Skip to main content
Social Sci LibreTexts

7.4.1: The Range of Interest Groups in Sacramento

  • Page ID
    179279

    \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    ( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    Contemporary Groups

    When considering the role of groups in politics, how should we count and categorize them? The most common approach is using the lobbyist database compiled by the California Secretary of State. This office publishes a directory of lobbyists, their employers, and all campaign contributions of $100 or more. About four thousand lobbyists work in Sacramento, including in-house lobbyists who work for a particular interest and contract lobbyists representing many interests.

    Let’s categorize interest groups according to who they represent. We can discern four types: business, labor, government, and citizen groups. A business interest group directly represents one business (such as a single utility or oil company) or may represent hundreds of organizations, such as the California Chamber of Commerce. It may also be an association of professionals, such as realtors or doctors. A labor group is typically a union. Its members are employees who contribute dues that pay for political activities. Government groups are groups that represent local governments. They seek to inform and persuade lawmakers about local preferences. Government groups cannot give campaign contributions. Finally, citizen groups are all the groups that represent a myriad of contemporary concerns, such as social, environmental, or civil rights issues. In the last few decades, citizen groups have proliferated! Table 7.4.1.1. lists selected groups under each category.

    Table \(\PageIndex{1}\):Types of Interest Groups

    Types of Interest Groups with Examples

    Business 

    California Chamber of Commerce

    Chevron, USA

    California Farm Bureau

    California Medical Association

    Labor

    California Teachers Association

    Service Employees International Union

    Government

    League of California Cities

    Citizen

    Mexican American Legal Defense Fund

    Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association

    Right to Life League

    Table 7.4.1.2 shows the expenditures of lobbyists in one legislative cycle.

    Table \(\PageIndex{2}\): Lobbying Expenditures by Economic Sector

    Lobbyists Categorized by Economic Sector

    Expenditures in the 2019-2020 legislative session (millions)

    Agriculture

     10.1

    Education

     47.7

    Entertainment

     14.1

    Finance

     53.1

    Government

    116.3

    Health

      87.7

    Labor Unions

      24.0

    Legal

      13.0

    Lodging/Restaurants

        3.5

    Manufacturing/Industrial

      72.7

    Merchandising/Retail

      12.3

    Miscellaneous

    148.9 (self-designated)

    Oil/Gas

     38.5

    Political Organization

         .6

    Professional Trade

      29.9

    Public Employee

        8.9

    Real Estate

      16.8

    Transportation

      20.8

    Utilities

      55.5

    (California Secretary of State)

    Total spending for state legislative races, including individual, party, and interest group expenditures in 2020, was $103,508,616 for the State Assembly races and $56,819,236 for the State Assembly. The top interest group contributors to state legislative races in this election are listed in Table 7.4.1.3.

    Table \(\PageIndex{3}\): Top Ten Contributors to State Legislative Races in 2020

    Top Ten Interest Group Contributors to State Legislative Candidates

    Expenditures (in millions)

    1. California Association of Realtors

    4.5

    1. California State Council of Laborers

    4.0

    1. Service Employees International Union California State Council

    3.9

    1. State Building and Construction Trade Council

    3.9

    1. California Teachers Association

    3.5

    1. California Professional Fire Fighters Association

    2.9

    1. Pechanga Band of Luiseño Mission Indians

    2.9

    1. AT&T

    2.8

    1. California Dental Association

    2.8

    1. California State Association of Electrical Workers

    2.8

    (“At a Glance”)

    Reviewing the data in Table 7.4.1.3 about lobbying and campaign finance shows that lobbyists and campaign finance contributions represent a diverse group of organized interests: businesses, labor, government, and citizen groups. However, it is clear that if a group of Californians does not organize into an interest group and lobby, their voice will not be as well-represented. Thus, the voices of poor people and other marginalized groups are not very well represented in interest group politics.


    This page titled 7.4.1: The Range of Interest Groups in Sacramento is shared under a CC BY 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Steven Reti.

    • Was this article helpful?