Summary of Section 9.1: Ethics in Political Research
To conduct political research in an ethical way, our practice must follow a number of principles and rules that are established by the community of practitioners. One of the primary reasons for establishing and following such standards is to ensure that our research is not causing any irreparable harm to others as well as to protect the integrity and reputation of the political science discipline. The Institutional Review Board helps ensure that ethical research practices are institutionalized and potential harms to the subjects of a study are reduced by embedding various safeguards into the design of a research project.
Summary of Section 9.2: Ethics and Human “Subjects”
It is important to note that our “subjects” are not only a means of testing theories, illuminating puzzles, and discovering new ones, but are also ends in themselves. As such, it is necessary to be cognizant about the need to balance between one’s role as a researcher, an active participant in the phenomenon under investigation, a friend, and in certain instances, an adversary. When engaging in research involving human subjects, it is essential that the participants are fully informed as they consent to their participation.
Summary of Section 9.3: Navigating Qualitative Data Collection
In the process of qualitative data collection, it is important to ensure the anonymity and confidentiality of the subjects to achieve ethical data collection. A researcher must also consider a reflexive approach to data collection so that one can minimize bias and open ourselves to new ways of thinking.
Summary of Section 9.4: Research Ethics in Quantitative Research
Although all political science share core ethical principles, there are potential differences between qualitative and quantitative approaches to political science, such as their respective approaches to addressing issues associated with objectivity and subjectivity. One key concern for the quantitative researcher are the ethical and analytical benefits associated with facilitating data access, production transparency, and analytical transparency.
Summary of Section 9.5: Ethically Analyzing and Sharing Co-generated Knowledge
Due to the fact that academics possess “epistemic power”, it is essential to be aware that we can never be entirely value-neutral or eliminate our personal biases as we conduct political research. It is ethically important to reflect on how the results of a study may impact those that made the study possible. Also, let us strive to bring something of value back to the community and/or persons that made your study possible.
