Skip to main content
Social Sci LibreTexts

7.6: Research Proposals

  • Page ID
    241453

    \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\dsum}{\displaystyle\sum\limits} \)

    \( \newcommand{\dint}{\displaystyle\int\limits} \)

    \( \newcommand{\dlim}{\displaystyle\lim\limits} \)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    ( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)
    Learning Objectives
    1. Identify how a research proposal differs from a research report.
    2. Describe how sections of a research proposal differ from similar sections of a research manuscript.

    A research proposal is often submitted to a course professor or a research advisor as the last step before you start actually collecting data. The proposal shows that you've read previous research, that the previous research or a theory has led you to identify needed information or clarification, a description of how you think it would be best to collect and analyze the data that you collect, and a conclusion about the impact and application of your expected findings. This is packaged in the same format as a manuscript or APA Style research report:

    • Title page
    • Abstract
    • Main body, which includes:
      • Introduction
      • Methods, which includes sub-sections:
        • Participants
        • Materials
        • Design
        • Procedure
      • Results
      • Discussion/Conclusion
    • Reference page
    • Appendices (optional)

    In addition to those sections, research proposals frequently include a research timeline. We discuss each of these eight sections as well as producing a research timeline below.

    These sections are generally formatted the same, other than the verb tense. In manuscripts, everything is written in past tense. Others have already conducted their research (in your literature review), and you have already collected and analyzed your data. In research proposals, the literature review is still in past tense (other have already completed their research), but your Method, Result, and Conclusion sections are in future tense because you have not collected or analyzed your data yet.

    Introduction Section

    Just like a research report, the research proposal should begin with a hook to entice your readers. This can be done in many ways, just remember that the key objective is to convince your reader that the issue is problematic and is worth investigating. After the problem and rationale are introduced, the next step is to frame the problem within the academic discourse through summarizing others' prior research. Again, this is the same as in any other type of research report. By foregrounding the previous findings, you will then set the stage for your own methodology. Part of outlining the scholarly discussion should also focus on clarifying the boundaries of your topic. While making the significance concrete, try to hone in on select variables that your research should include.

    Tips for A Research Proposal's Literature Review

    • Summarize: The literature in your literature review is not going to be exhaustive but it should demonstrate that you have a good grasp on key debates and trends in the field
    • Quality not quantity: Despite the fact that this is non-exhaustive, there is no magic number of sources that you need. Do not think in terms of how many sources are sufficient. Think about presenting a decent representation of key themes in the literature.
    • Highlight theory and methodology of your sources (if they are significant). Doing so could help justify your theoretical and methodological decisions, whether you are departing from previous approaches or whether you are adopting them.
    • Synthesize your results. Do not simply state “According to Robinson (2021)….According to Wilson (2021)… etc”. Instead, find common grounds between sources and summarize the point e.g., “Researchers argue that we should not list our literature (Bartolic, 2021; Robinson, 2020; Wilson 2021).
    • Justify methodological choice
    • Assess and Evaluate: After assessing the literature in your field, you should be able to answer the following questions: Why should we study (further) this research topic/problem?
    • Contribution: At the end of the literature, you should be able to determine contributions will my study make to the existing literature?

    As you briefly discuss the key literature concerning your topic of interest, it is important that you allude to gaps. Gaps are ambiguities, faults, and missing aspects of previous studies. Think about questions that you have which are not answered by existing literature. Specifically, think about how the literature might insufficiently address the following, and locate your research as filling those gaps (UNE, 2021):

    • Population or sample: size, type, location, demography etc. [Are there specific populations that are understudied e.g., Indigenous people, transgender youth, the elderly, etc.]
    • Research methods: qualitative, quantitative, or mixed [Has the research in the area been limited to just a few methods e.g., all surveys? How is yours different?]
    • Variables or conditions [Are you examining a new or different set of variables than those previously studied? Are the conditions under which your study is being conducted unique e.g., under pandemic conditions]
    • Theory [Are you employing a theory in a new way?]

    Identifying a Gap

    To indicate the usefulness and originality of your research, you should be conscious of how your research is both unique from previous studies in the field and how its findings will be useful. When you write your research report, you will expound on these gaps some more. However, in the body of your proposal, it is important that you explicitly highlight the insufficiency of existing literature (i.e. gaps). Below are some phrases that you can use to indicate gaps:

    • …has not been clarified, studied, reported, or elucidated
    • further research is required or needed
    • …is not well reported
    • key question(s) remains unanswered
    • it is important to address …
    • …poorly understood or known
    • Few studies have (UNE, 2021)

    The gaps and literature you outline should set the context for your research questions, and lead to your research hypothesis. After indicating what your research intends to study, formulate this gap into a research hypothesis which make investigating the gap tangible.

    Method Section

    The Method section of a research proposal is the place in which you explain, in specific details, how you plan to collect data to test your research hypothesis. By the time you begin explaining your methodology to test your research hypothesis, you would have already introduced your topic and its significance, and have provided a brief account of its scholarly history (literature review) and the gaps you will be filling. The methods section allows you to discuss how you intend to fulfill said gap. This section is in future tense ("Data will be collected..."), but the sub-sections of the Method section are still relevant. You would propose who your target sample could be, and how many participants you would like to collect data from. You would detail the materials that you plan to use, including the specific questions or prompts or other measures. You would name the type of design that your study will be, and describe the procedure (as you expect the participants to experience it). Your descriptions must be specific enough so that other researchers can repeat them. It is important in this section that you also justify why you believe this specific methodology is the most effective for answering the research question. This does not need to be extensive, but you should at least briefly note why you think, for instance, qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods (and your specific proposed approach) are appropriate for answering your research question.

    Results Section

    The Results section maybe the most different in a research proposal compared to a research report. You haven't collected data yet, so how can you have results? Instead of analyzing your data and interpreting your results, this section in a research proposals discusses how the data will be analyzed. For quantitative research, this should include the specific statistical analyses that are most appropriate based on the IV and DV you explained in the Method section. You would refer back to your research hypothesis, and may include the operational definitions of your IV and DV so that it is clear that the statistical analyses that you are proposing fit with the data that you will have. For qualitative research, this section could describe the qualitative analysis approach that you plan to take. This section also does not have to be extensive. Examples of analysis methods for both types of research are show in Table \(\PageIndex{1}\). This demonstrates that you have given thought to what you intend to do with the data once you have collected it.

    Table \(\PageIndex{1}\)- Example Analysis Methods
    Qualitative Analysis Methods Quantitative Analysis Methods
    Qualitative Content Analysis
    Discourse Analysis
    Thematic Analysis
    Grounded Theory (Inductive)
    Narrative Analysis
    Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis
    Descriptive Statistics
    Mean, median, standard deviation, skewness
    Inferential Statistics
    T-tests, ANOVA, Correlation, regression, chi-square
    Table \(\PageIndex{1}\): Example Analysis Methods. (CC-BY-NC-SA; Robinson & Wilson via 2.4: The Body of the Research Proposal)

    This demonstrates that you have given thought to what you intend to do with the data once you have collected it.

    Conclusion Section

    After you have outlined the literature, the gaps in the literature, how you intend to investigate that gap, and how you intend to analyze what you have found, it is important to again reiterate the significance of your study. You still do not have data, but you can still summarize what you've read and what you expect to find, note any limitations of your proposed study, and discuss implications of the expected findings. Allude to what your study could find and what this would mean. This requires returning to the significant territory that began your proposal and linking it to how your study could help to explain/change this understanding or circumstance. Report on the possible beneficial outcomes of your study. For instance, say you study the impact of welfare checks on homelessness. Then you could respond to the following question: How could my findings improve our responses to homelessness? How could it make welfare policies more effective? Remember you must explain the usefulness or benefits of the study to both the outside world and the research community.

    In addition to noting your strengths, also reflect on the weaknesses. All research has limitations but you need to demonstrate that you have taken steps to mitigate those that can be mitigated and that the research is valuable despite the weaknesses. Be straightforward about the things your study will not be able to find, and the potential obstacles that will be presented to you in conducting your study (in research that is conducted with a population, be sure to note harms/benefits that might come to them). It is tempting to ask why you would propose a study with limitations. The answer is that the real world is messy, and sometimes you can't get the information that you want from the people you want it from. Sometimes, you cannot randomly assign people into the groups that you want to investigate. Sometimes the most scientifically effective study is unethical. It is important for your professor or advisor to be aware of your understanding the practical and ethical barriers to conducting research on your topic. Try to address these obstacles to the best of your ability while continuing to argue for the value of your study despite inevitable tradeoffs. However, do not finish with a long list of inadequacies. End with a crescendo –with the impression that despite the trials and limitations of research, you are prepared for the challenge and the challenge is well worth overcoming. This means reiterating the significance, potential uses, and implications of the findings.


    References

    UNE (2021). Gaps in the literature. UNE Library services. https://library.une.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Gaps-in-the-Literature.pdf


    This page titled 7.6: Research Proposals is shared under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Oral Robinson and Alexander Wilson via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the LibreTexts platform.