been computed on the basis of the present value of buildings. This is based on the assumption that buildings along the coastline located within 200 m from the shore will get affected due to rise in the sea level and ingress of sea water.
- Calculations are based on Tourism Statistics of India10. Future costs have been calculated using the average gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate of India. It also takes the current rates of 6% and 13% increase respectively in domestic and foreign tourism per year into account.
- In the context of environmental challenges to social-ecological systems, resilience is defined by the Stockholm Resilience Centre as “the capacity of a system, be it an individual, a forest, a city or an economy, to deal with change and continue to develop. It is about how humans and nature can use shocks and disturbances like a financial crisis or climate change to spur renewal and innovative thinking.” (https://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/research-news/2015-02-19-what-is-resilience.html accessed 2 Aug 2019; See also Simonsen et al., 2014)
- See also Giroux, H.A., 2010. “The Media and Hurricane Katrina: Floating Bodies and Disposable Populations”, pp. 29-51.
- See Ram M., D. Bogdanov, A. Aghahosseini, A.S. Oyewo, A. Gulagi, M. Child, H-J. Fell & C. Breyer. Global Energy System Based on 100% Renewable Energy – Power Sector. Study by Lappeenranta University of Technology and Energy Watch Group, Lappeenranta, Berlin, November 2017.
- See Jacobson, M.Z., M.A. Delucchi, Z.A. Bauer, S.C. Goodman, W.E. Chapman, M.A. Cameron, … & J.R. Erwin. 2017. 100% clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight all-sector energy roadmaps for 139 countries of the world. Joule 1(1): 108-121.
- See About fossil free divestment by the 350.org website.
- See and download the US Congress resolution Recognizing the duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New Deal.