8.5: Peer Marriage
- Page ID
- 305805
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\dsum}{\displaystyle\sum\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dint}{\displaystyle\int\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dlim}{\displaystyle\lim\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)
\( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)
\( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)Peer Marriage
In contemporary society, many couples strive for what sociologists call a peer marriage, sometimes referred to as an egalitarian marriage. In this model, partners share power, responsibilities, and decision-making more equally, rather than following traditional gendered divisions of labor. Both spouses often participate in earning income, managing household tasks, and parenting duties. Communication and negotiation are central, and both partners’ goals, values, and careers are considered when making life decisions.
Research shows that peer marriages are linked to higher marital satisfaction, particularly when both partners feel their contributions are recognized and valued. Egalitarian arrangements can reduce stress related to work-family balance, support individual autonomy, and promote a sense of teamwork. However, achieving true equality requires ongoing negotiation, flexibility, and attention to cultural, social, and structural factors that may reinforce traditional roles (Killewald & Gough, 2013; Cherlin, 2020).
Peer marriages are not without challenges. Even in committed egalitarian unions, societal norms, workplace expectations, and ingrained habits can create subtle inequalities. Couples who actively communicate, establish clear expectations, and share both visible and invisible work—such as emotional labor—tend to experience the most success in these arrangements.
Chapter Conclusion
Marriage in the United States is diverse, evolving, and shaped by social, cultural, economic, and legal forces. From historical forms like institutionalized and companionate marriage to contemporary expressions such as peer marriage and covenant arrangements, the meaning of marriage has shifted alongside societal change.
While marriage offers numerous benefits—including economic stability, health advantages, and social support—it does not benefit all individuals equally. Access to the marriage premium is influenced by race, gender, socioeconomic status, and education. Understanding these disparities can help inform social policy, relationship education, and personal decision-making.
As readers reflect on the role of marriage in their own lives and in society, it is important to recognize that marriage is only one pathway to building families and meaningful intimate relationships. Whether through cohabitation, peer partnerships, or other arrangements, the core principles of commitment, communication, and mutual support remain essential for long-term relationship success.
In summary, marriage is both a personal choice and a social institution. Its forms, functions, and benefits are continually negotiated, reflecting broader societal trends and individual values. By studying marriage from historical, sociological, and economic perspectives, we gain insight into both the opportunities and challenges that shape modern intimate relationships.
Key Takeaways
-
Marriage is a social and legal institution that has evolved over time. It includes various forms such as monogamy, polygamy, and peer marriage, each reflecting cultural and historical contexts.
-
Marriage trends in the U.S. show declining overall marriage rates, rising cohabitation, and more flexible gender roles within partnerships.
-
Sociological perspectives (functionalism, conflict theory, symbolic interactionism, feminist theory, and others) help us understand the roles, meanings, and inequalities in marriage.
-
Marriage benefits include economic stability, health advantages, and social support. However, these benefits are not equally distributed and often favor those with higher socioeconomic status, education, and privilege.
-
Covenant and peer marriages emphasize commitment, shared responsibility, and equality in roles, highlighting the importance of negotiation and communication for marital satisfaction.
-
Marriage is one pathway to family and intimacy, but individuals and society continue to recognize diverse forms of committed relationships beyond traditional marriage.
References
Ahituv, A., & Lerman, R. I. (2007). How do marital status, work effort, and wage rates interact? Demography, 44(3), 623–647. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2007.0022
Budig, M. J., & England, P. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review, 66(2), 204–225. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657415
Cherlin, A. J. (2020). Marriage, divorce, remarriage (3rd ed.). Harvard University Press.
Killewald, A., & Gough, M. (2013). Does specialization explain marriage penalties and premiums? American Sociological Review, 78(3), 477–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122413484151
Lehrer, E. L. (2016). Religion, economics, and demography: The effects of religion on education, work, and the family. Routledge.
Lerman, R. I. (2002). Marriage and the economic well-being of families with children. Urban Institute. https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/60516/410541-Marriage-and-the-Economic-Well-Being-of-Families-with-Children.PDF
Musick, K., & Bumpass, L. (2012). Reexamining the case for marriage: Union formation and changes in well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00873.x
Umberson, D., & Montez, J. K. (2010). Social relationships and health: A flashpoint for health policy. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(S), S54–S66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510383501
Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. Doubleday.
Watson, T., & McLanahan, S. (2001). Inequality and marriage. American Economic Review, 91(2), 256–261. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.2.256
Wood, R. G., Avellar, S., & Goesling, B. (2007). The effects of marriage on health: A synthesis of recent research evidence. Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org