Once the mental health professional makes a formal diagnosis, he or she then analyzes the factors that may have influenced the patient or client’s current psychological state. A clinical formulation, also known as case formulation or case conceptualization, is that analysis, or a theoretically based explanation of the information obtained from a clinical assessment. It offers a hypothesis about the cause and nature of the presenting problems (e.g., background history, presenting concerns, and manifestation and progression of behavioral signs and symptoms over time), and is considered an adjunct or alternative approach to the more categorical approach of psychiatric diagnosis. These formulations are used to communicate a hypothesis and provide a framework for developing the most suitable treatment approach, rather than labels or diagnostic codes. It gives a rich description of the client’s personal history and pieces together how the disorder evolved. It is most commonly used by clinical psychologists and psychiatrists and is deemed to be a core component of these professions. Mental health nurses and social workers may also use formulations. As mental health professionals, we need to consider both the purpose of our communication and the audience for that communication. As professionals, we must also consider the potential misuse of documents by others, which will influence the way that we present our case formulation.
Types of Formulation
Different psychological schools or models utilize clinical formulations, including cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and related therapies: systemic therapy, psychodynamic therapy, and applied behavior analysis. The structure and content of a clinical formulation is determined by the psychological model (which we will examine more closely in another module). Most systems of formulation contain the following broad categories of information:
- symptoms and problems
- precipitating stressors or events
- predisposing life events or stressors
- an explanatory mechanism that links the preceding categories together
- a description of the precipitants and maintaining influences of the person’s problems
Many psychologists use an integrative psychotherapy approach to formulation, or the integration of elements from different schools of psychotherapy in the treatment of a client. This is to take advantage of the benefits of resources from each model the psychologist is trained in, according to the patient’s needs. The case formulation may pull from several psychological models and formations, such as those mentioned below:
- A cognitive-behavioral model of formulation described by Jacqueline Persons has seven components: problem list, core beliefs, precipitants and activating situations, origins, working hypothesis, treatment plan, and predicted obstacles to treatment.
- A psychodynamic formulation would consist of a summarizing statement, description of nondynamic factors, description of core psychodynamics using a specific model (such as ego psychology, object relations, or self psychology), and prognostic assessment that identifies the potential areas of resistance in therapy.
- Behavioral case formulations used in applied behavior analysis and behavior therapy are built on a rank list of problem behaviors. Such functional analysis is also used in acceptance and commitment therapy. Functional analysis looks at setting events (ecological variables, history effects, and motivating operations); antecedents; behavior chains; the problem behavior; and the consequences, short- and long-term, for the behavior
Watch this video to see all the components that go into a case formulation for a client. The video specifically mentions one type of therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), but the concepts apply generally to all types of psychotherapy.
You can view the transcript for “ACT Case Conceptualization: Assessing the 6 Core Processes” here (opens in new window).
Cultural Formulation
A cultural formulation is the systematic review of a person’s cultural background and the role of culture in the manifestation of symptoms and dysfunction. It is argued that a cultural perspective can help psychiatrists become aware of the hidden assumptions and limitations of current psychiatric theory and practice and can identify new approaches appropriate for treating the increasingly diverse populations seen in psychiatric services around the world. The DSM-5 includes a Cultural Formulation Interview that aims to help clinicians contextualize diagnostic assessment. A related approach to cultural assessment involves cultural consultation that works with interpreters and cultural brokers to develop a cultural formulation and treatment plan that can assist clinicians.
Cross-cultural psychiatry (also known as ethnopsychiatry, transcultural psychiatry, or cultural psychiatry) is a branch of psychiatry concerned with the cultural context of mental disorders and the challenges of addressing ethnic diversity in psychiatric services. It looks at whether psychiatric classifications of disorders are appropriate to different cultures or ethnic groups. It often argues that psychiatric illnesses represent social constructs as well as genuine medical conditions, and as such have social uses peculiar to the social groups in which they are created and legitimized. It studies psychiatric classifications in different cultures, whether informal (e.g., category terms used in different languages) or formal (for example the World Health Organization’s ICD, the American Psychiatric Association’s DSM, or the Chinese Society of Psychiatry’s CCMD). The field has increasingly had to address the process of globalization. It is said every city has a different culture and that the urban environment, and how people adapt or struggle to adapt to it, can play a crucial role in the onset or worsening of mental illness.
Reflecting advances in medical anthropology, the DSM-5 replaced the term culture-bound syndrome (or folk illness—a combination of psychiatric and somatic symptoms that are considered to be a recognizable disease only within a specific society or culture) with a set of terms covering cultural concepts of distress: cultural syndromes (which may not be bound to a specific culture but circulate across cultures), cultural idioms of distress (local modes of expressing suffering that may not be syndromes), causal explanations (that attribute symptoms or suffering to specific causal factors rooted in local ontologies), and folk diagnostic categories (which may be part of ethnomedical systems and healing practices).
One argument to support the concept of culture-bound syndromes comes from research on dhat syndrome, as it has been specified as a culture-bound syndrome specific to the culture of the Indian subcontinent. The DSM-4 listed it as a folk diagnostic term used in India to refer to severe anxiety and hypochondriacal concerns associated with the discharge of semen, whitish discoloration of the urine, and feelings of weakness and exhaustion. Similar to jiryan (India), sukra prameha (Sri Lanka), and shen-k’uei (China), dhat syndrome in the DSM-5 is listed as a term that was coined in South Asia little more than half a century ago to account for common clinical presentations of young male patients who attributed their various symptoms to semen loss. Despite the name, it is not a discrete syndrome but rather a cultural explanation of distress for patients who refer to diverse symptoms, such as anxiety, fatigue, weakness, weight loss, impotence, other multiple somatic complaints, and depressive mood. The cardinal feature is anxiety and distress about the loss of dhat in the absence of any identifiable physiological dysfunction.
Research in health care settings has yielded diverse estimates of the syndrome’s prevalence (e.g., 64% of men attending psychiatric clinics in India for sexual complaints; 30% of men attending general clinics in Pakistan). Related conditions in DSM-5 are major depressive disorder, persistent depressive disorder (dysthymia), generalized anxiety disorder, somatic symptom disorder, illness anxiety disorder, erectile disorder, early (premature) ejaculation, and other specified or unspecified sexual dysfunction. [2]
Cultural influence has been shown to influence the appearance of psychiatric disorders. In the context of psychiatric disorders, cultural influence is present at multiple levels. First, culture and society shape the meanings and expressions people give to various emotions. Second, cultural factors determine which symptoms or signs are normal and abnormal. Third, culture helps define what compromises health and illness. Lastly, it shapes the illness behavior and help-seeking behavior. Overall, cultural influence on psychiatric disorders include conditions other than culture-bound disorders. The ongoing question about culture-bound syndrome continues as researchers ask themselves, “Does culture impact only the culture-bound syndrome?”