Skip to main content
Social Sci LibreTexts

10.4: When Things Get Tricky- Challenges of Intercultural Love and Friendship

  • Page ID
    309080
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\dsum}{\displaystyle\sum\limits} \)

    \( \newcommand{\dint}{\displaystyle\int\limits} \)

    \( \newcommand{\dlim}{\displaystyle\lim\limits} \)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    ( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \(\newcommand{\longvect}{\overrightarrow}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)

    Luis, a Latino student from Los Angeles, and Yi-Joon, a South Korean exchange student, were randomly paired as college roommates. Both were excited to learn from each other’s cultures, Luis admired Yi-Joon’s gaming skills, while Yi-Joon appreciated Luis’s warmth and humor. They bonded over late-night study sessions and swapped stories about growing up in different worlds.

    But soon, small tensions surfaced. Luis was puzzled when Yi-Joon avoided eye contact during serious talks, while Yi-Joon felt overwhelmed by Luis’s directness. Language barriers led to confusion, especially with slang, and their food preferences clashed: Luis’s spicy tacos and Yi-Joon’s fermented kimchi sparked more than one fridge negotiation.

    Despite these bumps, their friendship grew stronger through honest conversations and shared curiosity. They learned to laugh at misunderstandings, ask questions, and respect each other’s boundaries. As Luis later joked, “I didn’t know fermented cabbage could teach me so much about patience.”

    Intercultural relationships like theirs show that connection across differences takes effort, empathy, and a sense of humor. These challenges aren’t roadblocks, they can be viewed as opportunities for growth. Let’s explore some common challenges in intercultural relationships and how to navigate them with care.

    Couple Arguing.jpg

    Figure 10.4.1: A couple having an argument in their apartment.

    10.4.1 Different Expectations

    A communication expectation is like a personal belief about how people should interact in different situations. Our culture plays a huge role in shaping these expectations, along with other personal touches like our gender, age, religion, and all the experiences we've had. According to Burgoon’s Expectancy Violations Theory (2015), every culture has its own special ways of doing things, and when those norms are gently bent, like with differences in eye contact, personal space, or how direct we are, people might interpret the behavior in a positive or not-so-positive way, depending on the situation and the relationship.

    For instance, imagine two colleagues from different backgrounds meeting for the first time at a workshop. One greets the other with a warm hug, while the other was expecting a friendly handshake. This unexpected gesture creates a little moment of surprise, and how it’s received really depends on their cultural norms, the setting, and how they connect with each other. By understanding these wonderful, culturally rooted expectations and how people respond when they're challenged, we can improve our communication, clear up misunderstandings, and build more respectful, flexible, and heartfelt relationships across cultures.

    10.4.2 Underestimating the Impact of Culture

    People in intercultural or interracial relationships often downplay or underestimate the impact of culture. As we have learned previously in this text, we often take culture for granted and we assume our way of living and communicating is the "norm". However, when we develop close relationships with people from different cultures we learn different perspectives on communication and relationships. For example, when Michael and Reyna first started dating, he was surprised by how often her family called, visited, and weighed in on her decisions, he assumed they were just overly involved. But over time, he realized that Reyna, who comes from a close-knit Filipino household, saw family as a central source of support, not interference. What once felt overwhelming to Michael eventually became something he respected, and even appreciated, about her cultural values.

    10.4.3 Competing Cultural Values

    Friends, romantic partners, and families with a blending of different cultures may experience competing cultural values. Disagreements over topics such as religion, love, feelings, and boundaries can become common. To illustrate, when Alicia, who is Black and Baptist, and her husband Daniel, who is white and Jewish, became parents, they had to confront deeply held values regarding how they would raise their children. This conflict took on a life of its own because both sets of grandparents also had very strong opinions about how their grand-children should be raised. The life shift meant navigating old family expectations without defaulting to “what we grew up with.” To further understand how cultural values may impact relationships, check out the next challenges, exploring competing needs of individualism and collectivism.

    10.4.4 Differences in Preferences for Individualism and Collectivism

    Not only can our cultural values be a source of challenge and conflict in intercultural relationships, but our adherence to broad cultural patterns can shape our views towards relationships. One of the most influential orientations is our preference for individualism and collectivism. If you recall from Chapter 3, individualism and collectivism explains the degree to which we prefer an individual versus a group orientation in our lives.

    For example, Priya, who grew up in a collectivist Indian household, often felt torn when her American husband, Jake, emphasized personal boundaries and independence, especially when it came to family decisions. While Jake valued privacy and autonomy, Priya felt that involving her extended family was a sign of love and respect. Their differing expectations led to misunderstandings, especially around holidays and childcare, until they began to openly discuss how their cultural values shaped their views on connection and commitment.

    Cultural Close-Up

    The dimension of individualism and collectivism can play a significant role in our relationships, influencing everything from need for privacy and independence, to how we communicate and express our emotions. Here’s a helpful summary of relationship needs based on individualism and collectivism (Adapted from Ting-Toomey & Chung, 2012):

    Individualism and Collectivism in Relationships

    Individualism

    Collectivism

    High autonomy

    High connection

    Privacy needs

    Family connection needs

    Voluntary commitment

    Family commitment

    Low context communication

    High context communication

    Low context emotions

    High context emotions

    Discussion Questions

    1. “Roommates, Texts, and TMI”
      Imagine you’re living with a roommate from a culture that values high privacy and low-context communication, while you come from a culture that emphasizes high connection and high-context communication. What kinds of misunderstandings might pop up? How would you navigate them without turning your dorm into a drama zone?
    2. “Family First… or Me First?”
      Think about a time when your personal goals or independence clashed with family expectations—or imagine a friend in that situation. How might someone from a collectivist culture approach that conflict differently than someone from an individualist culture? What would “success” look like in each case?
    3. “Decode This!”
      You’re texting a friend who always uses emojis, inside jokes, and vague hints to express how they feel. You, on the other hand, prefer to say exactly what’s on your mind. How might your different emotional styles (low vs. high context) affect your friendship—and how could you meet in the middle?

    While frameworks like individualism and collectivism help us understand broad differences, relationships also challenge us to negotiate the more subtle, day-to-day perceived differences between ourselves and our partners.

    10.4.5 Perceived Differences

    While it is not uncommon to have different expectations from time to time, relationships also provide an opportunity to uncover differences about our friends and romantic partners, some of which we may find charming and others challenging. And while it is normal for people in romantic and friend relationships to perceive differences, when we add cultural and ethnic differences, we may find some surprising cultural differences.

    As we explored earlier in this course, the similarities-differences dialectic (Martin & Nakayama, 2025) reminds us that relationships are shaped by both shared experiences and distinct perspectives. This dialectic can present challenges to relationship development, especially when cultural differences are more visible than commonalities. Yet with mindful communication, we can begin to uncover shared values, goals, and ways of relating that might not be immediately obvious.

    Perceived differences in general also create anxiety and uncertainty that might not be present in intracultural relationships. People experience anxiety or fear about the possible negative consequences of their actions or from being uncertain how to act towards a person from a different culture. Some form of anxiety always exists in the early stages of any relationship, but being worried about offending someone or looking incompetent is more pronounced in intercultural relationships. The level of anxiety may even be higher if people have previous negative experiences. Once some similarities are found, the tension within the dialectic begins to balance out and uncertainty and anxiety lessen.

    As communicators, we can reframe differences not as a threat, but as an invitation to grow. When we approach intercultural relationships with curiosity, humility, and openness, we create space for deeper connection. Over time, as we discover points of similarity and learn to appreciate difference, the tension within the dialectic begins to soften. Anxiety can decrease, and the relationship becomes a source of enrichment, insight, and joy. However, it is important to be aware that unchecked perceptions can lead to racism, prejudice, and stereotypes.

    10.4.5 Facing Racism, Prejudice, and Stereotypes

    Racism, prejudice, and stereotypes can be both hurtful and harmful, and the unexpected prejudice people experience when forming intercultural relationships can catch people off guard. When forming relationships with people who are ethnically, racially, or culturally different, they may receive negative feedback from strangers as well as family and friends. Ting-Toomey and Chung (2021) note that family and friend reactions can range from support, to acceptance, to rejection, to fear and hostility. Negative stereotypes are powerful, and often take a conscious effort to detect. They can hinder progress toward relational development, especially if the individuals are not open to adjusting their preexisting beliefs.

    10.4.6 Motivation

    Building a relationship takes effort and investments; building across cultural boundaries may take extra motivation and —because intercultural relationships often require more effort to nurture and sustain. We’re not just connecting with another person; we’re also navigating layers of values, beliefs, and behaviors that may need to be explained to ourselves, to each other, and sometimes to our communities. Take Demi, a Chinese-Canadian woman, who shared that in high school, she only wanted to date men who looked like the actor Paul Walker. But as she began dating outside her cultural background, she quickly realized that every difference, food, family expectations, and communication styles, came with questions. Over time, the constant need to explain became emotionally exhausting.

    What does friendship look like in this culture? What are the expectations in a romantic relationship? Who needs to approve the relationship? Why would we want to be friends? What taboos might we be crossing? And how do we handle the potential questioning, or even pushback, from our own cultural group? These are not easy questions, and the process of answering them takes time, patience, and emotional energy. For some, this extra layer of effort can feel overwhelming. For others, it becomes a meaningful part of the journey.

    10.4.7 Language and Nonverbal Barriers and Communication Breakdowns

    One of the most immediate and tangible challenges in intercultural relationships is navigating language barriers and the communication breakdowns that can result. As seen in the opening example with Luis and Yi-Joon, even with good intentions, differences in language, slang, and nonverbal cues can lead to misunderstandings. Luis was puzzled by Yi-Joon's avoidance of eye contact during serious talks, while Yi-Joon felt overwhelmed by Luis's directness. These seemingly small differences can accumulate, creating friction and frustration if not addressed with patience and a willingness to understand.

    Beyond literal language differences, communication styles themselves vary greatly across cultures. Some cultures favor high-context communication, where much of the meaning is embedded in the context, nonverbal cues, and shared understanding, rather than explicit verbal statements. Other cultures prefer low-context communication, where messages are direct, explicit, and rely heavily on words. When individuals from these differing communication styles interact, misinterpretations are common. What one person perceives as direct and clear, another might see as blunt or even rude. Conversely, what one person considers subtle and polite, another might find vague or evasive. Overcoming these barriers often involves active listening, asking clarifying questions, and a mutual commitment to finding common ground in how messages are sent and received.

    10.4.8 Identity Negotiation: The Ultimate Challenge and Reward

    Intercultural relationships inherently involve a process of identity negotiation, where individuals from different cultural backgrounds work to understand, affirm, and integrate their diverse identities within the context of their relationship. This concept is central to Ting-Toomey's Identity Negotiation Theory (Ting-Toomey, 1999; Ting-Toomey & Chung, 2012), which emphasizes that people strive for a sense of secure, distinctive, and authentic identity in their interactions. In intercultural relationships, this negotiation is particularly complex as partners navigate not only their personal identities but also their cultural identities. It's the most profound challenge of these relationships, because it is constant.

    This process often involves a degree of cultural compromise, where partners adapt their behaviors, beliefs, and values to accommodate each other. This isn't about one person abandoning their culture, but rather finding ways to integrate and respect both cultural frameworks. For example, Natalie and Daniel, in deciding how to raise their children, had to negotiate their Baptist and Jewish traditions. This required open dialogue and a willingness to find a shared path that honored both their individual and cultural identities, rather than defaulting to one over the other.

    When friends, family, and co-workers engage in this negotiation with respect and genuine curiosity, the relationship can become a rich tapestry woven from diverse cultural threads, leading to a stronger, more resilient bond. It's a journey of continuous learning, where both individuals grow in their understanding of themselves and each other, ultimately creating a unique shared identity that celebrates their cultural complexities.

    It’s not impossible for an intercultural relationship to work out. What's critical is to affirm the other person’s cultural identity. We need to recognize that the other person might have different values, beliefs, and behaviors which form both their individual and cultural identities. This requires being open-minded, being interested, being respectful, realizing the similarities, avoiding making assumptions, and celebrating the differences. Intercultural relationships have real challenges, but if things work out, they can be amazing.

    Contributors and Attributions

    Communication in the Real World: An Introduction to Communication Studies, by No Attribution- Anonymous by request. Provided by LibreTexts. License: CC-BY-NC-SA

    Intercultural Communication for the Community College, by Karen Krumrey-Fulks. Provided by LibreTexts. License: CC-BY-NC-SA

    Exploring Intercultural Communication, by Tom Grothke. Provided by LibreTexts. License: CC-BY-NC-SA


    10.4: When Things Get Tricky- Challenges of Intercultural Love and Friendship is shared under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Angela Hoppe-Nagao & Kim Yee, Cerritos College..