4.15: Assignments
- Page ID
- 307739
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\dsum}{\displaystyle\sum\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dint}{\displaystyle\int\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dlim}{\displaystyle\lim\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)
\( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)
\( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\(\newcommand{\longvect}{\overrightarrow}\)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\(\newcommand{\ket}[1]{\left| #1 \right>}\)
\(\newcommand{\bra}[1]{\left< #1 \right|}\)
\(\newcommand{\braket}[2]{\left< #1 \vphantom{#2} \right| \left. #2 \vphantom{#1} \right>}\)
\(\newcommand{\braopket}[3]{\left< #1 \vphantom{#2}\vphantom{#3} \right| #2 \vphantom{#1}\vphantom{#3} \left| #3 \vphantom{#1}\vphantom{#2} \right>}\)
\(\newcommand{\qmvec}[1]{\mathbf{\vec{#1}}}\)
\(\newcommand{\op}[1]{\hat{\mathbf{#1}}}\)
\(\newcommand{\expect}[1]{\langle #1 \rangle}\)
\(\newcommand{\dfn}[1]{\emph{\textbf{#1}}}\)
Assignment 1: Democracy Stress Test (Comparative Analysis Project)
- Objective:
- Evaluate the health of democracy in a selected country using theoretical frameworks from the chapter.
- Task:
- Choose one country and conduct a “democratic stress test” analyzing:
- Institutional integrity (elections, judiciary, media)
- Inclusion and participation
- Presence of backsliding indicators
- Role of technology in political processes
- Choose one country and conduct a “democratic stress test” analyzing:
- Frameworks to Apply:
- Dahl’s polyarchy
- Democratic backsliding (Bermeo, Levitsky & Ziblatt)
- Intersectionality (Crenshaw)
- Deliverable Options (student choice):
- Policy brief (1,500–2,000 words)
- Interactive slide deck
- Recorded 8-minute analysis
Assignment 2: Peace and Justice Mapping Lab
- Objective:
- Analyze how peace, justice, and democracy interact in a real-world conflict.
- Task:
- Select a conflict-affected region and map:
- Forms of violence (direct vs structural, Galtung)
- Peace building efforts
- Justice mechanisms (formal and informal)
- Democratic participation pathways
- Select a conflict-affected region and map:
- Creative Component
- Students must include a visual system map showing relationships between peace, justice, and governance.
- Deliverable:
- Analytical report (1,200–1,800 words) + visual map
Assignment 3: Algorithmic Democracy Audit (AI & Ethics Applied Project)
- Objective:
- Critically evaluate how a specific technology shapes democratic processes.
- Task
- Choose one:
- Social media platform
- AI system (e.g., predictive policing, hiring algorithms)
- Digital governance tool (e-voting, civic platforms)
- Choose one:
- Analyze:
- Bias and inequality
- Impact on participation and deliberation
- Risks (disinformation, surveillance)
- Policy or design solutions
- Frameworks:
- Surveillance capitalism (Zuboff)
- Algorithmic bias (Noble, Eubanks)
- Democratic theory (Habermas, participatory models)
- Deliverable Options:
- Policy memo
- Tech ethics report
- “Audit dossier” (structured evaluation)
Assignment 4: Constitutional Imagination Project (Signature Assignment)
- Objective:
- Synthesize democracy, peace, and justice into a normative vision.
- Task:
- Write a preamble for a hypothetical “Global Constitution” that:
- Defines democracy beyond elections
- Embeds justice (social, economic, environmental)
- Addresses global inequality and digital governance
- Reflects intersectional inclusion
- Write a preamble for a hypothetical “Global Constitution” that:
- Extension Option: Add 3–5 guiding principles or articles.
- Deliverable:
- 800–1,200 word preamble and reflection
Assignment 5: Case Study Remix (Narrative + Analysis Hybrid)
- Objective:
- Deepen understanding of real-world democratic dynamics.
- Task:
- Select one case from Section 4.9 and:
- Expand it with additional research
- Reanalyze it through two theoretical frameworks
- Propose an alternative outcome or policy intervention
- Select one case from Section 4.9 and:
- Deliverable:
- Choose one
- Analytical essay (1,500 words) OR
- Narrative-policy hybrid piece
- Choose one
Bonus
- Peace-Process Mapping: Select a conflict region and trace peace building initiatives through Galtung’s positive/negative peace framework.
- Digital Ethics Audit: Evaluate one technology’s democratic impact (e.g., AI policing, blockchain voting). Propose safeguards grounded in human-rights standards.
- Constitutional Imagination Project: Draft a one-page preamble for a hypothetical “Global Constitution” integrating democracy, peace, and justice principles.
- Film or Literature Analysis: Analyze a cultural work that portrays democracy or authoritarianism. Discuss how art shapes civic empathy.
- Policy Brief: Recommend one reform to democratize a global institution (UN, IMF, WTO, ICC) and justify it with comparative evidence.


