9.1: Edit figures -The Power and Paradox of Tourism in the Global Age

Learning Objectives

• Describe the economic, cultural, and environmental significance of global tourism.

• Explain how tourism functions as both a connector and disruptor of cultures.

• Analyze diverse tourism models in five case study countries: Madagascar, Turkmenistan, Nauru, Iceland, and Japan.

• Evaluate the paradoxes of globalization, sustainability, and digital mediation in modern travel.

• Reflect on tourism as a mirror of identity, power, and inequality.

Global Tourism

Tourism is one of humanity’s most pervasive social phenomena. Before the pandemic, the United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO, 2023) estimated 1.5 billion international arrivals annually—proof that leisure travel now rivals migration as a global movement. Yet the same flows that symbolize openness also reproduce inequality. Sociologist Dean MacCannell (1976) argued that tourists seek “authenticity in modernity’s shadow,” consuming cultural difference to escape industrial sameness. In the digital century, that quest is amplified by social-media performance (Urry & Larsen, 2011).Tourism is one of the world’s largest industries, generating over 10% of global GDP and employing one in every ten workers (UNWTO, 2023).

Tourism operates simultaneously as economic engine and cultural mirror. According to the International Labour Organization (ILO, 2022), it accounts for 10 percent of global employment, often in precarious forms. UNESCO (2021) emphasizes that sustainable tourism can advance SDG 8, but only when profits circulate locally and heritage is co-managed with communities. The challenge, as Hall (2022) notes, is to reconcile growth with justice—ensuring that “the right to mobility” does not become the privilege of the affluent.

Beyond economics, it is a mirror of globalization—reflecting how cultures see, desire, and imagine each other.  As anthropologist Dean MacCannell (1976) argued, tourism is a quest for authenticity in a world of mass production. Yet what travelers seek as “authentic” is often staged for them, blurring boundaries between discovery and performance. In the 21st century, the post-pandemic tourism rebound revealed how fragile and essential travel has become: a lifeline for economies and an arena for environmental reckoning. While Paris and Bali overcrowd, places like Turkmenistan and Nauru remain isolated, revealing tourism’s uneven geography.

Tourism reveals the texture of globalization. It connects people and places through aspiration, technology, and inequality. In this Global Issues course, this chapter asks how travel—whether physical or digital—embodies the promises and contradictions of global interdependence. From ancient pilgrimage routes to Instagram geotags, the movement of bodies and images exposes the moral geography of the twenty-first century. Linking with earlier chapters on democracy, environment, and human rights, this section encourages readers to analyze tourism as a system of cultural exchange shaped by SDGs 8 (Decent Work), 10 (Reduced Inequalities), 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), and 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions).  Modern tourism emerged from colonial circuits, steamships, railways, and exotic exhibitions that mapped pleasure onto empire (Bianchi, 2018). Postwar mass tourism democratized mobility but not necessarily respect. The 2020 pandemic exposed the fragility of this model: empty beaches revealed dependence on external demand. UNWTO (2023) calls for “rebuilding tourism for people, planet, and prosperity,” linking climate, labor, and cultural resilience. This chapter explores how those ideals confront reality through the lenses of dark tourism, digital media, and sustainability.

Figure 9.1 – Global Tourism Flow Map.
Illustrates major North-South travel corridors, visualizing the unequal distribution of tourist origins and destinations.

 

 

1. Madagascar: Biodiversity and the Tourism of Fragility

Nature as Currency

Madagascar, known as the “Eighth Continent,” is home to 5% of the world’s biodiversity and over 90% endemic species (Goodman & Benstead, 2005).
Tourism centers on ecotourism—lemur spotting in Andasibe-Mantadia National Park, diving in Nosy Be, and rainforest trekking in Ranomafana.

Yet tourism here is both hope and hazard. The sector provides over 7% of GDP, but mass visitation strains fragile ecosystems. Coral bleaching and deforestation threaten the very landscapes tourists come to admire (Rakotomanana et al., 2020).

Community Ecotourism and Inequality

Local cooperatives, like Anja Community Reserve, pioneered community-managed tourism models that reinvest profits in schools and conservation (Wollenberg et al., 2011).
However, political instability—particularly the 2009 coup—devastated arrivals, showing how tourism depends on peace as much as paradise.
Madagascar illustrates the paradox of eco-capitalism: nature becomes currency in a market that risks destroying it.

---

3. Turkmenistan: Authoritarian Aesthetics and the Illusion of Openness

The Spectacle State

Turkmenistan, one of the world’s most closed nations, uses tourism as performance rather than participation.
Its capital, Ashgabat, dazzles with white marble, golden statues, and empty highways—earning a Guinness record for most marble buildings (BBC, 2022).

Tourism here serves political spectacle. The “Gates of Hell” gas crater, burning continuously since the 1970s, attracts a niche of “extreme” travelers. Yet every visit is monitored; photography and local interaction are restricted.

Controlled Experience

As tourism researcher Catherine Baker (2019) notes, Turkmenistan exemplifies “disciplinary tourism”—a state-curated form of travel that projects modernity while concealing repression.
The regime’s visa requirements and guided tours ensure the visitor’s gaze is choreographed.

Still, the paradox is real: tourists seek authenticity in the world’s least authentic spaces. They experience the illusion of access—glimpses of a closed world curated to appear open.

Turkmenistan’s model reveals how tourism can be weaponized for soft authoritarian power, manufacturing an image of stability to attract investment.

---

4. Nauru: Post-Colonial Isolation and the Tourism of Ruins

From Paradise to Phosphate Desert

Nauru, the world’s third smallest country, was once the richest per capita due to phosphate mining. By the 1990s, the island’s resources were exhausted, leaving ecological devastation—cratered interior, infertile soil, and dependence on aid (Connell, 2006).

Tourism in Nauru is almost nonexistent—around 200 annual visitors, many connected to regional diplomacy or environmental research.
Yet this absence of tourism is itself sociologically revealing. Nauru stands as a negative case study: what happens when a place has been globally consumed before tourism could begin.

Dark Tourism of Desolation

Some scholars describe visits to Nauru as a form of “dark ecological tourism”—witnessing the consequences of extractive capitalism (Lindstrom, 2020).
The island’s transformation from tropical utopia to detention hub for Australia’s offshore asylum program symbolizes postcolonial tragedy.

Environmental NGOs and filmmakers use Nauru as a cautionary site for Anthropocene awareness—a mirror of planetary excess.
As an island whose paradise was mined away, Nauru exposes the moral underside of global mobility.

---

5. Iceland: The Laboratory of Sustainable Tourism

Boom and Backlash

Between 2010 and 2019, Iceland’s tourism grew from 500,000 to over 2.3 million visitors—nearly seven tourists per citizen (Icelandic Tourism Board, 2020).
Cheap flights, volcanic landscapes, and Game of Thrones filming sites turned Iceland into a social media fantasy.

Tourism revived the post-financial-crisis economy but also overwhelmed infrastructure, inflated housing costs, and strained fragile ecosystems.
The overtourism backlash led to new sustainability frameworks: visitor caps, ecotaxes, and the “Inspired by Iceland” campaign promoting responsible travel.

Eco-Branding and Authenticity

Iceland positioned itself as a laboratory for balancing growth with preservation—renewable energy, geothermal spas, and carbon capture tourism experiences.
Yet scholars like Gössling (2021) warn of “greenwashing Iceland”—where ecological rhetoric masks persistent carbon footprints from aviation.

Iceland’s success story illustrates tourism’s paradox: the more authenticity is marketed, the faster it disappears.

---

6. Japan: Heritage, Pop Culture, and Digital Pilgrimage

Cultural Duality

Japan hosts one of the world’s most sophisticated tourism industries, blending ancient heritage and hypermodern spectacle.
Visitors flock to Kyoto’s temples, Tokyo’s neon districts, and anime pilgrimage sites such as Akihabara or the real-world settings of Your Name and Spirited Away (Seaton & Yamamura, 2015).

Tourism contributes nearly 9% of Japan’s GDP (JTA, 2022), with inbound numbers recovering rapidly after the COVID-19 reopening.

Soft Power and Pop Culture Diplomacy

Japan’s “Cool Japan” strategy leverages pop culture for international influence—an example of soft power diplomacy (Nye, 2004).
Themed tourism (Studio Ghibli Park, Pokémon Centers, cosplay events) merges entertainment with identity branding.
Digital pilgrimages—fans visiting anime or game-related locations—exemplify how social media blurs boundaries between fiction and place.

Community Revitalization

Rural revitalization programs (e.g., Satoyama tourism) attract urban youth and foreign volunteers to depopulated villages.
Japan’s success lies in integrating cultural continuity with innovation, transforming nostalgia into sustainability.

---

7. The Paradox of Global Travel

Across these five examples, tourism emerges as a moral paradox:

Country	Tourism Type	Paradox
Madagascar	Ecotourism	Conservation vs. consumption
Turkmenistan	Authoritarian tourism	Control vs. curiosity
Nauru	Dark ecological tourism	Visibility vs. erasure
Iceland	Sustainable tourism	Preservation vs. promotion
Japan	Cultural-pop tourism	Heritage vs. hypermodernity

Each illustrates how globalization produces uneven access to mobility and representation. Some nations invite the world in; others resist or collapse under its gaze.

As sociologist John Urry (2002) described, tourism constructs a “tourist gaze”—a socially organized way of seeing.
Who gets to look, and who becomes the looked-at, remains deeply political.

---

8. Post-Pandemic Tourism and Digital Rebirth

COVID-19 paralyzed tourism worldwide, exposing dependence on mobility and forcing introspection.
In its aftermath, digital and domestic tourism surged: virtual museum tours, augmented reality heritage walks, and influencer-driven microtravel.
Madagascar developed VR biodiversity expeditions; Japan expanded online temple visits; Iceland marketed virtual aurora livestreams.

The crisis accelerated a shift toward meaningful travel—longer stays, ethical itineraries, and regenerative tourism models aligned with SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth) and SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production).

---

9. Conclusion – The Global Stage of Leisure and Loss

Tourism is not merely leisure—it is a mirror of the global condition.
In Madagascar’s forests, Turkmenistan’s marble streets, Nauru’s mined wasteland, Iceland’s volcanic plains, and Japan’s neon skylines, we see variations of the same drama: how humans seek meaning through movement while consuming the very world they long to preserve.

The future of tourism depends on reconciling pleasure with responsibility, mobility with humility, and connection with conservation.
As travel writer Pico Iyer (2019) wrote, “The more we travel, the more we are reminded that every place is both foreign and home.”

---

Key Terms

• Tourist Gaze – The socially constructed way travelers view destinations.

• Ecotourism – Environmentally responsible travel promoting conser