Skip to main content
Social Sci LibreTexts

2.0: Prelude to Choice in a World of Scarcity

  • Page ID
    4050
  • Skills to Develop

    • How Individuals Make Choices Based on Their Budget Constraint
    • The Production Possibilities Frontier and Social Choices
    • Confronting Objections to the Economic Approach

    Choices and Tradeoffs

    fig 2.0.1.png 

    Figure \(\PageIndex{1}\): In general, the higher the degree, the higher the salary. So why aren’t more people pursuing higher degrees? The short answer: choices and tradeoffs. (Credit: modification of work by “Jim, the Photographer”/Flickr Creative Commons)

    Choices ... To What Degree?

    In 2015, the median income for workers who hold master's degrees varies from males to females. The average of the two is \(\$2,951\) weekly. Multiply this average by \(52\) weeks, and you get an average salary of \(\$153,452\). Compare that to the median weekly earnings for a full-time worker over \(25\) with no higher than a bachelor’s degree: \(\$1,224\) weekly and \(\$63,648\) a year. What about those with no higher than a high school diploma in 2015? They earn just \(\$664\) weekly and \(\$34,528\) over \(12\) months. In other words, says the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), earning a bachelor’s degree boosted salaries \(54\%\) over what you would have earned if you had stopped your education after high school. A master’s degree yields a salary almost double that of a high school diploma.

    Given these statistics, we might expect a lot of people to choose to go to college and at least earn a bachelor’s degree. Assuming that people want to improve their material well-being, it seems like they would make those choices that give them the greatest opportunity to consume goods and services. As it turns out, the analysis is not nearly as simple as this. In fact, in 2014, the BLS reported that while almost \(88\%\) of the population in the United States had a high school diploma, only \(33.6\%\) of \(25-65\) year olds had bachelor’s degrees, and only \(7.4\%\) of \(25-65\) year olds in 2014 had earned a master’s.

    This brings us to the subject of this chapter: why people make the choices they make and how economists go about explaining those choices.

    You will learn quickly when you examine the relationship between economics and scarcity that choices involve tradeoffs. Every choice has a cost.

    In 1968, the Rolling Stones recorded “You Can’t Always Get What You Want.” Economists chuckled, because they had been singing a similar tune for decades. English economist Lionel Robbins (1898–1984), in his Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science in 1932, described not always getting what you want in this way:

    The time at our disposal is limited. There are only twenty-four hours in the day. We have to choose between the different uses to which they may be put. ... Everywhere we turn, if we choose one thing we must relinquish others which, in different circumstances, we would wish not to have relinquished. Scarcity of means to satisfy given ends is an almost ubiquitous condition of human nature.

    Because people live in a world of scarcity, they cannot have all the time, money, possessions, and experiences they wish. Neither can society.

    This chapter will continue our discussion of scarcity and the economic way of thinking by first introducing three critical concepts: opportunity cost, marginal decision making, and diminishing returns. Later, it will consider whether the economic way of thinking accurately describes either how choices are made or how they should be made.

    Contributor