Skip to main content
Social Sci LibreTexts

5: Music and Movement, Gathering and Singing

  • Page ID
    274095
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\dsum}{\displaystyle\sum\limits} \)

    \( \newcommand{\dint}{\displaystyle\int\limits} \)

    \( \newcommand{\dlim}{\displaystyle\lim\limits} \)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    ( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \(\newcommand{\longvect}{\overrightarrow}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)

    One morning, while I was observing in an early childhood classroom, something seemed a bit off. Two co-teachers had gathered a group of children for circle time, but when it came time to sing, one of the teachers hesitated. Her voice was low and soft, and the joyful energy that singing can bring never quite emerged.   At the same time, her co-teacher sat corralling the children, imploring them to pay attention and sing along.  This is not altogether uncommon in the world of ECE. In my work, I have witnessed teachers avoid music and movement experiences with children altogether or defer to a video recording of some "kids" YouTube celebrity, highly produced, splashed with bright primary colors, and filled with directive movements shouted into the microphone by an overly chipper young songstress or a trendy "kiddy" pop group that would probably sell out the multipurpose room if they ever came to town. Incidentally, for a deeper dive into the developmental issues posed by both large and small screens in ECE, see the note at the end of this chapter.

    It was not hard for me to understand what the hesitancy was all about. In my early years of working with children, I also felt nervous about circle time. The idea of engaging musically with a lively group of young children, who often act impulsively and with unpredictable energy, struck fear in my heart. Might I lose control? How will I manage all of these little people? Frankly, it was more than my ECE training had prepared me for. Add to this my reserved temperament, along with a slight embarrassment at acting “silly” in front of any nearby adults, and you have the ingredients for avoidance. It can seem much more civilized to have children sitting on their carpet squares, raising their hands to speak, and moving through the familiar routines of counting the days on the calendar and noting the day's weather, albeit in a way that is much less engaging and creatively robust.

    What I once avoided for fear of losing classroom control, I now see as my misunderstanding of the shared rhythm between teacher and child that can emerge in a group.  In circle time, I learned that a child's energy is something to be understood and moved with, not something to be managed away.  I learned that children can and do help guide the direction of circle time.  We teachers gently restore balance whenever it is needed.

    Example \(\PageIndex{1}\)

    It was the fourth rainy day in a week, and the stress of being cooped up inside for most of it was getting on the nerves of more than a few children and adults in the room. Although teachers in this particular classroom were highly skilled at ensuring there were just the right number of choices in various areas of the room for exploration and play (Science Discoveries, Literature Provocations, Dramatic Play settings, Sensory and Art materials, etc.), the space was becoming, as their director David said, “emotionally itchy.” Lucy, a co-teacher in the classroom with 24 four-year-old children, was overwhelmed by children whose budding coping skills were wearing down and whose whining skills were ramping up in equal measure. Lucy decided she needed to pull out some of the stops and invite the children into a refreshing creative movement experience.

    Lucy: (loudly, yet with an expression that signals fun, interrupting a couple of squabbling children each tugging on a coveted chef’s hat in the play restaurant) I see that you both want that hat! That’s a problem! How can we solve that?

    Two children: (talking over one another) I had it first! He took it from me! No! You stole it from me! (An errant hand swipes at the hat, ripping it dramatically.)

    circle time.jpgLucy: (Lucy's expression communicates concern and curiosity while maintaining calm engagement.)  Oh… something… is… not… working.  We cannot hurt others or the things in our school. I am going to help you. Let’s put this chef’s hat in the workshop so it can be repaired after naptime. Then I am going to bring my magic singing hat so we can do some dancing and singing together.

    As Lucy begins a playful, child-directed song, it ripples through the room, drawing a few more children in its wake. A small group gathers, becoming movers and groovers in the shared rhythm, while others remain deeply absorbed in their own explorations, the room holding both movement and quiet focus at once. 

    This vignette highlights a teaching style that will be discussed in greater detail later in this book. It is not a style I recommend for children's day-to-day classroom experience. When children have access to a thoughtfully prepared environment with developmentally appropriate materials across curriculum areas, they are primarily engaged in child-initiated learning. The style illustrated here is used selectively, in moments when the group's emotional climate requires a shift. Lucy temporarily moves into a more directive role, not to suppress children’s energy, but to redirect it and reestablish shared rhythm through movement and music.

    The Why and What of Circle Time

    Circle time is a daily gathering routine commonly used in early childhood classrooms. It is a time when children and teachers come together as a group, typically sitting in a circle, to greet one another, sing songs, read stories, discuss the day’s events, and build a sense of community. The practice supports both social-emotional development and early academic learning by helping children feel seen, heard, and part of something larger than themselves.

    Despite the hesitation I described earlier, there is a reason circle time remains such a central practice in early childhood education. The “why” is rooted in the understanding that young children learn best through connection, repetition, and routine. Learning, as Lev Vygotsky (1978) reminds us, is inherently social. Activities like circle time allow children to practice language, self-regulation, and turn-taking within a meaningful shared context. Through songs, stories, and group conversations, children expand their vocabularies, strengthen listening skills, and learn how to express ideas in a group setting.

    Jean Piaget’s work (1964) on cognitive development also helps illuminate its value. As children move from egocentric thinking toward greater awareness of others, circle time offers daily opportunities for perspective-taking and empathy. Singing together, noticing who is absent, or hearing a peer’s story helps children begin to understand that others have thoughts, feelings, and experiences different from their own.

    Howard Gardner’s theory (2011) of multiple intelligences further expands this view, reminding us that children enter the group with many ways of learning. A well-designed circle time can offer varied modes of engagement: songs and rhythms for musical learners, storytelling for verbal learners, movement-based greetings for kinesthetic learners, and shared discussion for interpersonal learners.

    Circle time is about more than just teaching teacher-directed content.  It...

    • develops a shared rhythm among children and their caring adults
    • builds social connections and fosters a sense of community among adults and children.
    • fosters whole child development (socially, emotionally, cognitively, physically, and linguistically).
    • becomes a predictable routine that fosters trust in the environment when approached with warmth, structure, and intention.

    Cultural considerations

    Circle time is an important part of the daily experience in ECE. It is an opportunity to build a sense of community, share ideas, and introduce concepts through songs, stories, and movement. However, it is essential to recognize that circle time is not a “one-size-fits-all” experience. Children come to the classroom with diverse cultural backgrounds that influence how they engage in group settings, respond to authority, and participate in expressive activities.

    Some children may quietly observe before joining in, while others may come from families where group participation is more animated and collaborative. As Loris Malaguzzi (2012) reminded us, children have “a hundred languages” for expressing themselves, not all of which may emerge during traditional group routines. Thoughtful teachers consider these nuances by offering multiple ways for children to participate during circle time, such as movement, visual expression, or small-group sharing. As early childhood specialist Louise Derman-Sparks (2010) emphasizes, culturally responsive teaching encourages educators to acknowledge each child’s background while promoting a sense of belonging. Circle time, when approached with flexibility and cultural sensitivity, becomes a meaningful practice of inclusion and respect that honors diversity.

     

    Singing: from direct instruction to wild abandon

    When I began working with children in the early ’80s, I was struck by how my mentors encouraged a joyful freedom in their students during circle time.  The teachers whom I looked up to took singing and movement seriously, and by that I mean they saw children’s connection to song as imperative to their later conceptual and intellectual development (not to mention the emotional and physical benefits that were also the outcome). 

    One of my mentors, Maggie, took me aside one day after I expressed a disdain for the part of my job that required getting children to sit down for any amount of time. Since it was my turn to do circle time that day, I had asked if we could skip it. Maggie denied my request and informed me that she wanted me to learn how to do circle time with children that would allow for their “wild abandon.” I was intrigued, but still nervous.

    She explained that I needed to meet the children at their level of energy and that the group would have a collective energy I would need to learn how to read. If they were “rascally,” I was to match that energy and be ready with songs, movement, and a book that would fit the moment. If they were irritable, especially just before lunch or naptime, I was to draw on my “soft” songs and a more soothing voice. It was not always easy for me to read this collective energy, but eventually I learned. I have since come to believe that circle time is not only something to prepare for in advance, but also something to approach as an art. No one could tell me exactly how to do this part of my job, but I could develop my skills and work with children at their level of need. This shift removed much of the hesitancy I once felt about circle time.  It took me a while to embrace Maggie’s ideas around “wild abandon,” but I have since come to define it for myself. By “wild abandon,” I mean the way a bird sings without worrying who is listening, or how a child spins in circles for the giggle it produces. It is freedom with intention, not chaos. To me, wild abandon is something deeply valuable. It is the kind of open, natural movement that helps children learn about themselves and the world through music and motion.

    Creative Movement: Expanding the Language of the Body

    One of the most helpful ways I have come to understand movement in early childhood is through the work of Susan Griss (1998), who describes creative movement as a language of learning. In her view, movement is not simply physical activity added to the day, but a symbolic system through which children construct and communicate meaning. Much like spoken or written language, movement carries intention, interpretation, and expression. Children are not just moving their bodies; they are using movement to think. Griss emphasizes an important distinction between imitative movement and creative movement. In imitative forms, children follow a model and reproduce prescribed actions. In creative movement, children are invited to generate their own responses. This shift matters because it moves the child from repetition into interpretation. Instead of simply complying with a sequence of actions, children begin to make decisions, experiment with possibilities, and represent ideas through their bodies in personal ways.

    What stands out to me in this framework is how closely it aligns with symbolic development. In the Piagetian sense, children are not only learning how to move, they are learning how to represent. A gesture can become a character, a shape can become an emotion, and a sequence of movement can become a story. In this way, movement becomes a bridge between lived experience and abstract thought. Griss also reframes the role of the teacher. Rather than directing every movement or correcting toward uniformity, the teacher becomes a facilitator of possibility. The teacher offers prompts, themes, or starting points, and then steps back enough to allow children to explore their own interpretations. This requires a different kind of attentiveness, one that is less about control and more about noticing how meaning unfolds in real time.

    Over time, I have come to see how this approach connects directly to what I once experienced as uncertainty or fear in circle time. What I interpreted as the possibility of losing control was often a moment where children were entering their own symbolic systems, moving beyond imitation into invention. Griss’s work helped me recognize that these moments are not disruptions to learning, but expressions of it.


    Structured Songs and Shared Movement: A Balanced View

    Within early childhood classrooms, there is also a long-standing place for structured songs and coordinated movement activities, such as “Hokey Pokey” and similar group routines. These experiences offer children valuable opportunities for group participation, memory, sequencing, and social synchronization. They can create a strong sense of belonging, particularly when children are learning to participate in a group for the first time.

    From a developmental perspective, these kinds of activities support important skills such as listening, following multi-step directions, and moving in coordination with others. They also provide predictable frameworks that many young children find comforting and engaging.

    At the same time, when viewed through the lens of creative movement theory, structured songs tend to emphasize imitation and uniform response. The movement is typically predetermined, and the range of expression is intentionally limited so that the group can move together in a shared pattern. This does not diminish their value, but it does place them in a different category of learning than open-ended creative movement.

    Susan Griss’s (1998) framework helps clarify this distinction. In creative movement, children are not primarily practicing a correct sequence of actions. Instead, they are constructing meaning through individual interpretation and embodied symbolism. When both approaches are present in the classroom, they can serve different purposes: one supporting cohesion and shared rhythm, the other supporting imagination, agency, and symbolic expression.

    In this way, the question is not whether structured songs or creative movement should exist in early childhood settings, but how they are balanced. A rich music and movement curriculum makes space for both collective experience and individual invention, allowing children to move between shared rhythm and personal expression as part of their daily learning.

    Guided Imagery & Creative Visualization

    One of the most powerful aspects of music and movement in early childhood is its ability to generate imagery. A simple song or prompt can become an entire internal world for a child. A story about a ball bouncing can shift into a shared experience of rhythm, space, and embodiment. Children naturally translate language into movement and movement into meaning, often without needing explicit explanation. In my own practice, I have found guided creative imagery to be a particularly effective way of supporting this process. In these experiences, I might invite children to imagine themselves playing with a ball, noticing how it moves, how it feels, and how it travels through space. Over time, the experience can shift so that the children imagine themselves becoming the ball, moving with its qualities and exploring what it might feel like to roll, bounce, or pause.

    Guided creative imagery in early childhood classrooms draws on contemporary understandings of embodied learning and cognitive development. Elliot Eisner emphasizes that children make meaning through multiple forms of representation, not only language but also image, movement, and sensory experience. From this perspective, when children are invited to imagine a ball and then imagine themselves becoming the ball, they are engaging in a form of representational thinking that extends beyond verbal explanation and into embodied meaning-making.

    children in guided visualization.jpgThis kind of guided imagery also connects to current understandings of how children regulate attention, emotion, and physical readiness for learning. Daniel Siegel’s work highlights the importance of integration between mind and body, suggesting that learning is supported when children are able to organize their internal states in ways that allow for focus and engagement. In classroom terms, movement and imagery activities can help children settle their bodies while also activating their attention in a purposeful way.

    Jean Ayres’ sensory integration theory further supports the role of movement in learning by describing how sensory input from the body helps children organize their responses to the environment. When children move, imagine, and shift roles within a guided experience, they are not only engaging in play, but also developing the capacity to coordinate perception, action, and attention in meaningful ways.

    Within this framework, the use of creative imagery serves a dual purpose. It supports children in developing symbolic representation through imaginative transformation, and it also supports their ability to regulate their bodies and attention so they can participate more fully in group learning experiences. In this way, imagery is not an add-on activity, but a core practice that connects cognition, movement, and engagement.

    In this way, imagery is not an add-on activity but a core practice that connects cognition, movement, and engagement.

    What becomes especially interesting is how quickly this inner world of imagery wants to move outward again. Children rarely keep their imagination still for long. Once a story or image takes hold in the mind, it often seeks expression through the body. A bouncing ball is no longer only something to picture, it becomes something to enact. An internally imagined transformation naturally invites movement, gesture, and shared physical experience.

    This is where creative movement becomes an extension of creative imagery rather than a separate practice. The imagined world begins to take shape in space, and the child’s body becomes the medium through which meaning is explored, tested, and expanded. In these moments, movement is not simply following instruction, but responding to an internal idea that is seeking expression.

    Over time, I have come to see that transitioning from control to movement also reshapes the teacher’s role. Rather than guiding children toward rigid behavioral patterns, the focus shifts to supporting their expressive development. What I initially experienced as unpredictability (and yes, sometimes chaos) now appears as creative intelligence in action.  Perhaps the most important lesson I have learned is to trust children's capacity for imagination and expression. Music and movement flourish when we make room for both.

    Note

    Digital Screens in Early Childhood Classrooms: Context, Not Hub

    In transitional kindergarten and preschool classrooms across California, large digital screens are increasingly part of the daily environment. Their presence is most visible during whole-group instruction and morning routines.


    See this! A Morning Group Routine Around the Big Screen

    In a transitional kindergarten classroom, children gather on the rug facing a large wall-mounted screen as part of the morning routine. A streamed video introduces a literacy concept through animated characters and rapid visual pacing. The teacher intermittently pauses to ask recall questions, though most interaction remains oriented toward the screen rather than between children. During the viewing period, children’s participation is primarily visual andridgid receptive, with limited movement, dialogue, or peer exchange, with some children appearing uncertain about the appropriate focus of attention between the teacher and the characters on screen. When the video concludes, the class transitions to related table activities, though the shift from shared viewing to individual work produces uneven continuity in engagement and understanding.

    The following discussion is grounded in classroom observations from preschool and TK settings in California and is offered as a contextual interpretation rather than a universal description of early childhood classrooms.


    Presence in Practice

    Large digital screens are increasingly visible in early childhood and transitional kindergarten classrooms. In many settings, they are used to stream video content intended to support instruction, engagement, or classroom routines. Their pedagogical significance is not determined by their presence, but by the role they play in shaping attention, interaction, and participation.

    Within early childhood education, learning is consistently understood as a process grounded in active engagement with materials, sustained social interaction, embodied sensory exploration, and teacher-mediated dialogue. Across the work of Lillian Katz (1993) and David Elkind (1981) as well as the position statements of the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC, 2020), learning is not viewed as the passive reception of information but as participation in meaning-making, in which children come to understand the world through movement, interaction, and shared negotiation with others in real time. 

    From this perspective, classroom materials and media are never neutral. They help organize the conditions under which participation becomes possible. When large screens become a dominant instructional mode, they may concentrate attention toward a shared visual field, reduce opportunities for sustained peer interaction, narrow space for spontaneous dialogue, and displace hands-on exploratory activity. The concern is not the presence of digital tools in itself, but the way in which they may reorganize the structure of participation in the classroom, subtly shifting it from reciprocal engagement toward sustained visual consumption. 

    The American Academy of Pediatrics offers a complementary framing in its guidance on children’s digital media environments, emphasizing that developmental outcomes are shaped not simply by exposure, but by the quality of content, the context of use, and whether media supports or replaces relational and active experiences. This perspective reinforces the importance of examining how digital tools function within the broader ecology of classroom life, rather than treating them as inherently beneficial or harmful. 

    At the same time, digital screens may support learning when they are embedded within teacher-led dialogue, shared documentation of children’s work, collaborative reflection, or intentional revisiting of classroom experiences. In these instances, the screen operates as one element within a relational and interactive learning environment rather than as the primary source of instruction. Its pedagogical limitations become most visible when it functions primarily as a continuous stream of externally produced content for group viewing, with limited interruption, dialogue, or co-construction of meaning. 

    Professional Orientation

    For teachers, this distinction is vital. You may enter classrooms where digital screens are already established features of the learning environment. Your charge is not to reject these contexts, but to interpret them: to notice when tools displace relational pedagogy and when they can support it.

    In practice, this means paying attention to what children are doing with one another, not only what they are looking at. You begin to ask, "Who is doing the talking?"  "Who is doing the thinking?"  "Where is meaning being constructed in this moment?"

    And perhaps most importantly, you learn to see that the presence of a screen does not determine the quality of learning. It's the structure of relationships in the room that does! 

    Reflecting Thoughts

    The most important lesson I've learned about music and movement is that teaching young children isn't always about leading them into our rhythm and ways. Sometimes, it means listening carefully enough to identify the rhythm and ways that already exist within them. Children may be restless, exuberant, quiet, curious, or anywhere in between. Our task is to observe, respond, and foster an environment where their energy can be expressed, connected, and meaningful. I once thought that a successful circle time depended on keeping children focused and still. Now, I realize that a successful gathering can take many forms. It might be children singing together, a single child moving while others watch, or a spontaneous burst of laughter that shifts the group’s energy. The teacher's role isn’t to suppress these differences but to understand what they reveal. By making space for music, movement, imagery, and creative expression, we encourage children to communicate through many languages. We also become more responsive teachers, willing to loosen our control and trust in children's bodies, minds, and imaginations. Ultimately, the key question isn’t whether children participate as we expect, but whether we have created a space where their participation is meaningful to them. 

     


    This page titled 5: Music and Movement, Gathering and Singing was last modified on Mon, 27 Jul 2026 03:06:56 GMT and is shared under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Donna King.

    • Was this article helpful?