Chapter 16: Unbundling Precarious Creativity in China – “Knowing-How” and “Knowing-To”
- Page ID
- 175236
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)
- 16.1: Introduction
- Introduction to the goals of the chapter: unbundling the concept of creative precarity and analyzing the relationship between creativity and knowledge capital, focusing on China.
- 16.2: Contextualizing Precarious Creativity
- Contextualizing creative precarity in China, with an introduction to the concepts of “knowledge-how” and “knowledge-to.”
- 16.3: A Chinese Political Economy Framework
- Considering the social and political context of labor in China, and how this distinguishes the meaning of precarious creativity in China from that in other countries.
- 16.4: Knowledge Capital
- Definition of knowledge capital, and how it relates to both knowing-that and knowing-how.
- 16.5: Media – The Game Changes
- Recent changes in the Chinese media industry, including a rise in workers trained in multinational companies transferring their knowledge to Chinese companies, the commercialization of broadcasting industries, and the growth of private-owned production companies which are still subject to state censorship.
- 16.6: The Cultural Innovation Timeline Reconsidered
- An argument for the concept of creative precarity in China being not simply a negative indicator, using the cultural innovation timeline (standardized production, imitation, collaboration, cultural trade, production/management consolidation, peer/creative communities).
- 16.7: Concluding Remarks – The (Precarious) Elephant in the Room
- How creative precarity in China is distinguished from creative precarity in other developed nations, by censorship and the existence of an additional dimension of knowledge capital (“knowing-to”).