Skip to main content
Social Sci LibreTexts

9.3: Fact-Checking and Source Evaluation Strategies

  • Page ID
    260920
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\dsum}{\displaystyle\sum\limits} \)

    \( \newcommand{\dint}{\displaystyle\int\limits} \)

    \( \newcommand{\dlim}{\displaystyle\lim\limits} \)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    ( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)

    Evaluating Sources for Research Projects

    In Chapter 3, we examined the lateral reading (SIFT) approach that professional fact checkers use to help them evaluate a source by examining what other sources can tell them about it. This might including finding out more about the source's publisher through Wikipedia, or check the truth of a claim using an internet fact checking site like Snopes.

    Once we have fact-checked a source, we can use vertical reading (PICK) to examine it more closely to determine its useful to our research.

    SIFT & PICK Fact Checking & Source Evaluation

    What Makes an Information Source "Good?"

    “Good” sources include those that provide complete, current, factual information, and/or credible arguments based on the information creator’s original research, expertise, and/or use of other reliable sources.

    Whether a source is a good choice for you depends on your information needs and how you plan to use the source.

    Evaluating Sources Using Lateral & Vertical Reading

    The SIFT* & PICK approach to evaluating sources helps you select quality sources by practicing:

    yellow arrow pointing to the right Lateral Reading (SIFT): fact-checking by examining other sources and internet fact-checking tools; and

    green arrow pointing down Vertical Reading (PICK): examining the source itself to decide whether it is the best choice for your needs.

    *The SIFT method was created by Mike Caulfield under a CC BY 4.0 International License.

    The word SIFT

    Stop

    • Check your emotions before engaging
    • Do you know and trust the author, publisher, publication, or website?
      • If not, use the following fact-checking strategies before reading, sharing, or using the source in your research

    Investigate the source

    • Don’t focus on the source itself for now
    • Instead, read laterally
      • Learn about the source’s author, publisher, publication, website, etc. from other sources, such as Wikipedia

    Find better coverage

    • Focus on the information rather than getting attached to a particular source
    • If you can’t determine whether a source is reliable, trade up for a higher quality source
    • Professional fact checkers build a list of sources they know they can trust

    Trace claims to the original context

    • Identify whether the source is original or re-reporting
    • Consider what context might be missing in re-reporting
    • Go “upstream” to the original source
      • Was the version you saw accurate and complete?

    The word PICK

    Purpose / Genre / Type

    • Determine the type of source (book, article, website, social media post, etc.)
      • Why and how it was created? How it was reviewed before publication?
    • Determine the genre of the source (factual reporting, opinion, ad, satire, etc.)
    • Consider whether the type and genre are appropriate for your information needs

    Information Relevance / Usefulness

    • Consider how well the content of the source addresses your specific information needs
      • Is it directly related to your topic?
      • How does it help you explore a research interest or develop an argument?

    Creation Date

    • Determine when the source was first published or posted
      • Is the information in the source (including cited references) up-to-date?
    • Consider whether newer sources are available that would add important information

    Knowledge-Building

    • Consider how this source relates to the body of knowledge on the topic
      • Does it echo other experts’ contributions? Does it challenge them in important ways?
      • Does this source contribute something new to the conversation?
    • Consider what voices or perspectives are missing or excluded from the conversation
      • Does this source represent an important missing voice or perspective on the topic?
      • Are other sources available that better include those voices or perspectives?
    • How does this source help you to build and share your own knowledge?

    Journalistic Standards

    We examined journalistic standards in Chapter 3. Below is a reminder of the V.I.A. acronym.

    The text "VIAbility of News" with a venn diagram showing circles for verification, independence, and accountability intersecting, and the overlap labeled "reliable news"

    The Center for News Literacy at Stony Brook University uses the acronym V.I.A. to describe the characteristics shared by trustworthy media outlets.

    VIAbility of News Sources

    A media outlet that adheres to journalistic standards is committed to the following practices:

    Verification

    • Uses evidence from multiple credible sources to demonstrate the accuracy or truth of claims

    Independence

    • Remains free from outside control or influence
    • Makes conscious effort to set aside preexisting beliefs
    • Uses checks and balances to ensure independence

    Accountability

    • Takes responsibility for work
    • Acknowledges mistakes and makes corrections

    Sources

    SIFT & PICK by Ellen Carey is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


    9.3: Fact-Checking and Source Evaluation Strategies is shared under a CC BY-NC-SA license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Ellen Carey.

    • Was this article helpful?