15.8: Social Classes

How much did European society resemble the sociological description provided by Marx? At first sight, most people were still farmers, every country except Britain was still mostly rural, and the Industrial Revolution took decades to spread beyond its British heartland. That being said, European society was undergoing significant changes, and Marx was right in identifying the new professional middle class, the bourgeoisie, as the agents of much of that change.

"Bourgeoisie" is French for "business class." Originally, the term originally meant, simply, "townspeople." Over time, it acquired the connotation of someone who made money from commerce, banking, or administration but did not have a noble title. By the early 1800s, the bourgeoisie made up between 15% and 20% of the population of central and western Europe. The male members were factory owners, clerks, commercial and state bureaucrats, journalists, doctors, lawyers, and everyone else who fell into that ambiguous class of “businessmen.” They were increasingly proud of their identity as “self-made” men, whose financial success was based on intelligence, education, and competence instead of noble privilege and inheritance. Many regarded the old order as an archaic throwback, limiting their ability to make money and society’s possibilities of further progress. At the same time, they did not work with their hands to make a living; they were neither farmers, artisans, nor industrial workers.

The bourgeoisie was proud of its self-understood sobriety and work ethic, in contrast to the foppery and frivolity of the nobility. Successful middle class members often eagerly bought as much land as they could, both in emulation of the nobles and because the right to vote in most of western Europe was tied to land ownership. In turn, nobles were wary of the middle class, especially because so many bourgeois were attracted to potentially disruptive ideologies like liberalism and nationalism. Over the course of the century, the two classes tended to mix based on wealth. Old families of nobles may have despised the “nouveau riche,” but they still married them if they needed the money.

The bourgeoisie had certain visible things that defined them as a class, literal “status symbols.” They did not perform manual labor and insisted on the highest standards of cleanliness and tidiness in their appearance and homes. All but the most marginal bourgeois families employed at least one full-time servant (recruited from the working class and always paid a pittance) to maintain those standards of hygiene. If possible, bourgeois women did no paid work at all, serving instead as keepers of the home and the maintainers of the rituals of visiting and hosting that maintained their social network. Finally, the bourgeoisie socialized in private places: private clubs, the new department stores that opened in for the first time in the mid-nineteenth century, and the foyers of private homes. The working classes met in taverns (“public houses” or just “pubs” in Britain), while bourgeois men and women stayed safely inside.

Figure 15.9.1: Clothing among the bourgeoisie came to resemble a specific “uniform” of respectability in the nineteenth century - the top hat was an iconic mark of class identity by the middle of the century.

In addition, the members of the bourgeoisie were supposed to live by certain codes of behavior. In contrast to the sexual libertinage of the old nobility, bourgeois men and women were expected to avoid extra-marital affairs. (Although, practically speaking, bourgeois men regularly took advantage of prostitutes). A bourgeois man was to maintain high standards of honesty and business ethics. Popular literature is filled with references to the failure of the bourgeois to live up to these standards and being exposed to vast public humiliation.

What about the nobility? The legal structures that sustained their identity slowly but surely weakened over the course of the nineteenth century. Generational wealth shifted away from land to commerce and industry. Relatively few noblemen had been involved in the early Industrial Revolution, in large part to their traditional disdain for commerce. But, by the middle of the century, it was apparent that industry, banking, and commerce were eclipsing land ownership as the major sources of wealth. At the same time, universal male suffrage was on the horizon (or had already come to pass, as it did in France in 1871) in almost every country in Europe.

Thus, while stubbornly clinging to its titles and its claims to authority, the nobility grudgingly entered into the economic fields of the bourgeoisie and adopted the bourgeoisie’s social habits as well. The lines between the upper echelons of the bourgeoisie and the bulk of the nobility were very blurry by the end of the century, as bourgeois money funded old noble houses that still had access to the social prestige of a title.

Image Citations (Wikimedia Commons):

Heads on Pikes - Public Domain

Highland Soldiers - Public Domain

Marx - Public Domain

Top Hats - Public Domain