6.16: Assignment- Moral Reasoning Interview
- Page ID
- 60479
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)
Criteria | Proficient | Developing | Not Evident | Points |
---|---|---|---|---|
Writes a coherent reflection between 300-500 words | Writes in clear, descriptive sentences with no or few grammatical errors. The paper is well organized and complete. | Does not provide enough detail in the paper or contains several grammatical errors. | Incomplete paper or difficult to understand. | __/4 |
Demonstrates having completed both interviews | Successfully reports on the responses from the interviews in sufficient detail | Demonstrates having completed the interviews but does not include much detail or analysis | Does not successfully demonstrate having completed the interviews or the analysis | __/10 |
Explains the connection with Kohlberg’s theory | Analyzes the interviews in the context of Kohlberg’s stages and identifies where each participant likely falls according to the stages. | Analyzes the interviews in the context of Kohlberg’s stages but with limited description or development. | Does not thoroughly address the interviews in the context of Kohlberg’s stages of moral reasoning | __/6 |
Total: | __/20 |
Contributors and Attributions
CC licensed content, Original