Skip to main content
Social Sci LibreTexts

6.6: Embedding Evidence-Based Practices within CAPs

  • Page ID
    57859
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    While Mayer’s model provides the roadmap for considering and designing the looks and sounds of instruction, it offers no guidance in terms of the substance of the content to be delivered. Therefore, CAPs must draw from a menu of EBPs for vocabulary instruction depending on the term or concept being taught. A menu containing EBPs that make particular sense for inclusion within the CAP model for vocabulary instruction is presented in Table 6.6.1. It is important to note that more is not necessarily better when it comes to including EBPs within CAPs. Instead, logical choices supported by the term/concept, the meaning, and how much information students need to know should drive decision-making. To illustrate, it might make sense when teaching the term biodegradable to explicitly teach students about the prefix bio-, the root word degrade, the suffix -able, to give an example and non-example of the term, and to define the term using a student-friendly definition attached to an anchor image. In addition, it would make sense to create CAPs for other terms being taught in this unit such as biodiversity, recycling, and conservation.

    Table 6.6.1: Sample evidence-based practices for teaching vocabulary terms/concepts

    Review and Select Relevant Evidence-Based Practices (EBPs)

    Choose from this menu of vocabulary instruction EBPs that make sense for the term being taught, given its content-specific meaning and students’ learning needs. (Note: This list is not exhaustive.)

    Evidence-based practices
      Semantic feature analysis and mapping (Ebbers & Denton, 2008)
      Explicit instruction, using examples/non-examples, student-friendly definitions, explicit language (Archer & Hughes, 2011)
      Keyword mnemonic strategy (Mastropieri, Berkeley, & Graetz, 2010)
      Word ID strategy (Lenz & Hughes, 1990)
      Morphemic awareness & analysis (Reed, 2008)
      Using instructional technology including visuals (Xin & Rieth, 2001)
      Graphic organizers (Dexter, Park, & Hughes, 2011)
      Content enhancements (Deshler & Shumaker, 2006)
      Anchored instruction (Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt, 1990)

    Table 6.6.2 provides a worksheet teachers and other educators can use to plan the content of CAPs before bringing them to life with Mayer’s instructional design principles. Some recommendations to help guide teachers planning to create CAPs include the following:

    • Take a bank of vocabulary terms for a unit and practice matching them to EBPs that would be appropriate given student needs and the features of the term.
    • Write a script for the CAP in advance and share with a colleague.
    • Justify selection of EBPs during a planning meeting with teammates, including other special educators or general-education teachers.

    To operationalize these recommendations, Table 6.6.3 is a functional score sheet an instructor can use to evaluate a CAP’s use of EBPs within the video. Kennedy et al. (2014) used this score sheet in a recent study in which teacher candidates were taught how to make CAPs; the products were evaluated using this, and the rubric of Mayer’s principles noted in Table 6.4.1.

    Table 6.6.2: Vocabulary planning worksheet for embedded evidence-based practices within CAPs

    Term/Concept:

    Fancy Definition:

    Student-Friendly Definition:

    • What does the student’s IEP say about his or her strengths for learning?
    • What background knowledge is needed to learn this term/concept?
    • What are related terms and how are they related? Different?
    Term Similarity One: Similarity Two: Difference One: Difference Two:
             
             
    • Does the word have any morphological parts that have specific meaning? What do they mean?
    • What is an example of this term/concept students would probably understand?
    • Is there a non-example that might confuse them?
    • In your experience, what is a good way for students to remember this term/concept?
    • Is this term a candidate for the keyword mnemonic strategy?
    • Provide a passage from the textbook or other source that uses this term in context.
    • What is a question about this term/concept you might write for a quiz or test?
    • What is a sample question from the state assessment that might be asked about this term/concept?

     

    Table 6.6.3: CAP Evidence-Based Practice Worksheet
    Name: Term/Concept:
    Preteaching/Word choice Y N Notes
    Word choice is appropriate for content      
    Word choice is appropriate for grade/skill level      
    Provides rationale for word selection      
    Background knowledge is provided for word      
    Puts word in context      
    Explains how word connects to class content      
    Word is pronounced correctly      
    Word is sounded out and pronounced by syllable      
    Definition      
    Provides formal definition      
    Provides student friendly definition      
    Definition given at beginning      
    Definition given at end      
    Definition repeated      
    Multiple definitions provided      
    Compared to definition of known words      
    Teaching Behaviors      
    Uses explicit language      
    Uses examples      
    Uses non-examples      
    Provides opportunities to practice      
    Breaks instruction into manageable chunks      
    Connections to known words      
    Evidence-based Practices: Select which practice is used and fill out the chart for that practice      
    1. Semantic Feature Analysis      
      Characteristics identified      
      Characteristics defined      
      Other terms given      
      Comparisons made      
      Concluding statement      
    2. Keyword Mnemonic      
      Keyword given      
      Keyword appropriate      
      Interaction given      
      Retrieval steps given      
      Retrieval practiced      
      Definition practiced     Number of times?
    3. Word ID/morphemic analysis      
      Correct root word identified      
      Correct root word defined      
      Correct prefix identified      
      Correct prefix defined      
      Correct suffix identified      
      Correct suffix defined      
      Root, prefix, suffix stated together with definition      
      Retrieval/definition practiced     Number of times:
    4. Graphic organizer/content enhancement      
      Appropriate GO/CE device chosen      
      GO/CE presented      
      Each component of GO/CE taught      
      Each component of GO/CE reviewed      
      Retrieval practice     How many times?
    5. Anchored instruction      
      Appropriate anchor chosen      
      Critical components of anchor identified      
      Critical components of anchor explained      
      Critical components of term identified      
      Critical components of term explained      
      Term and anchor explicitly compared      
      Retrieval practice     How many times?
    6. Other      
      What practice?     Name the practice:
      Is the practice used correctly?