2.2: The Constitution's 14th Amendment - Classroom Activity
- Page ID
- 231651
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\dsum}{\displaystyle\sum\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dint}{\displaystyle\int\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dlim}{\displaystyle\lim\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)
\( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)
\( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\(\newcommand{\longvect}{\overrightarrow}\)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\(\newcommand{\ket}[1]{\left| #1 \right>}\)
\(\newcommand{\bra}[1]{\left< #1 \right|}\)
\(\newcommand{\braket}[2]{\left< #1 \vphantom{#2} \right| \left. #2 \vphantom{#1} \right>}\)
\(\newcommand{\braopket}[3]{\left< #1 \vphantom{#2}\vphantom{#3} \right| #2 \vphantom{#1}\vphantom{#3} \left| #3 \vphantom{#1}\vphantom{#2} \right>}\)
\(\newcommand{\qmvec}[1]{\mathbf{\vec{#1}}}\)
\(\newcommand{\op}[1]{\hat{\mathbf{#1}}}\)
\(\newcommand{\expect}[1]{\langle #1 \rangle}\)
\(\newcommand{\dfn}[1]{\emph{\textbf{#1}}}\)
Constitutional Discussion: The Impact of the 14th Amendment
Let's learn more about how the 14th Amendment has been used in major Supreme Court decisions and modern-day problems by dividing up the task.
1. Preparation
The class divides into four groups:
Group 1 defends the historical value and founding purpose of the 14th Amendment.
Group 2 presents arguments about the application of the 14th Amendment in racial equality cases including Brown v. Board of Education.
Group 3 examines how the amendment applies to gender equality and LGBTQ+ rights.
Group 4 investigates the voting rights and modern immigration policies that the amendment supports.
Each group researches its assigned topic, creates arguments for it, and prepares an opening statement.
2. Debate
-Each group presents their opening statement and key arguments.
-Other groups ask follow-up questions.
3. Class Reflection
The main points from the presentations are discussed by the class. What was learned? Which group’s interpretation of the 14th Amendment was most convincing? Why?
Evaluation Rubric
| Criteria | Exemplary (4 pts) | Proficient (3 pts) | Developing (2 pts) | Beginning (1 pt) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Historical Accuracy & Research | Arguments are well-researched, historically accurate, and reference key cases, amendments, or primary sources. | Generally accurate with minor omissions or vague references. | Some factual errors or missing important historical context. | 严重 factual errors or no evidence of research. | /4 |
| 2. Alignment with Assigned Topic | Group stays tightly focused on its specific topic (e.g., Group 1 on founding purpose; Group 4 on voting rights/immigration). | Mostly on topic but occasional digressions. | Often strays from assigned focus. | Ignored assigned topic entirely. | /4 |
| 3. Quality of Arguments | Arguments are logical, well-structured, and supported by specific Supreme Court cases (e.g., Brown, Obergefell, Shelby County). | Arguments present but some lack case support or depth. | Weak or unsupported arguments. | Arguments missing or irrelevant. | /4 |
| 4. Opening Statement | Clear, persuasive, and concise; introduces key arguments and sets up group’s stance effectively. | Clear but less compelling or slightly disorganized. | Unclear or overly long/short. | No coherent opening. | /4 |
| 5. Use of Landmark Cases | Integrates at least 2–3 relevant cases naturally into arguments (e.g., Group 2: Brown v. Board; Group 3: Obergefell v. Hodges; Group 4: Reynolds v. Sims). | Mentions cases but without deep analysis. | Cases mentioned but irrelevant or misused. | No case references. | /4 |
| 6. Responses to Follow‑up Questions | Answers questions directly, thoughtfully, and with evidence; maintains respectful tone. | Answers most questions adequately but some evasion. | Struggles to answer; vague or incorrect responses. | Cannot respond meaningfully; hostile or silent. | /4 |
| 7. Group Collaboration | All members participate in research, presentation, and Q&A. | Most members participate. | Only 1–2 members contribute. | No teamwork evident. | /4 |
| 8. Connection to Modern Issues | Clearly links 14th Amendment to contemporary problems (modern immigration policies, voting rights debates, LGBTQ+ rights, etc.). | Some modern connections but underdeveloped. | Minimal or very general modern references. | No modern application. | /4 |