7.1: The Histories and Theories of Human Movement
- Page ID
- 292411
This page is a draft and is under active development.
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\dsum}{\displaystyle\sum\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dint}{\displaystyle\int\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dlim}{\displaystyle\lim\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)
\( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)
\( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\(\newcommand{\longvect}{\overrightarrow}\)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)-
Trace the historical evolution of human migration from pre-industrial to globalized eras.
-
Explain key theoretical frameworks—push-pull, world-systems, network, and transnational theories.
-
Identify economic, political, and cultural drivers of global mobility.
-
Recognize how inequality and technology shape patterns of movement.
-
Analyze how migration connects with globalization, labor markets, and education
Migration as a Human Constant
Human mobility is as old as humanity itself. The first migrations out of Africa more than 60 000 years ago were driven by survival, climate, and curiosity (Stringer, 2016).
From nomadic pastoralism to the settlement of river valleys, movement defined civilization.
Historian Patrick Manning (2013) calls migration “the central thread in the human story,” reminding us that every city, language, and cuisine is the result of journeys taken.
Even before the term “globalization,” the world was already networked by migration—through caravans, ships, and kinship chains.
Historical Foundations of Global Migration
The Age of Empires
Between the 15th and 19th centuries, imperial expansion forged the first truly global labor markets. European colonization redistributed populations on an unprecedented scale:
-
The trans-Atlantic slave trade trafficked more than 12 million Africans to the Americas (Eltis & Richardson, 2010).
-
Indentured labor from India and China followed in the 19th century, populating plantations in the Caribbean, Mauritius, and Southeast Asia.
-
Settler colonialism moved millions of Europeans to the Americas and Oceania, entrenching racial hierarchies that persist today (Wimmer, 2018).
These early systems fused mobility with coercion and migration as a mechanism of empire and capitalism.
Industrialization and Urban Migration
The 19th century’s Industrial Revolution triggered mass rural-to-urban migration.
Factories in Manchester, Chicago, and Osaka pulled peasants into wage labor, while transoceanic steamships enabled millions to cross borders.
Between 1820 and 1920, over 55 million Europeans migrated to the Americas (Hatton & Williamson, 1998).
Cities swelled, reshaping class structures and public health.
At the same time, colonial subjects moved within empires: Algerians to France, Indians to East Africa, Filipinos to the U.S. —forming early diasporas that blurred the line between empire and nation.
Post-World War II and the Rise of Managed Migration
After 1945, decolonization and reconstruction transformed global mobility again.
Western Europe imported “guest workers” from Turkey, North Africa, and Southern Europe to rebuild its economies (Castles et al., 2014).
In Asia, newly independent states sought labor abroad creating migration corridors from the Philippines to the Gulf, Indonesia to Malaysia, and Pakistan to the U.K.
Simultaneously, international organizations emerged:
-
The International Labour Organization (ILO) began regulating migrant workers’ rights.
-
The International Organization for Migration (IOM) (1951) coordinated refugee resettlement during the Cold War.
-
The 1951 UN Refugee Convention defined who counts as a refugee, though millions displaced by poverty or climate change remain excluded.
The Globalization of Mobility
Neoliberalism and the Marketization of Movement
From the 1980s onward, globalization accelerated capital flows but restricted labor flows. Corporations and commodities moved freely; people, less so. This paradox: free trade vs. closed borders produced a vast informal labor market sustained by precarious migrants (Sassen, 2014).
Remittances now exceed foreign aid: in 2022, migrant workers sent home over $860 billion USD, according to the World Bank (2023).
Entire economies, from Nepal to El Salvador, depend on this transnational income stream.
Technological Acceleration
Cheap air travel, smartphones, and digital money transfer systems have revolutionized migration logistics.
Migrants navigate WhatsApp routes, coordinate remittances through mobile banking, and build online communities bridging continents (Leurs & Smets, 2020). Digital technology collapses distance while amplifying surveillance: biometric visas, predictive-analytics border systems, and data-driven policing redefine who may move and who must stay.
Theories of Migration
Push–Pull Framework
The push–pull model, popularized by Everett Lee (1966), explains migration as the balance of factors driving people away (push) and attracting them (pull):
-
Push: unemployment, conflict, environmental stress.
-
Pull: job opportunities, safety, education.
While intuitive, the model is criticized for ignoring power and structure it treats individuals as free agents rather than actors constrained by borders, class, and race.
World-Systems Theory
Sociologist Immanuel Wallerstein (1974) reframed migration through global capitalism. Core nations (industrialized powers) draw labor from the periphery through colonial and economic dependence. Thus, mobility is not random but patterned by exploitation: the periphery supplies workers; the core extracts value.
Network Theory
Migration also follows social networks—chains of relatives, friends, and intermediaries who reduce risks and costs (Massey et al., 1993). Networks explain why migration persists even after initial economic motives fade: trust and information create self-sustaining routes. For example, Filipino domestic workers in Hong Kong help newcomers find jobs, creating intergenerational diaspora circuits.
Transnationalism
Since the 1990s, scholars highlight transnationalism simultaneous belonging to multiple places (Basch, Glick Schiller, & Szanton Blanc, 1994).
Migrants today maintain dual identities, remitting money while voting or advocating across borders. Social media intensifies this duality, producing “digital diasporas” where emotional, political, and economic life span continents.
Intersectional and Feminist Approaches
Feminist scholars argue migration must be analyzed through gendered and racialized power structures (Parreñas, 2001). Women now comprise nearly half of global migrants, yet their work, especially in domestic and care sectors remains undervalued and invisible (ILO, 2021). Intersectional perspectives reveal that freedom of movement is always uneven—conditioned by passports, race, and class.
The Political Economy of Borders
The Border–Migration Complex
Political theorist Nicholas De Genova (2017) describes the border–migration complex as a system that manages, rather than eliminates, migrant labor. Undocumented status keeps workers exploitable; deportability sustains low wages. Thus, borders do not simply exclude—they produce hierarchies of inclusion.
Global North economies depend on “flexible” labor from the South: farmworkers in California, caregivers in Italy, construction workers in Qatar.
Mobility is stratified—high-skilled professionals enjoy open borders; low-wage migrants face walls and detention centers.
Securitization of Migration
After 9/11, migration governance fused with counterterrorism. The U.S. Patriot Act, EU Frontex, and biometric surveillance systems reframed migration as a security issue (Huysmans, 2006). This securitization normalizes detention camps and militarized borders, often justified as humanitarian control. Yet migrants continue to move, revealing that the desire for dignity and livelihood outpaces restriction.
Culture, Identity, and Global Belonging
Migration reshapes not only economies but also identities. Diasporas create hybrid cultures: reggae in London, Bollywood in Toronto, tacos in Tokyo.
Sociologist Stuart Hall (1990) calls diaspora identity “a production, always in process,” blending nostalgia and innovation. For younger generations, belonging becomes layered—national, local, digital. Citizenship evolves from legal membership to lived participation, echoing Appadurai’s (1996) concept of global ethnoscapes—the fluid landscapes of moving people and images that define modernity.
Migration, Education, and Knowledge Flows (Preview)
Mobility also transforms education. International students, academic exchanges, and digital learning platforms form a “knowledge migration system.”
This will be explored fully later, but for now, note that education has become both a cause and a consequence of mobility. Degrees enable migration; migration, in turn, generates new knowledge economies.