5: Where Arguments conflict
- Page ID
- 353733
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\dsum}{\displaystyle\sum\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dint}{\displaystyle\int\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dlim}{\displaystyle\lim\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)
\( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)
\( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\(\newcommand{\longvect}{\overrightarrow}\)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)- 5.1: Responding to an Argument
- This page highlights the significance of active participation in arguments, explaining that "silence means consent." It uses an example of a partner's accusation to illustrate that without a response, the accused partner is assumed to agree, reinforcing the accuser's claim. The text stresses that genuine discussions require both sides to engage actively; otherwise, misunderstandings arise due to a lack of contestation.
- 5.2: Skepticism
- This page emphasizes the significance of skepticism in evaluating new information, outlining Dan Gilbert's two-step process of acceptance followed by questioning. It differentiates skeptics from cynics, promoting skepticism as a constructive inquiry grounded in evidence. The content also addresses cognitive biases that can impair skepticism, particularly with repeated falsehoods.
- 5.3: Fight or Flight?
- This page discusses the thalamus and amygdala's functions in sensory processing and emotional responses. The thalamus routes sensory signals, while the amygdala initiates the "fight or flight" reaction, often leading to emotional hijacking. It emphasizes the importance of the E + R = O formula to help differentiate between instinctive reactions and deliberate responses, advocating for thoughtful actions in stress for improved results.
- 5.4: Ways to Disagree
- This page outlines Paul Graham's hierarchy of responses to disagreement, detailing seven levels of argumentation from basic name-calling to sophisticated rebuttals. It describes how responses evolve from ignoring the argument and focusing on tone to more reasoned approaches that include counterarguments. The most effective form of disagreement is identified as critically analyzing and explaining flaws in the opposing argument, bolstered by evidence and reasoning.
- 5.5: Two Sides to an Argument
- This page explores argument structure by distinguishing between pro and con positions, defining arguments with clear stances and differentiating them from discussions. It introduces enthymemes, which contain implicit assumptions, and syllogisms that employ deductive reasoning. The Greek view of absolute validity is contrasted with modern critical thinking, which favors probability over certainty, referencing Dr. Toulmin's analytical framework for understanding arguments.
- 5.6: Toulmin Approach to Argument
- In order to determine the most effective strategy to respond to a case, the con-side of an argument needs to analyze the argument to discover the strengths and weaknesses of the pro-side. The Toulmin Model gives us an effective tool to successfully clash with the pro-side.
- 5.7: Counter Argument Strategies
- This page outlines strategies for reinforcing arguments against a claim by incorporating reservations and questioning the definitions and reliability of evidence. It emphasizes the importance of considering exceptions, like economic downturns or health issues, and challenges the warrants of arguments, such as the criteria for success based on monetary milestones and the credibility of specific sources. The overall aim is to strengthen argumentative positions through critical analysis.
- 5.8: No Absolute Certainties
- This page explores argumentation, highlighting the absence of absolute certainty in claims. It presents R. A. Lyttleton's "Bead Model of Truth," which illustrates varying beliefs from disbelief to certainty. Toulmin's model is outlined, examining components like claims, grounds, and warrants that impact argument validity.
- 5.9: Arguing from the Con-Side
- This page presents arguments against eliminating capital punishment in California, emphasizing the advantages of maintaining the current system. It highlights the historical success of capital punishment and the comfort derived from tradition, suggesting that there are insufficient reasons to change the policy. The con-side also notes that this resistance to change can benefit political incumbents.
- 5.10: Using Toulmin To Develop Con Strategies
- This page details two strategies the con-side can use when analyzing arguments with the Toulmin approach. They can either downplay the significance of the issue, favoring the status quo, or challenge the pro-side's proposed solution by questioning its effectiveness and potential complications. By undermining the pro-side's claims, the con-side aims to decrease the argument's acceptance and advocate for its rejection.
- 5.11: Creating A Counter Argument
- This page explores the Toulmin Model for argument analysis and counterargument development. It presents two counterarguments to the claim that all college graduates are successful, focusing on the validity of sources and addressing reservations. The text emphasizes the necessity for robust reasoning in counterarguments and discusses how the con-side can undermine the pro-side's claims by exposing flaws, potentially invalidating the original argument.
- 5.12: Con side Case Alternatives
- This page discusses three debate strategies for the con-side: Straight Refutation, which directly opposes pro claims; Defense of the Status Quo with Minor Repairs, advocating for small adjustments; and Counter Proposal, offering a superior alternative while acknowledging pro goals. It highlights the importance of curiosity and listening in argumentation and prepares for future discussions on the Toulmin Model.
- 5.13: The Focus of This Chapter
- This page highlights the skill of "Clashing" in resolving disagreements, stressing that silence can imply consent. It outlines a range of clashing techniques from name-calling to structured refutation, and promotes the use of the Toulmin Model for analyzing arguments. The text notes that reservations can weaken arguments and introduces three traditional methods of refutation: Straight Refutation, Defense of the Status Quo with Minor Repairs, and Counterproposals.