Loading [MathJax]/extensions/TeX/mhchem.js
Skip to main content
Library homepage
 

Text Color

Text Size

 

Margin Size

 

Font Type

Enable Dyslexic Font
Social Sci LibreTexts

Search

  • Filter Results
  • Location
  • Classification
    • Article type
    • Author
    • Cover Page
    • License
    • Show TOC
    • Transcluded
    • PrintOptions
    • Number of Print Columns
    • OER program or Publisher
    • Autonumber Section Headings
    • License Version
    • Stage
  • Include attachments
Searching in
About 3 results
  • https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Anthropology/Archaeology/Digging_into_Archaeology%3A_A_Brief_OER_Introduction_to_Archaeology_with_Activities_(Paskey_and_Cisneros)/03%3A_History_(the_1960s_and_beyond)/3.01%3A_Introduction
    The most common optimal behavior models used in archaeology today are diet breadth (also called prey choice), which predicts what humans should have included in their diets in given areas based on how...The most common optimal behavior models used in archaeology today are diet breadth (also called prey choice), which predicts what humans should have included in their diets in given areas based on how long it would have taken to find a food item and prepare it for consumption relative to the food’s caloric return; patch choice, which evaluates how productive a given environment would have been and predicts how long a group would have stayed in one area before moving on; and central place foragi…
  • https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Courses/HACC_Central_Pennsylvania's_Community_College/Archaeology%3A_It's_More_Than_Digging_In_The_Dirt_(Scheib)/03%3A_Contemporary_Archaeology_(1960s_and_Beyond)/3.01%3A_Evolution_of_Archaeology
    Franz Boas and the American archaeologists developed the classificatory-historical paradigm but it had its limitations. In the 1960s, archaeologists began to develop new approaches to address those li...Franz Boas and the American archaeologists developed the classificatory-historical paradigm but it had its limitations. In the 1960s, archaeologists began to develop new approaches to address those limitations.
  • https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Communication/Introduction_to_Communication/Organizational_Communication_-_Theory_Research_and_Practice/04%3A_Modern_Theories_of_Organizational_Communication/4.04%3A_Representative_Modern_Theories
    To speak of “interpretive organizational theory,” or “critical organization theory,” or “postmodern organization theory” is not to speak of any one single theory. Rather, each is—along with the postpo...To speak of “interpretive organizational theory,” or “critical organization theory,” or “postmodern organization theory” is not to speak of any one single theory. Rather, each is—along with the postpositive perspective—a general approach to the looking at the problem of organizational communication. Each approach is informed by its own ontology (belief about the how things exist), epistemology (belief about how things can be known), and axiology (belief about what is worth knowing). Then, out of

Support Center

How can we help?