Skip to main content
Social Sci LibreTexts

12.5: Media Attributions and Notes

  1. Last updated
  2. Save as PDF
  • Page ID
    135627

    • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    ( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    Notes

    1. Unless researchers change the order of questions as part of their methodology and ensuring accurate responses to questions ↵
    2. Not that there are any personal vendettas I'm aware of in academia...everyone gets along great here... ↵
    3. Blackstone, A. (2013). Harassment of older adults in the workplace. In P. Brownell & J. J. Kelly (eds.) Ageism and mistreatment of older workers. Springer ↵
    4. Smith, T. W. (2009). Trends in willingness to vote for a Black and woman for president, 1972–2008. GSS Social Change Report No. 55. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center ↵
    5. Enriquez , L. E., Rosales , W. E., Chavarria, K., Morales Hernandez, M., & Valadez, M. (2021). COVID on Campus: Assessing the Impact of the Pandemic on Undocumented College Students. AERA Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211033576 ↵
    6. Mortimer, J. T. (2003). Working and growing up in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ↵
    7. Lindert, J., Lee, L. O., Weisskopf, M. G., McKee, M., Sehner, S., & Spiro III, A. (2020). Threats to Belonging—Stressful Life Events and Mental Health Symptoms in Aging Men—A Longitudinal Cohort Study. Frontiers in psychiatry, 11, 1148. ↵
    8. Kleschinsky, J. H., Bosworth, L. B., Nelson, S. E., Walsh, E. K., & Shaffer, H. J. (2009). Persistence pays off: follow-up methods for difficult-to-track longitudinal samples. Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 70(5), 751-761. ↵
    9. Silver, N. (2021, March 25). The death of polling is greatly exaggerated. FiveThirtyEight. Retrieved from: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-death-of-polling-is-greatly-exaggerated/ ↵
    10. Babbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research (12th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. ↵
    11. Peterson, R. A. (2000). Constructing effective questionnaires. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. ↵
    12. Babbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research (12th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley; Neuman, W. L. (2003). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson. ↵
    13. Babbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research (12th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. ↵
    14. Hopper, J. (2010). How long should a survey be? Retrieved from http://www.verstaresearch.com/blog/how-long-should-a-survey-be ↵
    15. Sudman, S., Bradburn, N. M., & Schwarz, N. (1996). Thinking about answers: The application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. ↵
    16. Chang, L., & Krosnick, J.A. (2003). Measuring the frequency of regular behaviors: Comparing the ‘typical week’ to the ‘past week’. Sociological Methodology, 33, 55-80. ↵
    17. Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1990). Context effects in attitude surveys: Applying cognitive theory to social research. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 31–50). Chichester, UK: Wiley. ↵
    18. Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Schwarz, N. (1988). Priming and communication: The social determinants of information use in judgments of life satisfaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 429–442. ↵
    19. Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54, 93–105. ↵
    20. Miller, J.M. & Krosnick, J.A. (1998). The impact of candidate name order on election outcomes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62(3), 291-330. ↵
    21. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879. ↵
    22. Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114. ↵
    23. This is why my ratemyprofessor.com score is so low. Or that's what I tell myself. ↵
    24. Whiteford, L. M., & Trotter II, R. T. (2008). Ethics for anthropological research and practice. Waveland Press. ↵
    25. Gordon, E. T. (1991). Anthropology and liberation. In F V Harrison (ed.) Decolonizing anthropology: Moving further toward an anthropology for liberation (pp. 149-167). Arlington, VA: American Anthropological Association. ↵
    26. Kline, M. A., Shamsudheen, R., & Broesch, T. (2018). Variation is the universal: Making cultural evolution work in developmental psychology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1743), 20170059. Stearman, A. M. (1984). The Yuquí connection: Another look at Sirionó deculturation. American Anthropologist, 86(3), 630-650. ↵
    27. Hruschka, D. J., Munira, S., Jesmin, K., Hackman, J., & Tiokhin, L. (2018). Learning from failures of protocol in cross-cultural research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(45), 11428-11434. ↵
    28. Broesch, T., Callaghan, T., Henrich, J., Murphy, C., & Rochat, P. (2011). Cultural variations in children’s mirror self-recognition. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(6), 1018-1029. ↵
    29. Van de Vijver, F. J., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1992). Testing in culturally heterogeneous populations: When are cultural loadings undesirable?. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. ↵
    30. Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O. L., & Lenz, E. R. (Eds.). (2010). Measurement in nursing and health research (4th ed.). Springer. ↵
    31. Meiring, D., Van de Vijver, A. J. R., Rothmann, S., & Barrick, M. R. (2005). Construct, item and method bias of cognitive and personality tests in South Africa. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 31(1), 1-8. ↵
    32. Van de Vijver, F. J., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1992). Testing in culturally heterogeneous populations: When are cultural loadings undesirable?. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. ↵
    33. Barrett, H. C. (2020). Deciding what to observe: Thoughts for a post-WEIRD generation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(5), 445-453. ↵
    34. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Beyond WEIRD: Towards a broad-based behavioral science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 111. ↵
    35. Tucker, B. (2017). From risk and time preferences to cultural models of causality: on the challenges and possibilities of field experiments, with examples from rural Southwestern Madagascar. Impulsivity, 61-114. ↵
    36. Schroeder, D., Chatfield, K., Singh, M., Chennells, R., & Herissone-Kelly, P. (2019). Equitable research partnerships: a global code of conduct to counter ethics dumping. Springer Nature. ↵
    37. Schuller, M. (2010). From activist to applied anthropologist to anthropologist? On the politics of collaboration. Practicing Anthropology, 32(1), 43-47. ↵
    38. First Nations Information Governance Centre. (2014). Ownership, control, access and possession (OCAP): The path to First Nations information governance. ↵
    39. Fischer, R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2018). Addressing methodological challenges in culture-comparative research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(5), 691-712. ↵
    40. Hruschka, D. J. (2020). What we look with” is as important as “What we look at. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(5), 458-459. ↵
    41. Purzycki, B. G., & Lang, M. (2019). Identity fusion, outgroup relations, and sacrifice: a cross-cultural test. Cognition, 186, 1-6. ↵

    This page titled 12.5: Media Attributions and Notes is shared under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Matthew DeCarlo, Cory Cummings, & Kate Agnelli (Open Social Work Education) .