6.5: Chapter 6 Summary

Interpersonal Communication Review

What is Interpersonal Communication?

• The process of exchanging messages between people whose lives mutually influence one another, shaped by social and cultural norms.
• Not every exchange counts: brief, impersonal talk with a stranger usually isn’t “interpersonal” unless there’s meaningful, ongoing influence.

Why It Matters

• Survival and health: Social bonding aided human evolution; strong interpersonal skills correlate with better mental/physical health and less isolation.
• School, work, life: Employers prize communication; competent communicators balance being effective (achieving goals) and appropriate (respecting people/context).

How Interpersonal Communication Functions

• Instrumental goals: Getting things done (requesting help/info, offering support).
• Relational-maintenance goals: Keeping relationships strong (celebrations, regular check-ins, “define-the-relationship” talks).
• Self-presentation goals: Managing how others see us by adapting to roles and contexts.

Culture and Relationship “Micro‑Cultures”

• Relationship cultures: Each relationship develops its own climate, routines, and rules, influenced by larger cultural norms.
• How we build them:
  • Storytelling: Old stories test fit; new shared stories build solidarity.
  • Personal idioms: Inside jokes/nicknames that signal belonging.
  • Routines and rituals: Predictable practices (weekly calls, dinner traditions) that create comfort and meaning.
  • Rules and norms: Explicit rules (we consult before big decisions) and implicit norms (no “shop talk” at happy hour).

Communicating in Relationships

• Self-disclosure: Sharing personal info others wouldn’t know unless you tell them; increases in breadth and depth as trust grows; works best with reciprocity.
• Johari Window:
  • Arena (known to self/others), Blind spot (others know, you don’t), Façade (you know, others don’t), Unknown (no one knows yet).
• Relational dialectics (tensions we balance):
  • Autonomy–Connection, Novelty–Predictability, Openness–Closedness.
  • Management strategies: Neutralization (compromise), Separation (alternate), Segmentation (divide life spheres), Reframing (see tensions as supportive, not opposing).

Communication Climates

• Confirming climates make people feel valued; disconfirming climates do the opposite.
• Three confirming message types:
  • Recognition (you exist to me),
  • Acknowledgement (I hear your thoughts/feelings),
  • Endorsement (your feelings are valid, even if I disagree).

Conflict and Interpersonal Communication

• Definition: Interaction with perceived incompatible goals, scarce resources, or opposing viewpoints. Conflict is inevitable—and can be productive if well managed.
• Five conflict styles:
  • Competing (win/lose), Avoiding (delay/withdraw), Accommodating (yield), Compromising (each gives up something), Collaborating (win/win).
• Culture and face:
  • Individualist cultures often favor competing; collectivist cultures more often avoid or collaborate to protect harmony/“other-face.”

Handling Conflict Better

• Common triggers: Criticism, demands, cumulative annoyance, rejection.
• Patterns to watch: Serial arguing (repeating, mutual hostility), pitfalls like one‑upping and mindreading.
• Helpful moves: Validate, ask questions, listen actively, separate people from the problem, look for shared interests.

Basic Negotiation Steps

1. Prenegotiation: Signal a time to talk; clarify your goals (instrumental/relational/self‑presentation).
2. Opening: Set a cooperative tone; use “we” language.
3. Exploration: Share perspectives; gather info.
4. Bargaining: Propose options; stay flexible; aim to collaborate.
5. Settlement: Summarize agreements; confirm next steps; follow up.

Dark Side of Interpersonal Communication

• Lying: Important to understand the types of lies we tell and the motivations for and consequences of lying.
• Sexual and Emotional Cheating: Increase in technology and personal media makes extradyadic relationships easier to conceal.
• Communication Aggression: Recurring verbal or nonverbal communication that significantly and negatively affects a person's sense of self. 

Quick Self-Check

• Which goal are you prioritizing (instrumental, relational, self-presentation) in your next tough conversation?
• What’s one confirming message (recognize, acknowledge, endorse) you can send today?
• Which conflict style do you default to—and when would collaborating serve you better?
• Do you experience or practice communication that would be considered on the dark side of the communication continuum? 

References

Ball State University, “Roommate Conflicts,” accessed June 16, 2001, cms.bsu.edu/CampusLife/Counse.ateIssues.aspx.Bell, R. A. and J. G. Healey, “Idiomatic Communication and Interpersonal Solidarity in Friends’ Relational Cultures,” Human Communication Research 18 (1992): 307–35.

Benigno, A., “Jersey Shore Glossary: This Dictionary of Terms Will Get You (Fist) Pumped for Season Two,” N.Y. Daily News, July 28, 2010, articles.nydailynews.com/2010.st-pump-snooki.

Bobot, L., “Conflict Management in Buyer-Seller Relationships,” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 27, no. 3 (2010): 296.

Bruess, C. J. S. and Judy C. Pearson, “Interpersonal Rituals in Marriage and Adult Friendship,” Communication Monographs 64, no. 1 (1997): 35.

Burleson, B. R., Sandra Metts, and Michael W. Kirch, “Communication in Close Relationships,” in Close Relationships: A Sourcebook, eds. Clyde Hendrick and Susan S. Hendrick (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2000), 247.

Cai, D. A. and Edward L. Fink, “Conflict Style Differences between Individualists and Collectivists,” Communication Monographs 69, no. 1 (2002): 67–87.

Canary, D. J. and Susan J. Messman, “Relationship Conflict,” in Close Relationships: A Sourcebook, eds. Clyde Hendrick and Susan S. Hendrick (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2000), 261–70.

Candland, D. K., Feral Children and Clever Animals: Reflections on Human Nature (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995).

Christensen, A. and Neil S. Jacobson, Reconcilable Differences (New York: Guilford Press, 2000), 17–20.

Comadena, M. E., “Accuracy in Detecting Deception: Intimate and Friendship Relationships,” in Communication Yearbook 6, ed. M. Burgoon (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1982), 446–72.

Dailey, R. M., Carmen M. Lee, and Brian H. Spitzberg, “Communicative Aggression: Toward a More Interactional View of Psychological Abuse,” in The Dark Side of Interpersonal Communication, eds. Brian H. Spitzberg and William R. Cupach (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007), 298.

Dindia, K. and Leslie A. Baxter, “Strategies for Maintaining and Repairing Marital Relationships,” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 4, no. 2 (1987): 143–58.

Dsilva, M. U. and Lisa O. Whyte, “Cultural Differences in Conflict Styles: Vietnamese Refugees and Established Residents,” Howard Journal of Communication 9 (1998): 59.

Eckstein, N., “Adolescent-to-Parent Abuse: Exploring the Communicative Patterns Leading to Verbal, Physical, and Emotional Abuse,” in The Dark Side of Interpersonal Communication, eds. Brian H. Spitzberg and William R. Cupach (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007), 366.

Fisher, W. R., “Narration as Human Communication Paradigm: The Case of Public Moral Argument,” Communication Monographs 51, no. 1 (1985): 1–22.

Gates, S., “Time to Take Negotiation Seriously,” Industrial and Commercial Training 38 (2006): 238–41.

Gottman, J. M., What Predicts Divorce?: The Relationship between Marital Processes and Marital Outcomes (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1994). 

Goffman, E., The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (New York: Anchor Books, 1959).

Hargie, O., Skilled Interpersonal Interaction: Research, Theory, and Practice (London: Routledge, 2011), 2.

Isenhart, M. W. and Michael Spangle, Collaborative Approaches to Resolving Conflict (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2000), 26.

Johnson, K. L. and Michael E. Roloff, “Correlates of the Perceived Resolvability and Relational Consequences of Serial Arguing in Dating Relationships: Argumentative Features and the Use of Coping Strategies,” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 17, no. 4–5 (2000): 677–78.

Johnson, M. P., “Violence and Abuse in Personal Relationships: Conflict, Terror, and Resistance in Intimate Partnerships,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships, eds. Anita L. Vangelisti and Daniel Perlman (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 557.

Jones Jr., R. G., “Drag Queens, Drama Queens, and Friends: Drama and Performance as a Solidarity Building Function in a Gay Male Friendship Circle,” Kaleidoscope: A Graduate Journal of Qualitative Communication Research 6, no. 1 (2007): 61–84.

Knapp, M. L., “Lying and Deception in Close Relationships,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships, eds. Anita L. Vangelisti and Daniel Perlman (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 519.

Leary, M. R., “Toward a Conceptualization of Interpersonal Rejection,” in Interpersonal Rejection, ed. Mark R. Leary (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001), 3–20.

Macintosh, G. and Charles Stevens, “Personality, Motives, and Conflict Strategies in Everyday Service Encounters,” International Journal of Conflict Management 19, no. 2 (2008): 115.

Markman, H. J., Mari Jo Renick, Frank J. Floyd, Scott M. Stanley, and Mari Clements, “Preventing Marital Distress through Communication and Conflict Management Training: A 4- and 5-Year Follow-Up,” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 61, no. 1 (1993): 70–77.

Messman, S. J. and Rebecca L. Mikesell, “Competition and Interpersonal Conflict in Dating Relationships,” Communication Reports 13, no. 1 (2000): 32.

Morgan, W. and Steven R. Wilson, “Explaining Child Abuse as a Lack of Safe Ground,” in The Dark Side of Interpersonal Communication, eds. Brian H. Spitzberg and William R. Cupach (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007), 327.

National Association of Colleges and Employers, Job Outlook 2011 (2010): 25.

Occupational Safety and Health and Safety Administration, “Workplace Violence,” accessed September 13, 2011, http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/workplaceviolence

Oetzel, J., Adolfo J. Garcia, and Stella Ting-Toomey, “An Analysis of the Relationships among Face Concerns and Facework Behaviors in Perceived Conflict Situations: A Four-Culture Investigation,” International Journal of Conflict Management 19, no. 4 (2008): 382–403.

Reese-Weber, M. and Suzanne Bartle-Haring, “Conflict Resolution Styles in Family Subsystems and Adolescent Romantic Relationships,” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 27, no. 6 (1998): 735–52.

Shalev, S., “Solitary Confinement and Supermax Prisons: A Human Rights and Ethical Analysis,” Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice 11, no. 2 (2011): 151.

Sillars, A. L., “Attributions and Communication in Roommate Conflicts,” Communication Monographs 47, no. 3 (1980): 180–200.

Spitzberg, B. H. & Cupach, W. R. “Disentangling the Dark Side of Interpersonal Communication,” in The Dark Side of Interpersonal Communication, eds. Brian H. Spitzberg and William R. Cupach (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007), 5.

Tafoya, M. A. and Brian H. Spitzberg, “The Dark Side of Infidelity: Its Nature, Prevalence, and Communicative Functions,” in The Dark Side of Interpersonal Communication, eds. Brian H. Spitzberg and William R. Cupach (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007), 207.

Williams, K. D. and Lisa Zadro, “Ostracism: On Being Ignored, Excluded, and Rejected,” in Interpersonal Rejection, ed. Mark R. Leary (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001), 21–54.